chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mikhail Tal vs Aleksandar Matanovic
Bled (1961), Bled YUG, rd 5, Sep-09
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Saemisch Variation. Accelerated (E24)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Tal/A Matanovic games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-10-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: After move 38, Tal notes: <Black apparently considers the position hopeless and thus shortens his resistance. A particularly interesting ending would have materialized after 38...Rg4 39.Bxf5 Rxg7 40.hxg7 Nf6 41.Bh7 Ng8! 42.Bxg8 Kf6 43.Bh7 Kxg7 44.Bf5 Kf6 45.Bc8 b6.>

Tal concludes by saying, <"...one thing is certain, it would be most difficult to find a way of winning, if one could be found at all.">

Now with the aid of a computer we know that White is indeed winning in this variation indicated by Tal.

Can anyone provide the winning line after 45.Bc8 b6?

Feb-04-16  southeuro: any thoughts as to why Tal ignored the knight on f4? is it b/c of Qf6 and Bg4 sac after? thoughts? thx
Feb-04-16  southeuro: <pawn and two> at first, I thought white would simply come with king and hold f5 square twice, with bishop and king. since black has no useful moves his king would have to yield ground eventually. but then I realised he can simply wait on dark squares g5-f6. don't see how white can break thru really. e-f pawns too fast if king tries to run to queenside? I see a strange variation where king goes to q-side, comes back to relieve bishop, when bishop goes back to c8 to force a6-a5, then goes to q-side again. Problem with that is, black can go Ke5 with f5 next cutting of Bc8... then maybe white should get to Bd1 (after which black's king will be on e5 with f5 pushed) with idea of Ba4-Bb5, but black can still play a5 and now white king can't go there anymore as e-f pawns are too strong. Are you sure this is a win for white?
Sep-03-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: I took a look at Tal's notes to the game, aided by Stockfish.

<any thoughts as to why Tal ignored the knight on f4? is it b/c of Qf6 and Bg4 sac after? thoughts? thx>

Yes, exactly, although taking the knight was playable. Tal: <After the text-move (12....Nf4), the variation 13.Nxf4 exf4 14.Bxf4 Qf6 15.Qd2 Bxg4 16.Bg2 was quite acceptable, with White stunting Black's counterplay.>

In this variation, Black could play 14....Bxf4 immediately, after which 15.Bg2 loses to ...Rxe4+, but 15.Be2 is playable.

After 28....Ne8:


click for larger view

Tal: <After the text-move both players were short of time. The realisation of White's material superiority is by no means easy, since the king's bishop is quite passive. I wasted the remaining minutes trying to find a satisfactory continuation after 29.Bxc5 dxc5 30.Rxe5+ Kd6. In reply to 31.Rf5, one possibility is 31...Ng6 and if 31.Rxe8 Bxe8 32.g5 then 32....Ke5(!!) 33.gxf6 Rh1 which is probably even better for Black. Having verified this and being in time-trouble, I opted for a tranquil continuation.>

The engine doubts Tal's evaluation of the final position, but 32....Ke5 is quite a move, and definitely the best Black has. Nevertheless, 29.Bxc5 was indeed the best, with the continuation 29....dxc5 30.Rxe5+ Kd6 31.Rg5! (threatening 32.e5+) Ng6 32.Qe3 Kc7 33.e5 Rb6 34.e6 Bxe6 35.Rxg6 fxg6 36.Qe5+ and wins.

< Pawn and Two: After move 38, Tal notes: <Black apparently considers the position hopeless and thus shortens his resistance. A particularly interesting ending would have materialized after 38...Rg4 39.Bxf5 Rxg7 40.hxg7 Nf6 41.Bh7 Ng8! 42.Bxg8 Kf6 43.Bh7 Kxg7 44.Bf5 Kf6 45.Bc8 b6.> Tal concludes by saying, <"...one thing is certain, it would be most difficult to find a way of winning, if one could be found at all.">

Now with the aid of a computer we know that White is indeed winning in this variation indicated by Tal.

Can anyone provide the winning line after 45.Bc8 b6?>

Tal's suggestion was <gradually forcing the advance of the e- and f-pawns to the fourth rank, when the bishop would pin them both down from the front while the king skirted them via h4 and finally took them. The plan is workable in principle, but the pity is that at a suitable moment Black plays ...a6 and ...b5. If White wanted to frustrate this with a4 his bishop would be even more tightly hemmed in and it would be even more difficult for it to return. For that reason White would probably have to permit ...b5 which would lead to a reduction in material. A detailed analysis of such an ending would take too much space, but one thing is certain, it would be most difficult to find a way of winning, if one could be found at all.>

I don't want to express a definitive opinion about this ending, but SF (i) has no compunction about playing a3-a4 (ii) has no difficulty bringing the bishop back. When I play the ending out (with the engine really making the decisions for both sides) the Black e- and f- pawns eventually do advance, and White wins them. If I override the engine and hold them back, the White king eventually penetrates down the h-file. So, I think the ending really was won for White. But I'd be curious to see what a stronger player thought.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal
by newfiex
p.220
from The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal by phillipecorrente
5th round
from Bled sep-oct 1961 (rounds 1-10) by Kopenhagener
Game 42
from The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal by nakul1964
Tal Fever
by chocobonbon
Game 42
from Life and Games (Tal) by Qindarka
Game 42
from Life and Games (Tal) by isfsam
remembering Tal
by Yopo
Game 42
from The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal by MoonlitKnight
Game 42
from The Life and Games of Mikhail Tal by Retarf


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC