Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Friedrich Saemisch vs Aron Nimzowitsch
"The Immortal Zugzwang Game" (game of the day Jan-31-2009)
Copenhagen (1923), Copenhagen DEN, rd 6, Mar-09
Queen's Indian Defense: Classical. Traditional Variation Nimzowitsch Line (E18)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 86 times; par: 34 [what's this?]

Annotations by Aron Nimzowitsch.      [48 more games annotated by Nimzowitsch]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Saemisch/Nimzowitsch games
sac: 20...fxe4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <beatgiant> Go one more move, Mr Kramnik! 17 Rxe6!

click for larger view

Komodo gives a .71 which indicates a large edge, but maybe some trouble in conversion.

So 13 Nxd5 would have been worth trying, but 13...Nxd4 14 Nxe7+ Qxe7 15 Qe3 looks to be a safe line for Black. Stockfish 0.18/33 Komodo 8 0.26/24

Dec-05-15  RookFile: Yes, that looks right. Microscopic edge for white. When white played Ne5 he probably played it for some reason other than exchanging it for the knight that was on b8. It stands to reason he should look at alternatives to 13. Nxc6.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: For those of you that have the knowledge, this game is the main subject of The London Times Listener Crossword number 4377, <Russian Roulette>, by Rasputin (Saturday, December 19th 2015, Review Section).
Jan-28-16  ragtag: They can't move until Joe gets out of the bathroom.....
May-30-16  faysalshovon: sdjhdfff fdgsagtrtrwsersdsdsaghhj dsgh
Jul-20-16  Charly Dono: The immortal of the game is the end of zugzwang , not the previous development. It is the spirit of chess Nimzowitch , put into the same size space , time and pieces (life)
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <Karpova: <wellsometimes>

You aren't wrong:
24...Re2! (25.Qb3 Ba4 26.Rc8+ Rf8) is given as a simple win of the Queen on pages 284 of Garry Kasparov's 'On my Great Predecessors Part I', Everyman, 2003>

I just saw that, too, as I was playing through the game but I was afraid to ask because I thought I nobody would answer (as usually happens when there's no error to correct) or else somebody would say: "No, you %##$%, that loses everything because..."

Premium Chessgames Member
  catlover: <offramp> Interesting. Looks like crossword puzzles for VERY serious crossword fans.
Apr-29-17  JimNorCal: Over the months I return to see my comment above, that after exhausting Qside pawn moves white will have to make a losing move. One response is from <kereru> and reads in part "White can defend ... by giving up a piece ... So no, it's not a "zugzwang"."

I've tried to make sense of that but failed. So it's still a zugzwang position, at least in my view.

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: Personally, I would not equate "giving up a piece to obtain a lost position" with "sac a piece". But that's just me.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <JimNorCal: Personally, I would not equate "giving up a piece to obtain a lost position" with "sac a piece". But that's just me.>

What if you are a piece ahead at the time, as in this game?

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: After donating the piece, White is down 2 pawns. A lost position.

If he did not have to move, White has a material advantage- piece for 2 pawns. Hey, "if he did not have to move" ... there's a name for that condition ... starts with 'z' ...

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <JimNorCal: Over the months I return to see my comment above, that after exhausting Qside pawn moves white will have to make a losing move. One response is from <kereru> and reads in part "White can defend ... by giving up a piece ... So no, it's not a "zugzwang"." I've tried to make sense of that but failed. So it's still a zugzwang position, at least in my view.>

As with many arguments, it comes down to how you define the term at issue. Some people define zugzwang as <you lose because you have to move and for no other reason>. A simple example is: White: pawn on d7, K on e6. Black: King on d8. If Black has to move, he loses. If he doesn't, he draws. Under this definition, the final position in this game isn't zugswang. From the wikipedia article:

<White has a few pawn moves which do not lose material, but eventually he will have to move one of his pieces. If he plays 1.Rc1 or Rd1, then 1...Re2 traps White's queen; 1.Kh2 fails to 1...R5f3, also trapping the queen, since White cannot play 2.Bxf3 because the bishop is pinned to the king; 1.g4 runs into 1...R5f3 2.Bxf3? Rh2 mate. Angos analyzes 1.a3 a5 2.axb4 axb4 3.h4 Kh8 (waiting) 4.b3 Kg8 and White has run out of waiting moves and must lose material. Best in this line is 5.Nc3!? bxc3 6.bxc3, which just leaves Black with a serious positional advantage and an extra pawn.[46] Other moves lose material in more obvious ways.

However, since Black would win even without the zugzwang,[47] it is debatable whether the position is true zugzwang. Even if White could pass his move he would still lose, albeit more slowly, after 1...R5f3 2.Bxf3 Rxf3, trapping the queen and thus winning queen and bishop for two rooks.>

The article suggests that the final position of Podgaets vs M Dvoretsky, 1974

click for larger view

and Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 after 34....Rg8

click for larger view

are purer examples of middlegame zugzwang than this one.

Whatever. It's still a cool game (though overrated in my opinion). I looked back through the kibitzing and saw that I argued, excessively rudely, with <Once> about it. Sorry, <Once>.

Apr-30-17  JimNorCal: OK, <kp> and <kereru>, the threat to play R5f3 and get Q, B, 2Ps for 2R and Kt is a fair argument. Also the Winter history article is fascinating. So many of the Winter links fail, I hadn't even bothered to click through.
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: <JimNorCal:> I'm with you. If you define Zugzwang as being forced to make a move that gives you an inferior position or loses a few points, then someday, when the computers have figured out how to win every game with white from move 1, white will start each game with d4 and announce ZUGZWANG!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: Nimzovich was so creative, such as this game shows. What a genius.
Premium Chessgames Member
  belladonne: hello everyboby!! can someone explain me why 9...cxd5 is better than 9...exd5??. Because it seems to me that in the second choice, black structure is more dynamic?
Aug-28-18  Olavi: 9...exd5 10.e4 increases the power of Bg2 significantly, whether Black allows exd5 cxd5 or a weakness on c6, e.g. 10...dxe4 11.Nxe4 Nd5!? and probably 12.Nc3. So 9...cxd5 takes control of e4. White would have been better off with 9.e4 with similar ideas, except after the well known and good gambit 9...dxc4 10.Nxc4 Ba6 11.b3 b5 12.Ne3 b4 13.Ne2 Bxe2 14.Qxe2 Qxd4 15.Bb2. That, in turn, explains why 8...c6 has been replaced by (mostly) 8...Na6.
Premium Chessgames Member
  belladonne: <Olavi> Thanks for your explanations. It will be more obvious for me now.
Aug-29-18  JimNorCal: <CHC>: "someday, when the computers have figured out how to win every game with white from move 1, white will start each game with d4 and announce ZUGZWANG!"

Good observation! Though you have a slight typo, should be "e4" not d4 LOL.

Aug-29-18  RookFile: This game is an example of excellent marketing by Nimzo. Take a look at the position after 12 moves. White has a development lead, dominates the e5 square, and black has a lame bishop on b7. After Nimzo's 12....Nc6 white has a chance to cash in on these advantages with 13. Nxd5! but lets it pass. That's just the sort of move somebody like Alekhine would not have failed to play against him.
Feb-20-19  Patzer Natmas: I'm a fan of Nimzo and was trying to make sure I didn't have a bias in my statement. Nimzo does mention "eventually throw himself upon the sword".

26. a3 a5 (keeping zugzwang)

26. g4 R5f3 27. Qxf2 Rxf2 (not a GM so I can't see all the variations but it looks like black would have the advantage).

Also, since the game ends here (move 25), we can conclude that Saemisch saw his defeat was inevitable.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Bit of a marmite game this one. You either love it or think it's overrated.

As kereru posted 4 years ago the game was ignored till Nimzo went on a "...propaganda blitz. He burst into annotational song..."

Tartakower and Du Mont left it out of their 500 games. Winter mentions Tartakower liking Morphy's 33.b3

click for larger view

in Morphy vs Loewenthal, 1858 as an example of Zugzwang.

Personally it's a good game with that bit of humour added 25...h6 and Saemisch did the right thing by resigning to preserve the position for posterity.


May-02-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: 'Black can now make waiting moves with his King, and White must, willy-nilly, eventually throw himself upon the sword.'

I don't get this.

Both players can now make waiting moves with his King, in which case the game will end in a draw.

Surely, black has to play Rf3 and then wins.

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <N.O.F. NAJDORF>

<Both players can now make waiting moves with his King>

If White plays Kh2, his only king move, it leaves the bishop on g2 pinned and that allows Black to win by replying ...Rf3.

<Surely, black has to play Rf3 and then wins.>

On the immediate ...Rf3, White has Bxf3.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
martineden's favorite games
by martineden
Games I Like
by arctic tern
The Immortal Zugzwang Game (White has run out of good moves)
from Positional and Strategic Brilliancies by Jaredfchess
#4-The Immortal Zugzwang Game (19/111)
from World's Greatest Chess Games by uril
gauravsaurav's favorite games
by gauravsaurav
The immortal zugzwang game; White really has no move.
from Crafty's Analysis by crafty
Nimzovitsch - Best of the Best´s
from Ninja Player's favorite games by Ninja Player
Great Finishes
by williscreek
25. h6!
from Zugzwang by Jaredfchess
Game 19
from Mammoth Book-Greatest Games (Nunn/Burgess/Emms) by Parmenides1963
Immortal Zugzwang Game
from Good games ought to know by EvgeniyZh
The World's Greatest Chess Games- 100 Games
by 50movesaheadofyou
Copenhagen 1923 "The Immortal Zugzwang " (GOTD)
from Favorite Games from (1917-1943) by wanabe2000
from Runners-up by nosuchdude
Hypermodern chess: Aron Nimzovich by Reinfeld
from yPublished Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source by fredthebear
Game 94
from number 1 by Frodo7
MKD's Favourite Games
by MKD
The Immortal Zugzwang Game
from Game collection: + by Koba
The Last move is similar to Alekhine's h4!!
from the most instructive classic games by Atsa
"The Immortal Zugzwang Game"
from 1920s Roar by Fredthebear by fredthebear
plus 350 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC