chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Aleksa Strikovic vs Mihai Suba
Seville op (1994), Seville ESP, rd 9, Jan-29
Formation: King's Indian Attack (A07)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more A Strikovic/Suba game
sac: 26...Qxd6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-29-08  Kings Indian: King's Indian's Dad here

Yes, this was easier than I thought it would be. I got yesterday's wrong. I carried out the moves to checkmate, because sacrificing a queen needs to lead to a sure advantage, at the very least.

Oh yes, I am not a chess player, or a doctor for that matter.

Oct-30-08  mworld: <SufferingBruin: patzer of patzers, I share your joy. I got this one, too. And to mworld, thanks for that link! :)>

hey, i saw that you did sign up! congrats. Once your RD drops below 50 the problems they throw at you stabilize and you will find that you get better at them and then they throw you increasingly harder and harder ones as your rating climbs.

When i started on there I equalized at about 1150 and climbed my way up to a 1430 ish one with improving accuracy.

glad you enjoy it like i do :)

Nov-05-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: For the Wednesday Oct 29, 2008 puzzle solution, Black takes advantage of the pinned pawn on e5 to win a piece after 26...Qxd6! and then pull off a mate-in-two after 27. exd6 Re1+ 28. Kf2 Bh4#.
Oct-29-19  groog: Why did white play 26. N-d6?
Oct-29-19  mel gibson: I saw that in about 20 seconds.
It's a fun game.
Oct-29-19  ragtag: < Oct-29-08 Premium Chessgames Member chrisowen: < With Bd8 it sets the trap in which the white knight plunges head first. Perhaps white should've re-took with the bishop, the sac exchange doesnt pay dividends. >>

When did chrisowen start his written stuttering? What happened? Is there no cure at all?

Oct-29-19  Chesgambit: Kf2 Bh4#
Oct-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  malt: Have 26...Q:d6 27.Bh5
(27.ed6 Re1+ 28.Kf2 Bh4# )

27...Qe6

Oct-29-19  1stboard: Reminds me of Olafsson vs Fischer Portroz 1958 .....
Oct-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: What a wonderful combination!
Oct-29-19  mikealando: <what a wonderful combination!> Indeed and a fabulous sac to cap it all off - one of those thankfully frequent lightning bolts from the chess blue that help infuse super energy and colour into the day.
Oct-29-19  zb2cr: I thought I remembered this one. Across 11 years, the fact that Black wins additional material (already being the exchange up) by 26. ... Qxd6.

If White takes, 27. exd6, Re1+; 28. Kf1, Bh4#. And as my younger self remarked, if White declines and tries 27. Qf7, Qc7 takes care of the mate threat.

Oct-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  mjmorri: Everybody loves to see a knight posted on the third or sixth rank...for different reasons, of course.
Oct-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  saffuna: White had so many chances to move his queen bishop and protect the back rank.
Oct-29-19  charlesdecharemboul: As ever, after having watched the solution, it's so simple!
Oct-29-19  jacc123456: What is wrong with the site? Can´t see the game.
Oct-29-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  gawain: What a beautiful puzzle! At first the Black attack looks entirely unpromising. I did not even see anything plausible for Black to try. Then the queen "sacrifice" emerged, which (when accepted) led to a back rank check, which miraculously made it possible for the useless-looking bishop to deliver mate!
Oct-29-19  TheaN: Nice and uncomplicated, Black wins a piece after 26....Qxd6 -+ on penalty of 27.exd6? Re1+ 28.Kf2 Bh4#, which is a neat mate. White has options a plenty to not take on d6 but goes a rook down, a deficit that's not playable in the position at hand.
Oct-29-19  drollere: <When did chrisowen start his written stuttering?>

the rest of us merely block the user ID, and leave personal problems to a personal solution.

Oct-29-19  TheaN: Oh wait, I did this one before, with quite a bit more in depth analysis than now, which is a bit unnecessary.

<drollere: <When did chrisowen start his written stuttering?>

the rest of us merely block the user ID, and leave personal problems to a personal solution.>

Typically the 'stutter' posts seem to have been removed. Still don't know why it happened and/or why they got removed now. Never blocked Chris though it had no additional value, but interested to see where it comes from or how the posts were generated.

Oct-29-19  Damenlaeuferbauer: After long pondering, my old Romanian friend Mihai finally found the win of white's knight or a mate in 3 moves with 26.-,Qxd6! 27.exd6 (otherwise a piece has gone west),Re1+ 28.Kf2,Bh4#.
Oct-29-19  seneca16: White might have done better to play 17. f5 and exchange pieces on e5, hoping eventually to play f6 breaking through. The white square bishop would not be weak since it would threaten to go to g6 or eventually e6. Just a thought.
Oct-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: White's decisive mistake appears to be the self-pin 22. Qd1? Nh4 -+ (-2.03 @ 30 ply, Stockfish 10).

Instead, White gets reasonably good drawing chances with 22. Qf2 ⩱ (-0.61 @ 30 ply, Stockfish 10).

Earlier, White made a near decisive error with 21. c3?, allowing 21...dxc3 -+ (-1.90 @ 26 ply, Stockfish 10).

Instead, White could have secured a level or better game with 21. Bd2 (+0.36 @ 31 ply, Stockfish 10).

Oct-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: <When did chrisowen start his written stuttering? > When he found Chess Enlightenment in that emarald site.
Oct-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Perhaps white should've re-took with the bishop, the sac exchange doesnt pay dividends.> When I initially looked at the position after 24...Nxf3, I thought the exchange sacrifice 25. Rxf3 Bxf3 -+ was the losing move.

However, the computer indicates the position is also lost after 24...Bxf3 25. Bxf3 Rh4 -+ with a decisive Kingside attack.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Continuation Kf2 Bh4# is an X-Ray Mate!
from X-Ray Tactic-- OTB Examples by ChessCoachClark
King's Indian Attack
from KING'S INDIAN ATTACK by medisynergi
26...? (Wednesday, October 29)
from POTD Kings Indian Attack by takchess
Interesting Games
by Easy Point
26...? (October 29, 2008)
from Wednesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
26...? (Wednesday, October 29)
from Puzzle of the Day 2008 by Phony Benoni
26...Qxd6! takes advantage of a pin masking a mate threat
from Pinning by patzer2
iywo's favorite games
by iywo
King's Indian Attack
from PUZZLES OF THE DAY by gambitfan
King's Indian Attack
from KING'S INDIAN ATTACK by gambitfan
King's Indian Attack ( Vezir fedası)
from Sacrificial Games by osmanseza
29/10/08, 26. ...?
from Chessgames Puzzles: Medium/Easy by ed gantro
queen sac leads to picturesque mate.
from games beyond reach! by kevin86


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC