chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Garry Kasparov vs Alexey Shirov
"Alexey Sheared Off" (game of the day Oct-12-2018)
Linares (2001), Linares ESP, rd 8, Mar-04
Spanish Game: Open Variations. Karpov Gambit (C80)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 41 times; par: 46 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 31 more Kasparov/Shirov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-12-02  bishop: The spectacular looking move 11.Ng5! was first played by Karpov in his 1978 world title match with Korchnoi. The following is quoted from Raymond Keene's book THE EVOLUTION OF CHESS OPENING THEOTY-"korchnoi described Karpov's 11th move as "the kind you find once in a century", and Harry Golombek was bold enough to declare "it is not a move you see readily. It can easily be overlooked." If now 11...Qxg5 12.Qf3 Kd7 13.Bd5! or 12...Bd7 13.Bxf7+ Ke7 14.Bd5 Nxe5 15.Qe2 with horrible threats. Korchnoi in fact, played 11...dxc3 and hung on with difficulty." Keene goes on to write that it was later established that the best line for Black are the moves played in the above game up to 17...dxc3 and he states that Black has compensation for the piece. Well, it looks like Kasparov has established that this compensation is not good enough.
Jul-14-02
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: I looked up some other games with this gambit. Here's some examples of the gambit winning, losing, and drawing.

Anand vs Ivan Sokolov, 1994 (0-1)

Kasparov vs Anand, 1995 (1-0)

Karpov vs Korchnoi, 1978 (1/2-1/2)

Mar-20-03  refutor: i think shirov is far too brave
Oct-29-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: Hehehehehe the debate continues, though I feel Shirov played very riskily in this game by advancing king side pawns, the interesting thing is that despite Anand having faced Sokolov's 11..Bd5 he did not use it in the match with Kasparov and instead used 11..dxc3
Oct-30-03  Drstrangelove: It's odd that a player as good as Shirov has never scored a point against Kasparov (at least not in this database)
Nov-22-03  seoulmama: Dr, Shirov has, like Anand, some kind of psychological block when it comes to playing Gazza and win.
Nov-22-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eggman: I don't find it odd that a player as good as Shirov would fail to ever score a point against a player as great as Kasparov. After all, how often does Kasparov ever lose?
Nov-22-03  PinkPanther: <It's odd that a player as good as Shirov has never scored a point against Kasparov (at least not in this database)>

Well no, he's never scored a full point against him in any given game, but he's drawn him plenty of times.

Nov-20-04  comcicomca: Black got good play for his piece, and came within a hair of equalizing. Probably, in time pressure, he missed the sting at the end of all the exchanges.
Nov-20-04  MoonlitKnight: Morozevich vs Ponomariov, 2004 is the newest contribution to this line.
Jan-15-05  SimonBrazil: <MoonlitKnight> The newest one: Grischuk vs Anand, 2005 , Wijk aan Zee, 2005
Jan-30-08  mistreaver: This variation was refuted by GM Gyimesi in Delchev-Gyimesi, Nova Gorica 2004 ( no game in database). that game went 21... d3!! 22 axb5 d2 23 bxa6 c2 24 Bxd2 Bxa1 25 Rxa1 Rhe8 26 a7 Kb7 27 a8=Q+ Rxa8 28 Rc1 1/2- 1/2 This is the variation that diverted ppl from 9 Nbd2 to 9Be3 Gyimesi is the founder of that novelty.
Seems like sometimes lower rated GMs can have great effect on opening theory.
Apr-06-08  mistreaver: I don't get why no1 ever played 12 ... Ke7 on black side. Is there any forced refutation? Cause i tryed that move few times and it worked well ( altought it happened on playchess against weaker opponents
Aug-09-08  alexrawlings: Can someone explain why Kasparov retreats the bishop with 28 Bb4 instead of playing 28 Bxc7 please?

Apr-06-09  alanelbaum: alexrawlings, I think it's because he wants to keep his c-pawn. If black takes it after 28. Bb4, then 29. Rxd4 seems strong. But if 28. Bxc7 Rxc6, then 29. Rxd4 doesn't work.
Apr-22-09  aazqua: Moves 30 and on are really quite comical. The problem with Shirov playing Kasparov is that Shirov likes to play a lot of speculative calculation intensive chess and Kasparov is the greatest player in history at aggressive, calculation intensive chess. Shirov throws a bunch of spagghetti on the wall and most of his opponents have trouble sorting it out. The problem with Kasparov is that he's just much better at it than Shirov so Shirov always ends up in a variant that is unfavorable to him. This game is an excellent case in point. It's hard to believe Kasparov wouldn't be extremely familiar with the "Karpov" Gambit and the last thing in the world that you want to do is to give Kasparov a piece for a couple pawns in a dynamic position. Kd7 looks like it can't possibly be right and sure enough, by the time Shirov gets his king sorted out Kasparov controls the files he needs to and has his pieces in the right place. G5 G4?? That cheeky pawn should be slapped back into position.
Apr-22-09  returnoftheking: Kasparov's score against Shirov can't be explained by just being better at calculating or tactics. More probably it's psychology that plays a big (additional) role.
Apr-04-12  Hesam7: According to theory 21. ... d3! is best and after 22. axb5 d2 Black has scored very well indeed. However a later improvement over Shirov's game is still possible:

24. ... Rd5 25. Ba5 (25. c6!? , Δ Rd3 & Re1) 25. ... Ra8 26. Rd3 Rxa5 27. Nxa5 Rxc5 28. Kf1 b4 29. Nb3 Kd5!! 30. Nxc5 Kxc5


click for larger view

<it [is] not clear how White [can] hold 4 Black passed pawns> - Khalifman in vol. 2 of his Anand series.

Apr-04-12  pawnofdeath: spectacular game by kasparov...what calculation, just brilliant!
Sep-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: I believe this was the 1st time that Shirov played the Open variation; sort of a strange choice as Kasparov had prepared this line for the Anand match and could be expected to have improvements ready. played at Linares 2001; Kasparov won this 6 player double round robin with +5 a full 3 points ahead of the other 5 players who tied for 2nd-6th with -1. In this highly theoretical line it is considered necessary for Black to sacrifice a piece with 15..Qd5 because 15..dxc 16 bxc..cxd 17 Qxa6+..Kd7 18 Bxd2 is strong for White. Through 22..axb the game followed Shirov-Timman Wijk aan Zee 1996 where White played 23 Rad1 and went on to win; Kasparov chose 23 Rfd1 which had been played recently in Van den Doel-Timmerman Deizisau 1999. In that game Black played 24..Rd5. In his preparation Shirov had missed that White could respond 25 Rd3 (rather that 25 Ba5 as Van den Doel played) so he played 24..Rhe8 instead with a clear disadvantage. 31..c2 32 R1d2..Bh6 33 f3+ would have led to the loss of the c-pawn.
Oct-12-18  Ironmanth: Holy crap, what a game!! Thanks chessgames. Everyone have a great weekend.
Oct-12-18  palmeiras: Folks: I am over 70 and just now have discovered chess. It's too late for me but at least it keeps my mind occupied. So, pls be patient and help me here. Why did Kasparov sacrifice his knight in move #11?
Oct-12-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: See Karpov vs Korchnoi, 1978
Oct-12-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: <palmeiras: Folks: I am over 70 and just now have discovered chess. It's too late for me but at least it keeps my mind occupied. So, pls be patient and help me here. Why did Kasparov sacrifice his knight in move #11?>

It's not really a sacrifice. After 12.Qf3 the c6 Knight can not be saved.

If you move the horsie than 13.Qxa8, and trying to defend it with 12...Bd7 than 13.Qxf7+ Kd8 14.Nd5 and blacks position is very hard to defend. 12... Kd7 doesn't work either. 13.Bd5 Bxd5 14.Qxd5+ and black is back in a world of pain.

Oct-12-18  cormier:


click for larger view

Analysis by Houdini 4: D 22 DPA DONE

<1. + / - (1.19): 31...Re6> 32.Rxc3 dxc3 33.Rxd8 c2 34.Rd2 Rxc6 35.Rxc2 Kd3 36.Re2 Bc3 37.Nc1+ Kc4 38.Bf8 Bd4 39.Rd2 Bb6 40.Rb2 Ba5 41.Rc2+ Kd5 42.Rxc6 Kxc6 43.Ke2 Kd5 44.Nb3 Bb6 45.Na1 c5 46.Nc2 h5 47.Ne3+ Kc6 48.Kd3 Bc7 49.g3 Ba5 50.Be7 c4+ 51.Kc2

2. +- (1.79): 31...c2 32.R1d2 Re6 33.f3+ gxf3 34.Rxf3 Bh6 35.Re2+ Be3 36.Bxd4 c1Q+ 37.Nxc1 Kxd4 38.Nb3+ Kc4 39.Rexe3 Rxe3 40.Rxe3 Rd6 41.Ke2 Kb4 42.Nc1 Rxc6 43.Kd2 Rd6+ 44.Kc2 Rc6+ 45.Kb2 Rh6 46.h3 Rd6 47.Re4+ Ka5 48.Nb3+ Kb6 49.Re5 Rd3 50.Rg5 c6 51.Nc5 Re3 52.Nd7+ Ka5 53.Nf6 h6

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
October 12: Alexey Sheared Off
from Game of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
Inimigos sob o signo de Karpov
from Partidas de Xadrez by adalav
Kasparov The Killer!!
by Zhbugnoimt
ruy lopez
by tomo6
ervindr's Ruy Lopez
by ervindr
"the kind (of move) you find once in a century"
from Spaniards Settin' Sail by fredthebear
"the kind (of move) you find once in a century"
from GK Collection on the move to Fredthebear's den by fredthebear
Ruy Lopez
by jediknightelijah
Karpov Gambit Accepted
from Spanish Games by Playing Politics
Power Chess - Kasparov
by Anatoly21
puzzling
from gmlisowitz's favorite games by gmlisowitz
s1
from Game collection: B by lolototo
Finest Games of Year 2001
by chessmoron
Kasparov - Shirov
from Ruy Lopez, Open v. 11.Ng5 by Giearth
Kasparov The Killer!!
by chezstartz
Instructional Remedies Vs. Ruy Lopez
by southpawjinx
Risky Defence?
from The Open Defence by Open Defence
Karpov Gambit
from 98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open by webbing1947
Round 8 March 4
from Linares 2001 by Tabanus

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC