chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian
Petrosian - Spassky World Championship Match (1969), Moscow URS, rd 1, Apr-14
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Modern Variation (B42)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 33 times; par: 95 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 74 more Spassky/Petrosian games
sac: 53...Na4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Games that have been used in game collections will have a section at the bottom which shows collections which include it. For more information, see "What are Game Collections?" on our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-01-05  suenteus po 147: It's poetic justice that Spassky lost this first game of his second match with Petrosian, which he would go on to win. Petrosian himself lost the first game of his match with Botvinnik, which as we all know he went on to win.
Nov-01-05  aw1988: And Fischer lost the first game.
Nov-01-05  ttr2121: It's interesting that Petrosian tried this against Fischer in the Candidates and got wiped. The elegance of that dispatch and Petrosian's subsequent demise prompts all sorts of excuse making from the Fischer-is-a-bad-person, so-his-chess-sucks crowd, but it would appear that Petrosian simply chose a variation that he had used to beat Spassky. He offered Fischer the exchange to no avail, but one wonders if he didn't have that sac in mind here too had Spassky played c4. No matter, Fischer retired the variation for black with some very beautiful play.
Oct-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Odd ending! White has a bishop and rook vs a pawn and a rook-and is doomed! Black's threat is 57... ♖xa2 58 ♖xa2 ♙b1=♕ White can abandon the bishop to stay alive,but the king is to far away to prevent black's king and rook ushering the pawn to its maximum.
Apr-05-08  Knight13: 31. Be4? is a mistake! Trading into a NR vs BR ending with those queen side pawns on the same color as the bishop, with a protected passed pawn is suicide. White should've retained that bishop and moved the knight away.
Jul-03-09  Ulhumbrus: One interesting point is that after 14 c4 Petrosian does nothing to prevent a double exchange of pawns on d5-transforming his centre into an isolated d pawn- while Spassky does not accept the invitation. This suggests the question of why. One possible reason is that Spassky has weakened himself by f4. When Fischer obtained this attack against Petrosian, he had not played f4. Fischer did exchange pawns twice on d5, and gave Petrosian an isolated d pawn.
Jun-08-11  thejack: It wasn´t up to Fischer to "refute" this line though:

Spassky himself improved his play with 9.b3 in a later game from this match (unfortunately i don´t know which round)..and won in 58 moves!

Aug-31-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <thejack> Round 17 - Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969
Jan-26-14  Ulhumbrus: One justification for 13 f5 is that after 13 Rad1 the d file does not get opened for the rook. A second justification is that Black has not played ...Nd7 yet, so making the move ...Bf6 possible.
Apr-16-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: A difficult ending. I wonder if 52.Ke3 could be a draw.

A) 52...Ra1 52.Rxc5 Rxa2 53.Kd3 Ke6 54.Kc2, draw.

B) 52...Na4 53.Rh4 Nc3 54.Rb4 Nxa2 55.Rxb2. Draw, isn't it?

In the game, 52...Ke5 introduces a huge difference. If 54.Rb4 (instead of 54.Re6+) Ra1 55.Rxa4 Rxa2 56.Rb4 Kd5 (one can see the difference with the previous variation 'A') 57.Ke3 Kc5 58.Rb7 Kc4, Black is just in time and wins (the Black King goes to c2).

Apr-16-15  RookFile: The older I get, the more I want to play like Petrosian.
May-07-15  1d410: I want to play like Spassky but I'm only 24
Apr-10-16  rainingpieces: Interesting moment on move 42. So 42.Rd4 is not good because of 42...Rc1+ 43.Kg2 Rb1 and if 44.Rxb4 then 44...Nc5 wins a piece
Dec-01-16  thejack: 13.f5 looks natural to me. What would have followed? I guess black would not take on f5, but it doesn´t look very ccomfortable if he leaves the pawn there either. To be honest, I don´t really understand the weakening 12.g6 in the first place.
Dec-01-16  micartouse: I've always found Petrosian's play very unnerving. The position after 15. f5 is so typical in his games. The pawns are warring on the light squares; they can exchange, they can press forward, they can just stay put.

I can't tell if I think it's unaesthetic or if I just can't handle that much tension. Did Petrosian like to provoke or is it just how he views the logic of the game?

I think he'd be a good champ to study if I ever got back into the game to open my mind up.

Dec-28-17  edubueno: 13 f5! es mucho más fuerte.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
World Championship Game #1
from WCC Index [Petrosian-Spassky 1969] by Suenteus Po
Decisive World Championship Games II
by FaradayBach
m2g1-Petrosian fires first shot of rematch
from Wc-Petrosian vs Spassky by kevin86
1969 World Championship Game #1
from Road to the Championship - Boris Spassky by suenteus po 147
+4 -6 =13 vs. Spassky (World Championship, Moscow)
from Match Petrosian! by amadeus
WCC: Petrosian-Spassky 1969
by WCC Editing Project
Petrosian vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
+6 -4 =13 vs. Petrosian (World Championship, Moscow, 1969)
from Match Spassky! by amadeus
Game 1, Petrosian leads 1-0
from 1969 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Game 69
from Veliki majstori saha 27 PETROSJAN (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
zz40_R+B:R+N_(die kleine UNgleichheit)
by whiteshark
Spassky vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC