chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Fridrik Olafsson vs Mikhail Tal
Portoroz Interzonal (1958), Portoroz SLO, rd 18, Sep-04
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Hedgehog Defense (A30)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more F Olafsson/Tal games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-24-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: A great example of the other side of Tal - the player who could get draws from tough positions.

I think Olafsson could have won this game but I cannot see where he went wrong.

Apr-24-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: 45.Kd8 might be the winner.
Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: In his <Life and Games>, Tal writes about this game:

<I played the opening very light-heartedly, quickly exchanged several pieces, but failed to make an accurate, very essential move. I offered a draw immediately after this. Olafsson declined. Only then did I look more deeply into the position, and realized that my offer of a draw had been somewhat tactless. In short, my opponent adjourned the game in a completely won position… We… began looking through the possibilities in the quiet, dull rook ending against the Icelander, every minute becoming more and more convinced that things were very, very bad.

In the end we hit upon an idea which at first sight seemed completely absurd, whereby I simply moved my king away from the enemy’s passed pawn, but where we found some ways for my opponent to go wrong. In the alternative case my opponent would have to demonstrate some elementary technical knowledge, whereas here I could lose much more quickly, but Olafsson would also have the chance to make a mistake.

Koblents and I showed our analysis to Lev Abramov, the leader of our delegation, and asked him what he, a chess master, would do in such a case. He unhesitatingly opted for the second possibility… I resumed my game against Olafsson, and tried to play as confidently as possible, especially since Olafsson, as was his habit, had thought for a long time over his sealed move – 45 minutes – and had relatively little time left. Of course, in normal circumstances this would have been sufficient to win, but Olafsson also became nervous. When I led my king away from his pawn, he sank into thought, and used up a further six minutes. His first move was correct, his second also, but on the third move he went wrong, and a drawn position was reached by force.>

Can someone point out where exactly did Olafsson go wrong?

Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Smyslov gives 46 d7..Re3+ 47 Kd8..a3
48 Ra8! (found by Konstantinopolsky)
"and white must win" eg 48..f5
49 Kc7..Rd3 50 Rxa3 or 48..a2
49 Rxa2..f4 50 Ra5.
Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <plang> Thanks. Does he say anything about 46.d7 Re3+ 47.Kd8 a3 48.Ra8 f5 49.Kc7 <Rc3+>? I still don't see how White is winning here: 50.Kd6 Rd3+ 51.Ke6 a2! (51...fxg4 52.d8=Q Rxd8 53.Rxd8 and White is winning - it's important to divert the white king from e6) 52.Rxa2 fxg4 53.Ra5 Rxd7 54.Kxd7 Kf6 and we've reached a tablebase draw.

Mar-24-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: No, that is all the analysis he provides (at least for 46 d7).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
96e The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 5
by whiteshark
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part three by Alenrama
Interzonal Tournament Game #18
from Road to the Championship - Mik Tal by Fischer of Men
Rook vs Rook
from Endgames World champions - part three by brucemubayiwa
Interzonals 1958: Portoroz
by capybara

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC