Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Weaver Warren Adams vs Sidney Norman Bernstein
"Dream Weaver" (game of the day Jan-13-2015)
US Championship (1936), New York, NY USA, rd 7, May-03
Sicilian Defense: Nimzowitsch. Advance Variation (B29)  ·  1-0



explore this opening
find similar games 3 more W Adams/S Bernstein games
sac: 16.Rxd5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-19-09  Jesspatrick: The maneuver 10.Bb5-a4-b3 achieved nothing and practically let Black equalize. Other 10th moves should be considered here. 10.Be2 10.g4!? but 10.a3 with the idea of Bc4-a2 is met stopped with 10...Na5

Now, I speculate that Adams sensed that he'd let his opponent back into the game, and this factored into his decision to sacrifice the Exchange on move 15. The sacrifice has great practical value, since defense is not easy to organize. Also, Bernstein was notorious for getting himself into time trouble. He probably only had minutes left before Adams stunned him with 22.Bh6

Jun-20-14  jrofrano: I have annotated this game available here:
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Dream Weaver.
Jan-13-15  Abdel Irada: <He probably only had minutes left before Adams stunned him with 22.Bh6>

On the other hand, being stunned doesn't tend to be good for one's game even with plenty of time on the clock.

Jan-13-15  Abdel Irada: Nice finish, incidentally, if Black takes the bishop:

<24. ...Kxg7

25. Qg5+, Kf8

26. Qh6+, Kxe7

27. Qd6#>

Jan-13-15  goodevans: <Jesspatrick: The maneuver 10.Bb5-a4-b3 achieved nothing>

... apart from control of the crucial d5 square and contributing to a healthy lead in development.

<... and practically let Black equalize.>

After 12.Bb3 black's next four moves see him trade off his only three developed pieces for a fragile material advantage. Nowhere near equality in my book.

Jan-13-15  morfishine: A powerful, positional bind as evidenced by Black's almost complete inability to find a constructive move, much less plan

Having played 20...Qe8 perhaps Black should've tried 21...Bd8 (to at the least, remain consistent) and held his breath. He certainly had no time for 21...Rc7


Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: This game's checkmating pattern kinda reminded me of Capablanca vs NN, 1918.

Of course, if black plays 24...Kf8, then it's not quite the same.

Jan-13-15  Bycotron: @ goodevans, I had very similar thoughts to Jesspatrick about 10.Bb5 played by white in this game. Your post made me curious to discover the truth of the position and white's 10th move, so I fired up Rybka to help me out.

Rybka supports the conclusion that the move is a very significant mistake by white, let me see if I can explain why.

First of all, it gives black the option of justifying his c7 knight simply by 10...Nxb5 = (Rybka) when white has not increased his development at all and will soon see the position truly is dead equal, eg. 11.Nxb5 a6 12.Nd6+ Bxd6 13.Rxd6 and I'm certainly not feeling nearly as confident with white as I was before his tenth move! How can he make progress against the stout black position with no weaknesses?

10...a6?! is a gamble by black. As indicated, 10...Nxb5 was the most obvious and probably best way to take advantage of white's slip. Now white can bail out with 11.Be2 when we must still nevertheless acknowledge 10.Bb5?! was a mistake because black now controls b5 which he can either use to expand his Queenside pawns to attack the white King, or place a piece on (eg Nb5) to control important squares in the white camp.

11.Ba4?! b5
12.Bb3 Na5
13.Qe2 Nxb3+
14.axb3 and look how black's position is improved! His Bb7 is free, white's Bb3 is gone, white's King's castle is compromised, and black owns most of the space on the Queenside around white's King!

You indicated that black's next three moves lead "nowhere near equality," thus justifying the entire 10.Bb5 plan, but this cannot be the case.

Look at the position after white's 14th move and black has done more than equalize, he is obviously better and Rybka confirms the advantage has switched hands (from .7 before white's 10th, to .3 before black's 14th). In material terms, white's questionable judgement has thrown away a whole pawn's worth of the advantage.

10.Bb5 was a very significant error by white, but black returned the favor when he played 14...Nd5?! instead of the most obvious move on the entire board 14...b4 when black remains very slightly on top after eg 15.Ne4 Nd5.

Black let white back into the game, white continued to play accurately, and when black slipped again with 20...Qe8 white cleaned up beautifully! White played a beautiful game here, but it was not perfect, and that's perfectly okay. :)

Premium Chessgames Member
  Gilmoy: Yah, I thought (at my quick-click replay speed) that <4..Nc7> kind of sucks, <10.Bb5> sucks more (just begging for 10..Nxb5), and <14..Nd5> was the final error. The petty maxim is that Black plays d5 to equalize, hence it follows that <piece>d5 does not fix Black's inherent congestion.

The exchange sac on d5 dovetails too well with K-side attack themes in Sicilian/Spanish (which means White already has several reasons to keep it high on his board-of-smiting). Deflecting e6 frees up canonical Ruy <21.Nf5>. Sicilian has the outright Nd5 sac just to get Nf5 (or, in some move permutations, you sac Nf5 to get Nd5, or offer two on d5/f5 and the one he doesn't get kills him). Theory was surely less prevalent back then (less complete, and much harder to disseminate, acquire, and study).

<Jesspatrick: ... stunned him with 22.Bh6> Well, only for 7-year-olds when their uncle first teaches them Ruy K-side attacks. Once White plants Nf5, deflecting g7 and Q-sees-g for mate is thematic in the position. That's <why> Ruy theory has Nf5 (and the laborious tours to get there), and Black defenses prevent it.

<22.Bh6> g6 surely fails on material (I can't see a mate by force). So that's too late to count as a prevention.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by wwall
Dream Weaver 1/13/15
from Puns I submitted by FSR
dream weaver
from More of Nova's favorite games by Nova
Sicilian Def: Nimzowitsch. Advance Var (B29) 1-0 Exchange sac
from Roundhouse Ruuks 5 by fredthebear
barb's favorite games 2
by barb
Alekhine's Block
by katar
Sicilian Def: Nimzowitsch. Advance Var (B29) 1-0 Exchange sac
from Short Straw Don't Draw FTB Sicilian Puzzlers by fredthebear
January 13: Dream Weaver
from Game of the Day 2015 by Phony Benoni
Sicilian Nimzowitch : Will be here .
from Sicilian by ISeth
Round 7 -- 3 May 1936
from 1936 US Championship by crawfb5
Chess Miniatures, Collection XVII
by PinkLedDoor

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC