Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

John Nunn vs Kiril Dimitrov Georgiev
"Nunn the Wiser" (game of the day Aug-06-2006)
Linares (1988), Linares ESP, rd 5, Feb-28
Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov. Modern Variation (B17)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 77 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Nunn/Kiril D Georgiev games
sac: 8.Bd3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Black's blunder 8...fxe6?? (better was 8...Ngf6 9. Nxf8 Nxf8 =) enables the deflection 9. Qh5+! which sets up a pin to win the Black Queen.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: <<Black's blunder 8...fxe6?? (better was 8...Ngf6 9. Nxf8 Nxf8 =) enables the deflection 9. Qh5+! which sets up a pin to win the Black Queen.>>

9.Qh5+, which simply drives the black King to the desired square, would not be considered a deflection.

<<fighting even when down a queen!!>>

Georgiev was never down a Queen, he was down a Queen for two minor pieces. That is not so, so bad. There are examples in theory where Black purposely sacrifices Queen for two minor pieces, a pawn, and the initiative.

Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Eggman> < 9.Qh5+, which simply drives the black King to the desired square, would not be considered a deflection.> You may have a point there. According to the definitions at
and a deflection is a tactic designed to force a piece from the defense of another square or piece. In this case, the King is not defending. So, your point is well taken.

Still, there should be a name for such a maneuver (driving a piece to the desired square). Decoy fits when a sacrifice is involved to force or lure a piece to the desired square. But in this case, your description "drive the King to the desired square" is all I can see at the moment.

Any differing opions or suggestions?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <patzer2> I have seen the terms "driving on" and "driving off" used, but for the life of me I can't remember where. Maybe they will ring a bell for someone else.
Aug-07-06  moiz: A chess player must extend the courtesy of "resign" to his opponent, when he finds himself in the position Black was in here. O.W.Holmes must have the last say here : The whole force of conversation depends on how much you can take for granted. Vulgar chess-players have to play their game out; nothing short of the brutality of an actual checkmate satisfies their dull apprehensions. But look at two masters of that noble game! White stands well enough, so far as you can see; but Red says, Mate in six moves;White looks,nods;the game is over. Just so in talking with first-rate men; especially when they are good-natured and expansive, as they are apt to be at table.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black blundered early-and resigned late.
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Phony Benoni> Thanks for the suggestion of "driving on" and "driving off." I haven't seen it used as such before, but it does seem to fit in with the definition of a "forced move" as given at

<Forced move: A move for which there is no legal or reasonable alternative...>

May-01-07  Magician of Riga: and you people complain about grandmasters drawing too many games and having no fighting spirit? Why do you complain when a grandmaster decides to fight on? Should they resign immediately if they are down so much as a pawn? Mistakes do happen and such games can be saved. I myself am rather displeased when my opponent resigns too early. If they are down a piece then its acceptable but if they simply have an uncomfortable position I'd appreciate if they played on. I wouldn't be angry if my opponent decided to continue playing when he's down material. If I'm confidant in my skills what do I have to be worried about? If I manage to lose or let the win turn into a draw I have only myself to blame and must commend my opponent on his heart and perseverance.
May-01-07  Magician of Riga: Nunn lost his queen here J Augustin vs Nunn, 1977 how disrespectful of Nunn to play on down a queen for 2 pieces perhaps he should have resigned earlier.(sarcasm)
Jan-13-08  newzild: Well, I have no problem with Georgiev playing on. I recall a famous Fischer game where he called his opponent's resignation a "bitter disappointment" because he had a brilliant mate planned. Play on, I say. Give the chess fans their money's worth.
Jan-13-08  newzild: Fischer's game: R Byrne vs Fischer, 1963
May-14-09  WhiteRook48: funny blunder
Jun-10-09  hedgeh0g: It's incredible that there were two oversights in a row by Georgiev, starting with 5...h6?! Perhaps Georgiev saw the response Ne6!, although why he would willingly go in for that line is beyond me. However, 8...fxe6?? is obviously a complete blunder.
Premium Chessgames Member
  LawrenceBernstein: Splendid technique!
Mar-20-12  Granny O Doul: I guess Georgiev was unfamiliar with the Karklins-Dlugy (1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 de 4.Ne4 Nd7 5.Bg5 Ngf6 6.Qd3 Ne4 7.Qe4 Qa5+ 8.Bd2 Qb6 9.0-0-0 Nf6 10.Qe5 Be6 11.Ba5 and 1-0 in 8-10 more moves....I may be a bit off with the move order) game from a few years before.
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: <... 'he [rather unsportingly] played on.' Eggman:
Only in chess could it be considered unsporting to refuse to give up>

So true. People have a lot of ideas about 'the right time to resign'.

Considering the level they play on, all the top players resign very late.

That is why they are top players. A chess player is a fighter or he is nothing.

Success in chess is just as much the good games you won in style, as those you were lucky to save by never giving up.

Bravo, Georgiev!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: It also might be that by playing on the eventual loser learns more about the opponent and maybe some lessons about how to play the position from the victor's side. Certainly in athletics it would be unsporting, but there, the ultimate loser can set himself other goals - a personal best, a sense of what it feels like to lose and how to cope with it etc
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Plus another, invidious motive for playing on. I remember telling my team captain that I got almost as much enjoyment from having taken part in a tough game I lost than in an easy game I won. He was not best pleased, and I realised that playing team chess was no longer for me!
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Phony Benoni: <patzer2> I have seen the terms "driving on" and "driving off" used, but for the life of me I can't remember where. Maybe they will ring a bell for someone else.>

Eight years late -- the terms are used in The Tactics of End-Games by Jeno Ban. Translation by Jeno Bochkor, so I guess he gets credit.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <keypusher> That must be it. I have the book
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: One good reason not to play the Caro-Kann, I guess.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Even Karpov had to jump through hoops to avoid a loss in this dastardly variation, in Van der Wiel vs Karpov, 1987.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I like the KNIGHT IN MID-AIR position after 5.Ng5.
Oct-05-15  zanzibar: Nunn vs Kiril D Georgiev, 1988 (kibitz #21)

And even later still... on ChessTempo, and many other places, the idea is simply called


An apt name.

Sep-02-19  Chesgambit: 5. Ng5! nice trap ( nobody played this move in 1980's)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
iranders' favorite games
by iranders
Game 20 in Starting Out: The Caro-Kann by Joe Gallagher
from Hammer the 6th Rank (Black hits 3rd Rank) III by trh6upsz
Royal Pin at 10. Ba5 wins Queen, then AP at 29. Qf4
from Absolute Pin Tactic-- OTB Examples by ChessCoachClark
Karpov. Modern Variation
from MKD's Caro Kann by MKD
fools mate-like queen pin
from pins and needles-knives and forks. by kevin86
Game 20 in Starting Out: The Caro-Kann by Joe Gallagher
from C-K Def Collected by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Linares 1988
by Tabanus
10. Ba5 makes a Royal Skewer
from Skewer Tactic-- OTB Examples by ChessCoachClark
August 6: Nunn the Wiser
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
Trapped Queen
from Grandmaster Blunders by alexmagnus
by had2x
Game 20
from Starting out : The Caro-Kann by diegoami
jjones5050's favorite games
by jjones5050
Nunn makes a NN out of Georgiev
from attacking lessons by prashla
Round Five, Game #28
from Linares 1988 by suenteus po 147
Game 20 in Starting Out: The Caro-Kann by Joe Gallagher
from yPublished Game by Year & Unconfirmed Source II by fredthebear
AdrianP's Bookmarked Games
by AdrianP
from 52a_Middlegames - -> The Q vs RBP thing by whiteshark
A good example of why sometimes the Caro-kann is not so solid.
from Opening Systems For Competive Chess Players by Cornwallis

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC