chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Svetozar Gligoric vs Lev Psakhis
Sarajevo (1986), Sarajevo BIH, rd 5, Apr-??
Benoni Defense: Classical Variation. Argentine Counterattack (A75)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3,178 more games of Gligoric
sac: 20...dxc5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-22-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: Gligo squeezed by Psakhis in the endgame.

0-1 for my facebook friend GM Lev Psakhis..

Oct-24-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Baby Hawk: In his book "Rethinking the chess pieces" Andrew Soltis uses this as the example game to show that two minor pieces are stronger than a rook and two pawns in a tactical position.
Oct-24-20  SChesshevsky: < In his book "Rethinking the chess pieces" Andrew Soltis uses this as the example game to show that two minor pieces are stronger than a rook and two pawns in a tactical position.>

Have to believe this might be overstated. Maybe "are" is too strong? Would think "can be" or even "are often" could be more accurate.

Guessing the evaluation is going to be highly dependent on the two pawns and initiative. Here after 22. Rxc5, we get the two N's versus a R and two pawns. But I'd argue it's the position that gives black the edge. Psakhis quickly shows that the two N's easily blockade the hanging pawns. Suggesting that in this case the answer to the age old question, "Are hanging pawns a weakness or strength?", is clear. But that's not all as Black has the just about monster B, versus a limited white B, and also gets active control on the b-file. All equaling plenty of initiative.

Not saying that Soltis is definitively wrong. But would have to see some examples with the two pawns at least having some potential and/or the extra rook side with at least some initiative and then collapsing to accept outright "that two minor pieces are stronger than a rook and two pawns in a tactical position."

Oct-25-20  SChesshevsky: <...two minor pieces are stronger than a rook and two pawns in a tactical position.>

While reviewing a QGD Tartakower line from a recently kibitzed Kasparov-Beliavsky 1978 game, coincedently came across this nice win by Polugaevsky:

Polugaevsky vs Tal, 1980

Where the Rook and two pawns showed much more teeth. Additional investigation probably still needed before a definitive answer on the advantages or disadvantages of R and two pawns versus two minor pieces.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Benoni Def: Classical. Argentine Counterattack (A75) 0-1
from Uncle Ben's Rice shipped in a box to Fredthebear by fredthebear
R + PP < B + N in sharp middlegame
from Book: Rethinking the chess pieces: R v 2 minors by Baby Hawk
Game 13: Be2 0-0
from Modern Benoni - Everyman Chess - Andrew Kinsman by SafeNorSound
Benoni Def: Classical. Argentine Cntrattack (A75) 0-1 Stockfish
from motel swim pool kept Fredthebear aaah...cool by fredthebear
98_A60-79 BENONI - BLACK wins or draws
by whiteshark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC