chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Fridrik Olafsson vs Mikhail Tal
Portoroz Interzonal (1958), Portoroz SLO, rd 18, Sep-04
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Hedgehog Defense (A30)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more F Olafsson/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-24-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: A great example of the other side of Tal - the player who could get draws from tough positions.

I think Olafsson could have won this game but I cannot see where he went wrong.

Apr-24-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 45.Kd8 might be the winner.
Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: In his <Life and Games>, Tal writes about this game:

<I played the opening very light-heartedly, quickly exchanged several pieces, but failed to make an accurate, very essential move. I offered a draw immediately after this. Olafsson declined. Only then did I look more deeply into the position, and realized that my offer of a draw had been somewhat tactless. In short, my opponent adjourned the game in a completely won position… We… began looking through the possibilities in the quiet, dull rook ending against the Icelander, every minute becoming more and more convinced that things were very, very bad.

In the end we hit upon an idea which at first sight seemed completely absurd, whereby I simply moved my king away from the enemy’s passed pawn, but where we found some ways for my opponent to go wrong. In the alternative case my opponent would have to demonstrate some elementary technical knowledge, whereas here I could lose much more quickly, but Olafsson would also have the chance to make a mistake.

Koblents and I showed our analysis to Lev Abramov, the leader of our delegation, and asked him what he, a chess master, would do in such a case. He unhesitatingly opted for the second possibility… I resumed my game against Olafsson, and tried to play as confidently as possible, especially since Olafsson, as was his habit, had thought for a long time over his sealed move – 45 minutes – and had relatively little time left. Of course, in normal circumstances this would have been sufficient to win, but Olafsson also became nervous. When I led my king away from his pawn, he sank into thought, and used up a further six minutes. His first move was correct, his second also, but on the third move he went wrong, and a drawn position was reached by force.>

Can someone point out where exactly did Olafsson go wrong?

Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Smyslov gives 46 d7..Re3+ 47 Kd8..a3
48 Ra8! (found by Konstantinopolsky)
"and white must win" eg 48..f5
49 Kc7..Rd3 50 Rxa3 or 48..a2
49 Rxa2..f4 50 Ra5.
Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <plang> Thanks. Does he say anything about 46.d7 Re3+ 47.Kd8 a3 48.Ra8 f5 49.Kc7 <Rc3+>? I still don't see how White is winning here: 50.Kd6 Rd3+ 51.Ke6 a2! (51...fxg4 52.d8=Q Rxd8 53.Rxd8 and White is winning - it's important to divert the white king from e6) 52.Rxa2 fxg4 53.Ra5 Rxd7 54.Kxd7 Kf6 and we've reached a tablebase draw.

Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: No, that is all the analysis he provides (at least for 46 d7).
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Interzonals 1958: Portoroz
by capybara
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part three by brucemubayiwa
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part three by Alenrama
Interzonal Tournament Game #18
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
96e The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 5
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC