chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Wilhelm Steinitz vs Emanuel Lasker
Steinitz - Lasker World Championship Match (1894), Montreal CAN, rd 4, Mar-24
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Greco Gambit (C53)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 100 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 45 more Steinitz/Lasker games
sac: 20.Nf4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Finish of this game shows that even those best of best can have troubles with handling of Rook endgames. Steinitz could have won easily by playing 51.e7! Kd7 52.hxg5 hxg5 53.d6! His order of moves could have blown the win but Lasker went wrong too with 53...Ra3+? Instead of that 53...Ra8 54.Ke4 Rf8 seems to hold the game.
Nov-20-06  euripides: <honza Steinitz could have won easily by playing 51.e7! Kd7 52.hxg5 hxg5 53.d6!>

Intersting. I don't immediately see how White wins the final position in that line. I would have thought rook checks and/or the advance of the g pawn might hold ? In any case can't Black play <51.e7> Re8 e.g. 52.Re6+ Kd7 53.d6 fails to Kxe6 ?

Nov-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <euripides> In that line, 53.Rxh6 gxh4 54.d6 or 53...Rxe7 54.hxg5
Nov-20-06  euripides: <calli> thanks, I'd missed that. Also I'd missed that with pawns on e7 and d6 the fortress can often be broken simply by Rf8- I was thinking of some fortresses involving two connected passed pawns when one is a rooks's pawn. So 51.e7 does look right.
Nov-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Btw, my Fritz 8's database as well as a book "The Games of Wilhelm Steinitz, First World Chess Champion" edited by Sid Pickard and published by Pickard & Son, Publishers, Dallas 1995 give a different finish of this game since move 55:

55.Kf4 Ra8 56.e7 Re8 57.Kf5 g3 58.Kf6 Kd7 59.d6 g2 60.Rg1 1-0

I don't think that it can be correct as it makes very little sense. In that case 56.e7?? would be awful blunder (56.Kxg4 wins easily) and 57...g3?? (why not 57...Rxe7?) 58.Kf6?? (58.Re6+! Kd7 59.d6 or 58...Kxd5 59.Kf6 g2 60.Re1 wins) 58...Kd7?? (58...g2!=) would be pretty strange sequence of mistakes. Cg.com's gamescore looks more reasonable.

Nov-20-06  who: Strange that Steinitz didn't try to keep the extra piece with 20.gxh4. The computer agrees that white is absolutely winning. For instance 20.gxh4 Rg3+ 21.hxg3 Bxd1 22.Ba2! (maybe this is the move Steinitz missed) Kh8 23.Raxe1 leaves white with a won position.


click for larger view

or 20.gxh4 Raf8 21.Nf4! R3xf4 22.Rxf4 Rxf4 (22...Bxd1? 23.Ba2+) 23.Qb3+


click for larger view

and after 23...R/Qf7 24.Ba2 wins otherwise 24.exf4

Nov-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Cg.com's gamescore looks more reasonable.>

It is correct according to Whyld's book of Lasker games. His source is the newspaper "New York Recorder" on 26-3-1894. For some reason, quite a few of the Steinitz-Lasker match games have weird scores in a lot of internet files.

Feb-29-08  Knight13: OMG Lasker "hanged" a bunch of pieces and got away with it...

And the final position is "LOL."

Sep-20-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Honza Cervenka: ...<Instead of that 53...Ra8 54.Ke4 Rf8 seems to hold the game.>>


click for larger view

E.g. 55.Re3 Rf4+ 56.Kd3 Ra4 57.Re2 Ra8 58.Ke4 Rf8= or 55.Kd4 g4=

Jul-27-09  elo1xxx: Dont 22.Ra8 immediately won the game ?
Nov-06-09  jonico: Why Black didn't play 18...Qxe3+? Please answer me...
Jan-18-11  Llawdogg: Why didn't black play 18 ... Qxe3+? Because white simply answers 19 Kg2 and holds everything together with no problems, surprisingly enough.

This is the key part of the game, no doubt about it. 19 Nxd5! and 20 Nf4! are great knight maneuvers by Steinitz. 21 Qb3+ was the only good move.

But how about 22 Ra5! Silman suggests this move and it looks good to me.

May-22-13  Monocle: I was looking at this game in the CB Light database, and there it finishes:

55.Kf4 Ra8 56.e7 Re8 57.Kf5 g3 58.Kf6 Kd7 59.d6 g2 60.Rg1 1-0

Even just blitzing through the game, I could see that 57...g2 would be a blindingly obvious draw, so I'm glad to find a more plausible ending to the game here.

Apr-30-14  zanzibar: Play was adjourned at 6pm with Steinitz sealing the move (29.b5), then two hours for dinner, and resumption at 8pm.

paraphrased from New York Daily Tribune, 1894.03.25

The ending of the game was given there as:

55.Kf5 Ra8 56.e7 Re8 57.Kf6 g3 58.Kf7 Kd7 59.d6 g2 60.Rg1 1-0

Agreeing with <CG>.

(NY Daily Tribune is one day before NY Recorder fwiw)

Apr-02-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  pavaobjazevic: It seems that 52... g4 instead of 52... Ra4 draw the game 52... g4 53.Ke4 g3 54.e7 Kxe7 55.Kf3+ Kd6 56.Kxg3 Kxd5
Apr-02-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  pavaobjazevic: Also draw with 53...Ra8 instead of 53...Ra3+

The possible line would be

53... Ra8 54.Ke3 Kxd5 55.e7 Ke6 56.Kf3+ Kf7 57.e8Q+ Rxe8 58.Rxe8

This is one of my favorite chess games because if Steinitz and Lasker made big mistakes in a World Championship game, it is OK that we make mistakes as well!!!

Apr-15-20  sidd95: Why wouldn't the white just take the black queen in move 23 (23 Qxf7+)? Isn't that a mate just after?
Apr-15-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <sidd95> What mate do you see?
Apr-15-20  sidd95: <TheFocus>, my bad...the king would just take it then, sry
Apr-15-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: Steinitz completely missed 22. Ra5 1-0


click for larger view

Apr-15-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <WorstPlayerEver: Steinitz completely missed 22. Ra5 1-0>

I have looked at annotations of this game by Lasker, Steinitz, Gunsberg, Hoffer, and Mason and all them never mention it. Curious. Is there an annotator that did see it, and suggest it later?

Apr-16-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: < TheFocus: <WorstPlayerEver: Steinitz completely missed 22. Ra5 1-0> I have looked at annotations of this game by Lasker, Steinitz, Gunsberg, Hoffer, and Mason and all them never mention it. Curious. Is there an annotator that did see it, and suggest it later?>

J.D. Seguin apparently pointed it out at the time in La Strategie, per Huebner's 2008 book on the match.

Apr-16-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: PS it was already analyzed by a cg user. Usually when I analyze something, an engine request already have been made.
Apr-16-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <WorstPlayerEver: PS it was already analyzed by a cg user. Usually when I analyze something, an engine request already have been made.>

Thank you <WPE>.

<Llawdogg> <But how about 22 Ra5! Silman suggests this move and it looks good to me.>

I only have Silman's <Complete Endgame Course> and <How to Reassess Your Chess>.

I bought <Reassess> directly from Silman. I recommend both of those books to add to anyone's library.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 206
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by demirchess
yatutahtetam's favorite games
by yatutahtetam
My favorite games from WCC matches
by skytzo985
Game 206
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by FRoeten
Match Steinitz!
by amadeus
Italian Game: Classical. Greco Gambit (C53) 1-0 New York
from Italiano Job c3d4s Mobbed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Lasker vs. Steinitz
by c3230
Rook endings by Levenfish and Smyslov
by peckinpah
Steinitz "masters" rook ending to tie match
from EG Rookie Plus Endgames Rock Fredthebear by fredthebear
Greco Gambit
from Italian Game by inlimbo777
The Hardest Wins
by crwynn
game 5
from 28b_Meister der Turmendspiele (1890-1914) by whiteshark
Game 4, Match tied 2-2 (2-2)
from 1894 World Chess Championship by Penguincw
R+2 Ps vs R+P
by Pawsome
converting the passed pawn
from chess strategems vii - under construction by gauer
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Steinitz "masters" rook ending to tie match
from World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
Introduction
from Lessons in Chess Strategy by agb2002
Game 206
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by Chessdreamer
1-ig-eco53
by classicalwin2
plus 4 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC