chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Miguel Najdorf vs Yuri Averbakh
"Grand Yuri" (game of the day Nov-30-2014)
Zurich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 22, Oct-10
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical. Traditional Variation (E17)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 72 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Najdorf/Averbakh games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-31-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <iron maiden>, here is another one for your zugzwang collection, also from Zurich 1953. It's hard to believe that Najdorf could get himself into such a straitjacket.
May-31-05  iron maiden: Indeed it is, thank you.
May-31-05  Kangaroo: Look at
Euwe vs Averbakh, 1953
for another example of fine techniques
Oct-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: I like this game for an example of utilizing the deflection and the pin tactic, which is used here in conjunction with the zugzwang theme.

After <35...f5!> all piece moves enable Black to obtain a decisive advantage as in the game or after the possibility 36. Rd3 Nb2 37. Rb3 Nd1 , when Black wins a piece (as in the following position).


click for larger view

Oct-26-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: The simple double attack 40...Rc4! wins without any need for subtle zugzwang-like maneuvers.
Feb-20-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: <patzer2>, what's the hurry? ...♖c4 is coming soon enough, but first Black stops any possibility of White's ♖ using the c-file to penetrate to c6 and attack the ♙a6 while Black grabs ♙s. By stopping any chance of White counterplay, Black convinced White to resign sooner.
Feb-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: Maybe time control was move 40 and Black wanted to eliminate even the slightest counter play by White. Rc4 is not going away.
Feb-08-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  bubuli55: Nice game. For me 35...f5 is difficult to see
Oct-30-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: Amazing that black's winning virtually out of the opening. According to Bronstein, white's chance for defense was 21.Nd3 followed by Rfc1.
Nov-30-14  Delboy: Instructive example on the need to avoid a bad bishop.
Nov-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: It all came down to the square c4. Averbakh only needed one square to win this game. Truly world-class play.
Nov-30-14  Swedish Logician: <An Englishman>, the game reminded me of the great square c4 classic H K Mattison vs Nimzowitsch, 1929 .
Nov-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: What surprised me, come to this game, that this was neither the first nor last time the dubious and illogical 9.bxc3 was essayed. Small wonder White soon comes into difficulties over the defence of c4, though Najdorf's play was nothing if not acquiescent.
Nov-30-14  morfishine: Fascinating positional study. White's position is rendered incredibly weak in all aspects: mobility, piece coordination, prospects, etc. Wait, thats pretty much the definition of zugzwang: Practically any move by White makes his position even weaker
Nov-30-14  goodevans: <zydeco: ... According to Bronstein, white's chance for defense was 21.Nd3 followed by Rfc1.>

You don't need to be one of the world's great players to see that <21.Bd2 Nc4 22.Be1> is going to leave white's position highly compromised. I know because I'd worked that much out myself.

21.Bd2? was a truly horrible error of judgement for a top GM to have made.

Nov-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <goodevans: You don't need to be one of the world's great players to see that <21.Bd2 Nc4 22.Be1> is going to leave white's position highly compromised....>

While I certainly agree, and should likely have plumped for Bronstein's suggestion myself--a logical one in my view--after 21.Nd3 b5 22.Rfc1 Nc4, Najdorf's game would not have been a bed of roses either; that bishop at f4 cuts a miserable figure and is likely the reason he rejected the line.

Nov-30-14  Lparker: What about 29.Rc5?
Nov-30-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Once: A delightful positional squeeze. I must admit that I don't see a zugzwang here. White is tied down almost totally, but he hasn't been run out of moves so that he is forced to play a move than ruins his position.

At some point in the future black is going to play Rc4 and win either the white b or d pawns. The black king on d7 prevents the white rook from having any entry squares along the c file.

Nov-30-14  morfishine: <Once> I was wondering about 41...Kd7 thinking it was more of a waiting move, but you are right!
Dec-01-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White doesn't have the bad bishop...it is ugly!
Feb-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 10 Ne5 led to nothing for White; 10 Nd2 followed by Nb3 looks more logical aimed at keeping the black knight from a5 where it hits the weakness on c4. 19..bxc 20 Na6 would have given White good counterplay. 21 Nd3 was an alternative avoiding the "good knight versus bad bishop" ending although after 21 Nd3..b5 22 Rfc1..Ba3 23 Rc2..Nc4 Black would have had a clear positional edge. 22..Bxb4 was a good example of trading one advantage for another. 31..Rb2 32 Rc1..Rxb4 33 Rc7 would have given White unnecessary counterplay.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Positional Themes
by KingG
QID Classical. Traditional (E17) 0-1 Deflection, Pin, Zugzwang
from QFianchettos by fredthebear
Game 148
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by isfsam
QID Classical. Traditional (E17) 0-1 Deflection, Pin, Zugzwang
from Game collection: Zws by fredthebear
Exchanges
from Positional Chess Handbook II by Retarf
40a_R+B:R+N (the little inequality) II
by whiteshark
Game 148
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Baby Hawk
Positional Themes
by Del ToRo
Game 148
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by MSteen
Exchanges
from Positional Chess Handbook II by Kanenda
Queen's Indian
by Chessdreamer
Chapter 4 (White to play, move 21)
from Shereshevsky's Endgame Strategy by hms123
Game 148
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by cassiooo
Averbakh's Selected Games, 1943-1975
by Resignation Trap
Zugzwangs
by obrit
Game 20
from Naked Chess: How to Win by Once
35...f5!
from Pin and Deflection by patzer2
Exploiting the bad bishop. Start at move 20.
from Foodfight's Chess Club Games by foodfight
Round Twenty-Two, Game 148
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC