chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Emanuel Lasker
Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894), Montreal CAN, rd 10, Apr-19
Queen's Gambit Declined: Normal Defense (D35)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 45 more Steinitz/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-06-06  Dres1: That was easy
Oct-06-06  Dres1: I feel like im watching a game on Yahoo! Chess.
Jan-08-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Cf. Burn vs Lasker, 1900
Feb-29-08  Knight13: Who the heck castles queen side like this?
Feb-29-08  Petrosianic: Could you rephrase the question in the form of a question?
Feb-29-08  Knight13: <Petrosianic> Who the heck wouldn't think that we wouldn't add each other to the ignore list after all this stuff btwn you and me?
May-02-09  ScorpionInstinct: Poor Steinitz must've gotten tired it's 10th round for the old man.. 0-0-0!!!AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Jan-19-11  Llawdogg: It is kind of strange to see the world champion castle long into danger rather than castle short into safety. Also, Steinitz never moved a rook again for the rest of the game. It was definitely his worst effort of the entire match.
Jan-19-11  kingfu: Steinitz was 58 and Lasker 30. From the many discussions about Karpov, Korchnoi and others, we see that playing strength declines in old age.

Sometimes castling on opposite wings signals a fierce battle.

Sometimes it is a mistake. I have heard the phrase "Castling into it!" This happens a lot when French players castle Kingside!

Jan-19-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <kingfu> Lasker was born in 1868. So he was 26 years old when he played this match.
Jan-19-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <chancho: <kingfu> Lasker was born in 1868. So he was 26 years old when he played this match.>

Twenty-five, to push pedantry beyond its limits (he was born December 24).

Jan-19-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <keypusher> Yeah, you're right. The match ended on May 1894, so he was 25. I was going by this link:

http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/z4l...

Jan-20-11  kingfu: Playing Lasker at 25?

May I offer a draw, sire?

Jan-20-11  Llawdogg: Lasker was just hitting his stride here.
Jan-22-11  kingfu: Llawdogg,

I guess that draw offer was DECLINED!

Jan-22-11  DieHard: I don't think 0-0-0 was Steinitz's big error. His extended knight tour of Nh3-f4-d3-f2-d3 hurt him. Launching the f3-f4-f5 aggression from an inferior position didn't help either. Steinitz's theory expected attacks to be based on an advantage, not a disadvantage. He really was not himself.
Apr-07-12  solskytz: 20. 0-0-0 doesn't look too bad - but should have followed most probably by 21. Kb2, holding it all quite nicely
Dec-23-18  sakredkow: Lasker castles manually. Er, Emanuelly.
Sep-06-19  Ulhumbrus: Steinitz plays the eccentric 4 f3 in the opening and suffers a beating. It may be however that Lasker has to employ masterly play in order to gain the victory.
Dec-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: You can see the final position in this contemporary picture, which is also included in Huebner's book:

<http://www.chessarch.com/gallery/in...>

Since there's no clock, and no spectators or officials visible, I wonder if it's posed. Not a position I would have cared to pose with if I were Steinitz.

Dec-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: <keypusher>

Posed.
https://en.chessbase.com/post/50-ga...

Jan-04-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jambow: <Nice piece coordianation by Lasker.>

By all means I think of piece coordination as the defining element of Lasker's style.. May the 4th be with you.

Jan-04-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <DieHard: I don't think 0-0-0 was Steinitz's big error. His extended knight tour of Nh3-f4-d3-f2-d3 hurt him. Launching the f3-f4-f5 aggression from an inferior position didn't help either. Steinitz's theory expected attacks to be based on an advantage, not a disadvantage. He really was not himself.>

Not to mention delaying forever the development of the queen's bishop.

Jan-04-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: 7. e4 was bad. Especially after uh 4. f3

7. e4 Qh4+ 8. g3 Nxc3 9. bxc3 Qe7


click for larger view

Steinitz was psychologically traumatized at this point of the match. He just could not fathom what was happening to him.

Lasker was that good in his time.

Mar-29-20  joddon: to get your king trapped by pawns is not a modern day Grandmaster thing to do...Lasker was playing a badly drunk opponent I think....once health withers so does the chess.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Lasker vs. Steinitz
by c3230
Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894), Philadelphia
from -ER Lasker by fredthebear
Match Steinitz!
by docjan
Lasker takes a four game lead with vicious attack
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
!!
from lasker best games by brager
17
from Veliki majstori saha 7 LASKER (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
Quickly Perhaps Prickly QG Poked Fredthebear
by fredthebear
Game 10, Lasker leads 6-2 (7-3)
from 1894 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
Match Lasker!
by docjan
50_Queenless middlegames
by whiteshark
Lasker vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC