Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Boris Spassky vs Anatoly Karpov
Montreal (1979), Montreal CAN, rd 13, Apr-28
Queen's Indian Defense: Miles Variation (E12)  ·  0-1



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 74 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 42 more Spassky/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-06-04  ArturoRivera: In a very similar game (just the opening) Spassky was Black, and his oponent wich was Miles, played a little bit more inteligent with 5.-h3 preventing to double pawns and loose a bishop, this trap is so bad for white beacause it not only doubles pawns and weakens the kingside, but also looses the exchange beacause in my opinion a bishop is more than a Knight.
Oct-27-05  chesscrazy: Spassky has played Miles before and Miles plays Bf4 extremely often. Here Spassky copies the idea (move 4) but ends up losing.
Oct-27-05  chesscrazy: Here are my thoughts about this game: 6.Nc3 was a bit dubious because Black can immediately trade white's bishop for black's knight (bishops aren't always better than knights). 7...d6 was a good move because Karpov sees that white will have the 2 knights so he begins making anti-knight moves to take away the knight's good squares. (Black us not in a hurry to capture white's bishop) 9.0-0 is not the best move. Better was 9.Qc2 followed by 10.Be4. 15...a6 is very good. Karpov is following the Steinitz formula wonderfully! Black is now going to blast open the center so the power of the Bishops will be felt. 19...c5 is a good move(blasting open the center). 23...Bxc3! is a good move but may cause a bit of confusion. Why was Karpov fighting so hard to keep the bishops and all of a sudden giving them up? I think the answer is that now Karpov wants to have a better pawn structure and let that eventually lead to a material advantage. 31...Bxf3! is trading advantages again. 34...a5 is zugzwang!!! All this led to a win by Karpov!!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Bf4 just looks like a bad idea all the way around.
Oct-30-05  chesscrazy: <OhioChessFan> Bf4 is not necessarily a really bad idea.
Oct-30-05  euripides: Miles beat Spaasky twice with this line in 1978. No wonder Boris was impressed.
Oct-30-05  euripides: 26 Ng1 looks more like Karpov hmself or Petrosian rather than Boris. The question is, why not 26 Rxd6 ? I gues the answer is something like 26....Bxf3 27 gxf3 Re2+ followed by Rxd6 and Ne5.

The economy of means with which Karpov then controls the position deserves comparison with Capablanca.

Nov-12-05  ajile: I've seen this idea for White where he even plays h3 before Bf4 so he can drop the bishop back to H2 if necessary. The bishop on the h2/b8 diagonal can be surprisingly strong.
Jan-06-06  hayton3: Trademark Karpov. He brings about an early endgame having acquired the advantage of the two bishops which he then transforms into a slightly better advantage: doubling White's pawns by taking the knight on c3 with the bishop.

He then sacrifices a pawn to ensure he has the more active rook in the endgame and follows up by exchanging his remaining bishop for Black's only active minor piece - his knight.

The resulting position of knight and better pawn structure versus bad bishop forces Spassky to seek active counterplay with an ensuing loss of time and pawns by which juncture Karpov has a winning endgame.

Jun-13-09  marknierras: Zugzwang for white on move 35... There are no moves that has a neutral result; great lesson in constricting opponenet!
Dec-24-09  BISHOP TAL: bxc5 seems like like a unnateral move to me, I would of gone dxc5 trying to get rid of the weak pawn karpov saw better, how far I wonder.
Sep-29-13  Ulhumbrus: Spassky tries to do without the move 6 h3 but fails almost hopelessly after 9...g6!! (accepting a weakening of the black squares in anticipation of the capture ..Nxg3 removing White's dark squared bishop) 10 h3?. Instead of 10 h3 a better choice seems 10 Nd2 0-0 11 f3 Nxg3 12 hxg3 which is also better for Black but avoids reducing so much the value of White's pawns
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <euripides: 26 Ng1 looks more like Karpov hmself or Petrosian rather than Boris. The question is, why not 26 Rxd6 ? I gues the answer is something like 26....Bxf3 27 gxf3 Re2+ followed by Rxd6 and Ne5.>

In the tournament book, Karpov gives 26.Rxd6 Rxd6 27.Rxd6 Bxf3 Ne5. Black threatens to win the bishop by ...Re2+ and ...Re1+ and of course Re6 is unplayable.

Karpov goes on, by way of example I think, <29.f4 Nf3+ 30.Kg2 Rxc3 31.Rd5 Nd4 32.Rxc5 Rb3 33.Rd5 Rb2+ etc.>

Interestingly, my engine just shreds (sorry) this analysis. After 29.f4? (the computer finds the much stronger 29.g4!, trying to bring the bishop to life) Nxc4! again threatens ...Re2+ and ...Re1+, so 30.Rd8+ is forced. 30...Kf7 31.Bd3 Ke7! 32.Rd5 Nb6! forces 33.Re5+ Rxe5 34.fxe5 a5 and Black has a won ending.

By contrast 29.f4? Nf3+? 30.Kg2 Rxc3 31.Rxa6! gives White good chances for a draw. Why should White waste several moves taking Black's c-pawn when he can grab the a-pawn immediately?

To go back to the original question, it does appear that 26.Rxd6 is stronger than 26.Ng1.

Apr-30-16  Howard: One of the top 30 games of the first half of 1979, according to Informant.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Great lesson on bishops and knights; Zugswang!- move 35
from Zws nodded Fredthebear off to sleep Zws by fredthebear
Jeremy Silman's Reassess Your Chess; pg.319
from Strategic Planning Helped Fredthebear Get In/Awa by fredthebear
Game 264
from # Chess Informant Best Games 201-300 by Qindarka
Karpov vs. the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor
Bookmarked Games
by Hesam7
Reasses Your Chess; pg.319
from Silmans Reassess Book by Patca63
contra londres
from clase justo triana by viniloangel
Anatoly Karpov's Best Games
by KingG
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by amadeus
"Chess Genius Karpov" - Victor Baturinsky
by SpaceRunner
p. 25, badly thought out Bf4
from Soltis - London by skybluesky
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by chessgain
Queen's Indian Defense: Miles Var (E12) 0-1 Constrict, Zugzwang
from Dean Owen is here today! Hip, Hip, Hoorah! by Jersey Joe
100 (31...?)
from Läufer gegen Springer (Varnusz) by Moutard
"Chess Genius Karpov" - Victor Baturinsky
by Karpova
great play by karpov
from Games for me to remember by waddayaplay

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC