Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Charles Maurian
New Orleans (1883), New Orleans, LA USA
French Defense: Steinitz Attack (C00)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Steinitz/Maurian games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: A quote from the movie Roxanne (1987):

"When you are reaching for a star,
there is a long way to fall."

I bet Steinitz was still hurting after a few days :-)

Dec-13-05  Akavall: 2...d6 is probably, I think white has nothing here.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Morphy once lost to Maurian in 12 moves! Morphy vs Maurian, 1855.
Jun-20-06  RookFile: Did you forget to mention that the game was played at ROOK odds, offramp?
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <tamar> <"He continued to play chess with Maurian for about two years, but resolutely declined to play anyone else. He also continued to concede him the Knight, in spite of the fact that Maurian gradually grew too strong for such odds. The scores in the last four series of games which they played in 1869 are given as follows: (1) Morphy 6, Maurian 3 (2)Morphy 3, Maurian 3 (3) Morphy 7, Maurian 10 and (4) Morphy 0, Maurian 4, drawn 1." Morphy's Games of Chess>

According to <SBC>, after this they played a long series of games at pawn and move (or pawn and two), but the games have not been preserved.

Jun-20-06  ughaibu: "is a guy who miscalculates
going to beat Morphy?" J Schulten vs Morphy, 1857

"I think not" --RookFile. (Roll over Descartes)

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Here is her post, copied from the Morphy page.

<SBC: <cruiseyleemorph>


download <ckr>'s wonderful mymorphy.pgn (with historical commentary)

In 1869 Morphy played 38 games against Maurian at knight odds. No exact date for any of them is known. Morphy, believing Maurian had grown too strong for knight odds, continued playing him a pawn&2 odds, none of which have been preserved. After 1869, Maurian didn't trouble Morphy with requests to play chess, but this isn't to say Morphy didn't play any more chess. While there are no game scores, it seems that Morphy played chess until at least 1877.>

Jun-20-06  ughaibu: "Maurian didn't trouble Morphy with requests to play chess", I guess he thought Morphy was too weak to provide an interesting game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <ughaibu> LOL
Jun-20-06  RookFile: We'll let ughaibu speak for himself, his words need no comment.
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Steinitz did get some payback in the following game.

Steinitz vs Maurian, 1883

Nov-30-08  WhiteRook48: <ughaibu>: What the? If Maurian thinks Morphy's weak, he's heading for trouble.
Dec-23-08  RookFile: Uggie just likes to pull people's chains. It's a great indoor sport, enjoyed by many.
Feb-07-09  WhiteRook48: of course, Morphy's career was already over
Apr-24-09  Fanacas: RookFile everyone makes mistakes ^^ in chess even your great morphy.
Apr-27-09  Fanacas: btw steinitz has great results with this openig.
Jan-12-11  slowtyper77: Steinitz looks better here, but he miscalculated the sac. I think Morphy is better than Steinitz, but this is definitely not the best evidence
Jun-29-12  e4 resigns: <2...d6 is probably, I think white has nothing here.> Actually, 2...c5 is the main move to equality.
Jun-29-12  RookFile: Move 2 and black has equalized?

I think not.

Jul-13-12  e4 resigns: 1.f3 e5 2.g4 and black has equality (Maybe 0.03)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: Morphy's whipping boy beats the great Steinitz. Maurain must have been a pretty good player. Perhaps Morphy gave him some sage advice over the years?

Morphy used to give Maurain knight knight odds and beat him most of the time. Yet Maurain beats Steinitz on even terms.

Morphy would definitely have beat Steinitz. I bet it would have been similar to the Morphy vs Harrwitz match.

Jun-17-13  Just Another Master: Morphy was a chess genius of the highest class, please dont campare him to mortals, its insulting.
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: It is equally "insulting" to compare other "great mortals" to Morphy.
Jun-18-13  KlingonBorgTatar: This game reminds me of Steinitz vs Winawer Vienna 1882, 1st game of the tie breaking match. Steinitz played the same variation, made the double rook sac, spurned a draw ( or did he miss it?) , lost the game - AND- the undivided first prize!!! Perhaps tactics were not really his forte..... or the tension of the occasion was too much for his nerves?

If my memory serves me right, Vuckevic in ' The Chess Sacrifice' writes that the positional prerequisites of making the double rook sac were simply not there. This dosen't speak well of Steinitz' positional judgement either at least in these types of positions.....

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: This has got to be a first-<JAM> actually acknowledges a player's greatness, rather than denigrating someone till the cows come home.

Seeing this makes me believe I am delusional, going blind or still worse.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
Charles Maurian: +1, -1, =0
from Steinitz' Rare Defeats. by nikolaas

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC