Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Spassky vs Lajos Portisch
Portisch - Spassky Candidates Quarterfinal (1980), Mexico City MEX, rd 1, Mar-30
Sicilian Defense: Closed Variation (B25)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 4 times; par: 66 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [27587 more games annotated by Stockfish]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 80 more Spassky/Portisch games
sac: 28...Rxf6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-18-09  Helios727: When they say "Event ct" what does the "ct" mean?
Aug-18-09  shalgo: <When they say "Event ct" what does the "ct" mean?>

I think it is meant to stand for "Candidates' Tournament."

This game was the first game in the Candidates' quarterfinal match between Spassky and Portisch. The match ended as a draw: each of them won one game and there were 12 draws. Portisch was declared the winner because he had won more games as black. In effect, this game decided the match.

Mar-02-12  King Death: < shalgo: This game was the first game in the Candidates' quarterfinal match between Spassky and Portisch.... Portisch was declared the winner (of the match) because he had won more games as black. In effect, this game decided the match.>

This tiebreaker wasn't great but it was better than one used in the next cycle. One player was sent home by the spin of a roulette wheel!

Portisch's move 6...e6 became standard to avoid a lot of the kingside play that White always used to get after 6...e5 when f4-f5 was often played, even as a sacrifice (Spassky vs Hort, 1978). Now nobody plays this variation of the Closed Sicilian anymore.

Nov-25-13  Howard: Chess Life analyzed this game back in late 1980, as I recall. Still remember playing it over on my pocket chess set while in my college dorm room one evening.

Regarding the tiebreak rules, they went as follows....if after ten games the score was tied, then the two players would play a two-game tiebreaker (regular time controls). If that didn't settle it, an additional two games would be played.

That would therefore make 14 games in total, and if the score was still tied then whoever had won the most games with Black would be declared the winner. If that wasn't enough to determine a winner, then the last player to have won a game would be the winner.

Rather strange way to break a tie, but then Spassky and Portisch had agreed to all this before the match started--thus, it was fair.

As an earlier kibitzer mentioned, Portisch won Game 1 (this game) and he'd had Black. Thus, he was already at an advantage right from the get-go ! Spassky won the ninth game, but.....he'd had White. The other 12 games were drawn, and Spassky thus had to go home.

Dec-31-14  poorthylacine: TO KING DEATH: "...Now, nobody plays this variation of the Closed Sicilian anymore."

sorry, KING DEATH, but my love for Spassky encouraged my to find: Spassky- Timman, Hambug 1982, 1-0, where this variation was played again by Spassky himself!...

Dec-31-14  poorthylacine: TO KING DEATH:
but maybe the game I quote was played BEFORE the one of the Spassky-Portisch match, so to be sure, I quote another one, played at Tilburg 1983, to be sure it was later: Spassky- Van der Wiel 1-0 too!!
Dec-31-14  poorthylacine: But what happens with me, even I am not drunk? 1980, then 1982, no need to add a game of 1983!!
Dec-31-14  Petrosianic: <Spassky and Portisch had agreed to all this before the match started--thus, it was fair.>

Sort of. Yes, the match was fair to both Spassky and Portisch, but was not fair to the public.

However these rules, odd as they are, are a lot better than those for previous candidates, which would have decided this match on a coin flip. That never happened until 1983 (sort of), but as far as I know, those tiebreak rules were always around.

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <poorthylacine> Drunk or sober, games played in 1982 or even 1983 don't disprove KingDeath's claim.
Oct-22-18  Howard: This encounter was a positional gem by Portisch. A bit difficult to understand, but if you spend some time with it, you'll understand his moves.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
closed sicilian
from rare openings by russbunn
Game 1
from WCC Index [Portisch-Spassky 1980] by nescio2
Closed Sicilian
from Anti-Sicilians by KingG
+1 -1 =12 vs. Portisch (Candidates 1/4, Mexico, 1980)
from Match Spassky! by amadeus
sicilian closed
by sergionm
Sicilian Closed 6.f4 7.Nf3 (B25) 0-1 Close but costly loss
from Melbourne CC Idea for Fredthebear by fredthebear
nimza's favorite games
by nimza
Game 1 March 30
from Portisch - Spassky Candidates Quarterfinal 1980 by Tabanus
endgame positions to avoid
by obrit
/\ 13.h3!
from 98_B23-B26_Closed Sicilian by whiteshark
Sicilian Closed 6.f4 7.Nf3 (B25) 0-1 Close but costly loss
from Siccilian Cllosed the Door on Fredthebear by fredthebear
endgame positions to avoid
by Jaredfchess
Closed Sicilian
from Anti-Sicilians by Patca63
+1 -1 =12 vs. Portisch (Candidates 1/4, Mexico, 1980)
from Match Spassky! by docjan

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC