Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Miguel Najdorf vs Viacheslav Ragozin
Saltsj÷baden Interzonal (1948), Stockholm SWE, rd 16, Aug-08
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian. Smyslov Variation (D98)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 21 times; par: 64 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 1,530 more games of Najdorf
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-02  ughaibu: Another of those games showing how useless a queen can be.
Dec-10-02  bishop: Why did White resign? Where is the win after 44.Kd2?
Dec-10-02  ughaibu: I'm not sure, how does white meet Nd6?
Dec-10-02  ughaibu: On the other hand, how about simply capturing h3 and queening the h-pawn?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: I think 44.Kd2 Nd6 45.Ne3 is not clear but maybe I'm missing something. But black can play also 44...b5 45.Qxb5 (If 45.Qa3 or 45.Qa5 or 45.Qa6 then 45...Nf3+ 46.Ke2 Bg5 threatening 47...Ng1 mate.) 45...Nf3+ 46.Ke2 N5d4+ (46...Bg5? 47.Qe8+ and 48.Qxe4) 47.Bxd4 Re1+ 48.Nxe1 Nxd4+ and 49...Nxb5.
Dec-10-02  bishop: Honza, I believe your analysis clears things up, not easy stuff to see though. Najdorf should have played on and let Ragozin play these pretty variations.
Dec-10-02  drukenknight: Is there a reason white cant play 33 or 34 Kg1? Seems like that would break both pins (33 Kg1) which seems a valid response to the attack strategy.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 1) 33.Kg1 Bxb2 34.Qb3 Bxc1 etc.

2) 34.Kg1 Rxc2 35.Nxc2 Rd1+ 36.Kg2 Bc7 with decisive advantage of black.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: I have found this game just now in a book "Izbrannye partii Ragozina" with Ragozin's own comments. He wrote that the game was postponed in position after 43...Ng1+ and that later Najdorf asked him how he wants to win the game. They built the position on chessboard and Ragozin showed this variation - 44.Kd2 Nf3+ 45.Ke2 Nd6 46.Qd7 Ng1+ 47.Ke3 Rd1. Najdorf then determined to resign.
Dec-10-02  ughaibu: Interesting and sounds like typical Najdorf. Perhaps you should translate the book, I dont think there is a Ragozin collection in english.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: I don't know if that book was translated from Russian into any other language (in Czech or Slovak certainly was not). It was published in 1963 after Ragozin's death as a little collection of his best or most interesting or most important games. But I am not good translator and my knowledge of Russian and English is far from sufficient for doing such a job as translating books.:-)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Smyslov suggested sac 26.Rxc6 bxc6 27.Bxe5 as a good way of weakening of black's pressure. He is probably right but I think that then black's chances are still slightly better. Ragozin played this game excellently.
Nov-28-03  ughaibu: And finally this one for Drukenknight. Not only because it's a great game but also as a transition to next month, which I'm thinking of devoting to Ragozin.
Nov-28-03  technical draw: Question. Was Najdorf's Queen glued to the a3 square?
Nov-28-03  Spitecheck: Answer. No it was nailed down.

The queen really didn't have a lot of good square's where it wasn't harassed by black's motley army:). He should have sacked it for one of the black central pawns to get some value out of it. Well maybe not, but it wasn't a fun game to watch from the white side.


Dec-10-04  trguitar: Pachman gives this game a good treatment in his "Modern Chess Strategy", as an example of how a queen can be worth a rook, minor piece, and pawn. (Or in this case, less!!)

He mentions Smyslov's continuation at move 26, as well as why white resigned (both of which were covered above.)

Dec-10-04  trguitar: Pachman has some analysis, though, at move ...34 which I think is wrong. He says, 34. ... Be5 avoids the following line: 34. ... Bxf2? 35. Bxf2 e3 36. Qc3! exf2 37. Rxd2 fxe1=Q 38. Rxd8+, and White wins.

However, he misses 37...fxe1=N+!! still winning for Black. That would have been an awesome continuation to see!! Three knights, a rook, and two extra pawns vs. queen and rook.

Dec-10-04  aw1988: Indeed. However, black also missed 37...e3!!: for example if 38. Bxe3 there is Nxe3 Qxe3 Bxf2!, (Rxf2?? is just terrible) and white must give up his queen with Qxf2 (Qe2?? Bxe1!; Rxd2?? Bxe3; and if say Qc3?? there is Bxe1+ Rxd2 Bxd2 which is completely won for black; Qb3?? Bxe1+ and after say Kf1?!, there is R8d3, winning. (Rc3 Nd4 and if Qxb7 then Rf2+ Kg1 (Kxe1 Re2+ Kf1 Rd1#) Ne2+ Kh1 Rf1+ (or Ng3+ Kg1 Rf1+ Kh2 (Kg2 Rd2#) Rd2+ Qg2 Rh1#! (or just Rxg2+ etc)) Kg2 (Kh2 Bg3+ Kg2 Rg1#) Rg1+ Kh2 Bg3#, and if Qa3 (instead of Qc3 or Qb3) then simply Ba5+ winning the queen) and after Rxf2+ Kxf2 black has a won endgame.
Mar-30-06  hoopsdudedan: Question: Why couldn't black have done 41. ...Nxa7?
Premium Chessgames Member
  crafty: 41...♘xa7 42. ♕xa7 ♗g5+ 43. ♔e2 ♖c1 44. ♘e3 ♗xe3 45. fxe3 =   (eval 0.01; depth 15 ply; 250M nodes)
Apr-03-06  hoopsdudedan: oh of course
Jul-02-07  sanyas: <aw1988> don't you mean 34...e3
Jul-13-07  guybrush: Perhaps the following is the win?

44. Kd2 Bg5+ 45 Kc3 Ne2+ 46 Kc4 b5+

Then if 47 Qxb5 Nd6+ (fork) or
47 Kxb5 Nc3+ (fork). Looks forced.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 101 in Soviet Chess Strategy by Alexey Suetin
from Rgrrgrr at Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 2
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by isfsam
getting a feel for the openings (D)
by fourier
Queen versus three minor pieces
from Modern Chess Strategy by BlueMooner
Stunners in King's Indian, Dutch & Grunfeld
by mmzkr
1948 Saltsj÷baden interzonal
by jww
Queen versus three minor pieces
from Modern Chess Strategy by Del ToRo
Viacheslav Ragozin (1908-1962)
from PLayer of the day:notable game II by nikolaas
[The Value of the Pieces]
from Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy by medisynergi
Queen sac and excellent attack
from Honza Cervenka's favorite games2 by Honza Cervenka
Saltsj÷baden Interzonal 1948
by Tabanus
Games Involving Queen Sacrifices
by Ron
davidcinca's favorite games
by davidcinca
Game 2
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by Qindarka
Game 101
from Soviet Chess Strategy (Suetin) by Qindarka
Game 2
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by Retarf
[The Value of the Pieces]
from Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy by maoam
[The Value of the Pieces]
from Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy by brucemubayiwa
Ragozin's Selected Games
by meloncio

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC