Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jon Kristinsson vs Mikhail Tal
"Mikhail to the Chief" (game of the day Aug-13-2016)
Reykjavik (1964), Reykjavik ISL, rd 5, Jan-19
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Knight Variation (B43)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 2,926 more games of Tal
sac: 15...Nxe3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
May-01-05  WorldChampeen: 14. ...Qc6 , right into a Knight gosh, that's why he's called the Magician of Riga...

May-01-05  Catholic Bishop: nice double penetration of the bishop pair
Dec-16-05  Eatman: Well Qc6 was pretty much forced (since Nc4 was hanging) Tal had to foresee what was going on a move earlier at least. It seemed white were doing okay and started the pawnroller on queenside, but Tal managed to disturb white's king in time.
Sep-20-07  DiscerningKing: Interesting Game .. Needs to be posted as "A GAME OF THE DAY!"
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: White's 17.Kh2 looks like an inexplicable blunder to me. Why not 17.Na5 to save the knight (17...Nc4+ 18.Kh1 Nxa5 19.b4 Bd4 20.bxa5 Bxa1 21.Rxa1 would leave Black with R+N vs. Q+2P)? Even 17.Rf2 to try to save the exchange seems to leave White an advantage (the knight at e3 can't retreat)...
Mar-23-08  kereru: 10...Ne5 isn't the best move if Black want to play for a win. Kristinsson was one of the weaker players in the tournament and when he saw a chance to "force" a draw with the great Tal by 13.Ndxb5 axb5 14.Nxb5 Qc6 15.Na7 Qc7 16.Nb5= (16.Nxc8!? is unclear) he grabbed it. Of course any normal GM would have grudgingly accepted the draw, but Tal was not a normal GM.

15...Nxe3?? is objectively terrible, White only has to save the knight with 17.Na5 or 17.Ne5 and Black has no compensation for his substantial material deficit. He can give a discovered check and he can win the exchange, but that's all.

White panicked at the threat of a discovered check. After 17.Kh2?? White still has a decent game, but the position is unclear, just how Tal likes it. Tal simply outplayed him after that, winning with an ingenious king's side attack.

Jul-23-08  mate2900s: wow this is why we love chess
Feb-13-11  kereru: Proof that there *is* such a thing as bluff in chess.
Aug-13-16  Delboy: Most players would be happy to leave just one such game to posterity. Tal however played so many amazing games that this one might not even feature in his '100 most memorable' ones collection. Thanks, CG, for unearthing and celebrating it today
Aug-13-16  newzild: "There are two kinds of sacrifices: sound ones, and mine."

Kristinsson must have been a pretty weak player, because even I saw that 17. Kh2?? was a blunder.

You really have to admire Tal's balls.

Aug-13-16  RealCS: I always wonder a out games like this... did Mikhail actually had all of that in mind, or was it just move by move pragmatism? Who knows.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <newzild> -- By no stretch of the imagination can Jristinsson be called a 'weak player': he went on to win the Icelandic championship twice in the 1970s, and that is a very competitive event. Iceland has more GMs per head of population than any other country. However, he was pretty young and relatively inexperienced when this was played -- in his first master tournament, facing a legendary world champion. Errors are understandable.

The material balance of R/B/N vs Queen is a fascinating one. In theory, the pieces should win - but if they lack coordination and the Queen takes the initiative, it can be better. I once drew with a GM with such an active Queen; Kasparov won some games with the Q.

Aug-13-16  mel gibson: Silicon brains seem to pick up mistakes.
22 f5 ?

should have been
22 f4xe5

Then the game turns into a very tight one & probably a draw - at least according to DR4 64 bit.

Aug-14-16  newzild: <Domdaniel>

Yes, I read that in his bio too. But he won those championships in the 1970s - this game was played in 1964.

Quite a lot of water under the bridge between those dates and plenty of time from him to improve from being a "pretty weak player" to IM strength.

Aug-16-16  kevin86: The bishops take this one over.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Amazing Talness
from Oginschile's favorite games by Oginschile
52 games better than that other Tal game.
by ughaibu
dedicated to Tal + others
by hartkoka
Round 5 January 19
from Reykjavik 1964 by Tabanus
Sicilian Defense: Kan. Knight Variation
from MKD's Sicilian Defense Black by MKD
Provocative and simple gem.
from bitko's 2nd collection by bitko
With sacrifices
from Riding a storm - a beautiful defense by Grega
newbie inspiration's favorite games
by newbie inspiration
from Queen sacrifices 1 by obrit
from JonathanJ's favorite games by JonathanJ
Sicilian Kan. Knight Variation (B43) 0-1 Q sac into crossfire
from Sicilians All Sorts of Sicilians by Fredthebear by fredthebear
from 52d_Middlegames_3 pieces for a Queen by whiteshark
sicilian defense
from benjobench's tal games by benjobench
Hail to Tal!
from bishops rule! by kevin86
Little-Known Smasher
from andrewjsacks' Remarkable Games by andrewjsacks
Mikhail to the Chief!
from Alapin 2...Nd5 ....4.Bc4 gambit line by Nova
Book of Samurai's favorite games 2
by Book of Samurai
Kan Q Sac
from JamesDoyle's favourite (Tal) games by JamesDoyle
Round 5
from Tal at Reykjavik 1964 by jessicafischerqueen
Sicilian Kan. Knight Variation (B43) 0-1 Q sac into crossfire
from T Players Tease Fredthebear by fredthebear
plus 25 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC