chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Rudolf Spielmann
Moscow (1925), Moscow URS, rd 17, Dec-02
Queen's Gambit Declined: Capablanca - General (D30)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 9 times; par: 86 [what's this?]

Annotations by Efim Bogoljubov.      [5 more games annotated by Bogoljubov]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Lasker/Spielmann games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-13-04  ughaibu: According to the database this is Lasker's only win against Spielmann. Apart from Lasker's 15th move all the action takes place in a rook ending. Spielmann's 28th seems to be a choice of evils, I think I'd've preferred to take the c-pawn.
Jul-24-05  soberknight: Yes, this is the only time Lasker managed to Beat Spielmann.
Apr-01-09  WhiteRook48: annotation on <36. h5> <? 36. b5 wins>
36. b5 is not a legal move.
May-06-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <WhiteRook48: annotation on <36. h5> <? 36. b5 wins> 36. b5 is not a legal move.>

No doubt a transcription error from English notation and 36. g5 is meant.

The funny thing is that Bogoljubov's notes originally were published in algebraic, then presumably translated into English notation, then (mis)translated back into algebraic.

May-06-09  AnalyzeThis: Nice game by Lasker.
May-07-09  Fanacas: Soberknight. Treu but spielmann didnt beat lasker even 1 time.
May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: <ughaibu> <Spielmann's 28th seems to be a choice of evils, I think I'd've preferred to take the c-pawn.>

But 28...bxc4 29.Rxa5 leaves White with a passed a-pawn. The pawn on c4 will also fall after Kc3-c4. If Black tries to block this with 29...Rb3, then White plays 30.Ra7+ Kd6 31.Rxg7.

Of course, the game continuation is also a win for White.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  shalgo: Khalifman gives Bogoljubow's suggestion on move 25 as 25...b4 26.cxb4 Rxb4 27.Ra5 Rb7, rather than 27...Rb2 as given in the notes here. That is probably correct, as Rb2 seems totally lost after 28.Rxa7+ Kd6 29.Rxg7.

Bogoljubow's 37...Rb4 does not draw after either Reti's 38.Kf4!? Rxd4+ 39.Kg5 or Khalifman's more prosaic 38.Kxe6 Rxd4 39.Kf6. Therefore, 36.h5 was not a mistake.

May-07-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Position after 22....b5


click for larger view

Here is Lasker on the defending side of a similar ending 30 years before.

Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1895

After 24....Rd5:


click for larger view

Oct-04-11  druknight: Isnt the perfectly sensible move 9...b5? Why not hit the B and open up an extended fianch for your B? I bet 4 out 5 blitz guys would do it automatically.

Ironically alek himself commented on move 9. But not very insightfully in my opinion...

You'll notice at this pt in the game Spielmann's rooks are not connected (and Laskers are) and his B is entombed a little; i.e. it takes a couple of moves to free it and connect rooks. THus it makes no sense to open files like that.

Look at how Colle hits the B in this game:

Tarrasch vs Colle, 1924

Oct-04-11  Shams: <druknight> It sounds like you are suggesting not 9...b5 which just drops a pawn but rather 9...dxc4 10.Bxc4 b5, the standard development plan for Meran-type structures. To be honest I'm not sure what happens to this plan when White, as here, has taken on f6 and brought Black's queen to that square. Perhaps Black should look to his king first, before opening the game for his bishops?
Aug-20-12  master of defence: <One of the very rare cases of Lasker playing an ending with lack of precision and thereby enabling the opponent to force the draw by a subtle manoeuvre. White could have won quite easily by 36 b5.> I think itīs 36.g5 the move that wins for white.
Aug-20-12  master of defence: < Black misses his opportunity. It was only in the post mortem that Spielmann found out how he could have drawn the game here by 37...Rb4! 38 h6 Rb3! 39 Rxa4 Rh3 40 Kd6 Rxh6, etc.> 38.Kf4 Rxd4+ 39.Kg5 wins for white again.
Sep-03-13  JoergWalter: <master of defence: < Black misses his opportunity. It was only in the post mortem that Spielmann found out how he could have drawn the game here by 37...Rb4! 38 h6 Rb3! 39 Rxa4 Rh3 40 Kd6 Rxh6, etc.> 38.Kf4 Rxd4+ 39.Kg5 wins for white again.>

The winning method <38.Kf4 Rxd4+ 39.Kg5> is analogous to:

Capablanca vs Tartakower, 1924

and Reti charges his knowledge of it to F.J. Prokop in his Masters of the chessboard

Sep-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: 36 h5 <? One of the very rare cases of Lasker playing an ending with lack of precision and thereby enabling the opponent to force the draw by a subtle manoeuvre.>

One of the numerous cases of Bogoljubov's notes lacking precision.

Thanks to <shalgo> for pointing out that h5 is not a mistake on Lasker's part.

Sep-04-13  RookFile: Humorous notes here. And I'm sure that Bogo's analysis was copied uncritically, for decades, in numerous places.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Moscow 1925
by suenteus po 147
Instructive chess endgames I
by Jaredfchess
Game 55
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by MSteen
Game #75
from John Nunn's Chess Course copy by fredthebear
A nice Rook Ending win
from Lasker the Master by darook
Game #75
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
lasker 5
from great endings by emilio martinez
Moscow 1925
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Selected Lasker
by LaBourdonnaisdeux
Instructive chess endgames I
by wwall
Game #75
from Lasker JNCC by chestofgold
Game #75
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
R+P ending
from keypusher's bookmarked games by keypusher
January, p. 5 [Game 2 / 4783]
from American Chess Bulletin 1926 by Phony Benoni
ANNOT
from lis great games by gmlisowitz
The Lion King
by chocobonbon
Game 55
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by MSteen
Endgames
by ipap
Game 55
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC