Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Lajos Portisch vs Vasily Smyslov
Portoroz (1971), Portoroz YUG, rd 3, Apr-??
Dutch Defense: Semi-Leningrad Variation (A81)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 40 times; par: 51 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 32 more Portisch/Smyslov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "A81"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-28-03  ughaibu: Is it my imagination or does Smyslov have a really bad position? So how does he win so easily? Can his moves really be so much better than his opponent's moves?
Apr-28-03  aulero: Very interesting fight!

In my opinion the key point of the game is "14.e4".

Portisch, a very fine positional player, tried to open the center in order to exploit the bishop pairs, but he probably evaluate wrongly the weakness of c4 square.

Smyslov, a giant of positional play, simply didn't miss to understand and exploit the c4 weakness: he outclassed Portisch with precise and very effective moves.

I think that the weakness of Black position was only apparent and Portisch was not able to react tactically when he discovered to be strategically lost.

Another peculiarity is the Smyslov's opening choice, very uncommon for him! It is possible that the strongest move of the game was 1...f5! Portisch surely expected something else.

According to the database, Smyslov played the Dutch defence only 6 times with Black winning four times and losing two.

This is from a world championship: Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1958

Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Impressive performance of Smyslov.
Jun-28-06  Ulhumbrus: After 15 bxc4 White has an impressive looking centre, but one tiny little thing begins to spoil things for him: Black is able to attack the c4 pawn twice by 15...Nb6 and on 16 c5 Nc4 this N is placed so well that instead of having an overwhelming position White is embarrassed by the Knight. Then on 17 Bc1 Rad8 the White centre becomes a target instead of a weapon. With the d4 pawn pinned, the c5 pawn becomes a target for ...Nd7 and ...Nxc5. Perhaps it takes just a few little things to pass what would be an overwhelming advantage otherwise to the opponent instead.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: Something from teh archives of my chess club, this is a link to a photo from the match, unfortunately I don't know which game:

The arbiter (standing) was Vasja Pirc.

Jul-16-10  King.Arthur.Brazil: Well, see that after Nc4 begin all the problems for white. 20.dxc6 was answered by powerful Nxc5, then win e4 and c6, the white couldnt defeat the treats after Qxc6! 33.Qd3 avoids 33...Qe4! after e5! the game is over.But, white continues, so the final 37...Rd3, like a mate: if 38. Qb4?? Qe1+ and win the Rd1, or Qc2?? Qf3+ Kg1 Ne3 treats Qc2, Rd1 and Qg2++, no defence!!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Everett: Suba puts it succinctly in his Dynamic Chess Strategy, c4 is weak if white fianchettoes the LSB and plays d4. This in part explains the resilient and harmonious KID and Dragon systems; both structures leave a pawn on d6 to start to counterbalance the absence of the bishop on the c8-a3 diagonal.

Portisch tries to cover it with b3, but Smyslov merely exchanges that off with ..dxc4.

After Portisch moves the Q, Smylov has Qf3+ picking up the rook on d1.

Oct-11-11  Shams: <Everett> Great comment. If others are confused, as I was: you mean the a3-f8 diagonal, yes? And the point that you are making is that the c5 square in KID and Dragon systems is not analogously weak, for Black, as c4 is for White in the scenario you describe, because Black deliberately leaves it on d6 rather than pushing to d5.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Everett: <Shams> yeah, <c8-a3 diagonal> I just broke the board into three pieces. Hilarious.

Back to the c4/c5 square, this is why there is such a raging fight over this square in Catalan structures, and part of the reason I am not fond of playing them. If it wasn't theory, I wouldn't trust the Q-side problems in those structures. In short, the resulting compensation for white is too subtle for me to handle well.

Another example of the c4 weakness is the fianchetto QID structures. With White's LSB on g2, Black playing Ba6, hitting c4, is an effective annoyance straight out of the opening. Of course it doesn't make these openings bad, it is just characteristic of why certain moves make sense in these scenarios.

Jul-16-13  Xeroxx: great game.
Jun-02-14  offramp: Smyslov places his knight on c4, then supports it. The piece becomes the axis of almost all his subsequent play.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
partij 1
from Jan timman De kunst van de analyse by i.abderrahim
Game 99
from 125 Selected Games by Vasily Smyslov by suenteus po 147
Match Smyslov!
by amadeus
Smyslov sees at once the c4 weakness
from the most instructive classic games by Atsa
(A81) Dutch, 37 moves, 0-1
from Headed to Holland Next Year with Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game 99
from 125 Selected Games by Vasily Smyslov by vrkfouri
Dutch Defense
by ISeth
by ALL
Game 62
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by demirchess
Game 99
from Selected Games (Smyslov) by Retarf
toko's favorite games
by toko
The Art of Chess Analysis (Jan Timman)
by hms123
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 8
by 0ZeR0
Power Chess - Smyslov
by Anatoly21
Chess Informant Best Games 1
by Nimzophile
Game 3
from *Portoroz Candidates Reserve Playoff 1971 by Tabanus
The Art of Chess Analysis (Jan Timman)
by igiene
Watanabe Akira no chess kougi p135
from Akira Watanabe books (unfinished) by foxmt
Leningrad Dutch: Other Ideas (Game 47c)
from Neil McDonald: Starting Out: The Dutch by Patca63
Smyslov sees at once the c4 weakness
from SmyslovV and SpasskyB Games by fredthebear
plus 38 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC