Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Fiske / Fuller / Perrin vs Paul Morphy
Consultation game (1857), Hoboken, NJ USA, Dec-06
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Polerio Defense Kieseritsky Variation (C58)  ·  1-0



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 457 more games of Morphy
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: Messrs. Fiske,Fuller and Perrin teach Morphy not to overestimate his attacking chances using the Two Knights Defence.

Morphy had faith in this line as Black using it aginst De Riviere later, but he abandoned the Qh4 idea for a f5 pawn thrust, e.g.

<12.Nc3> f5 13.Be3 Bb4 14.Qd2 Bd7 15.g3 Qe7 agianst De Riviere, London 1859; and

<12.Nd2> f5 13.Nb3 Bd6 14.0-0 Bxh2+ 15.Kxh2 f4 16.Qxe4 Ng5 against De Riviere, Paris 1863.

On this basis instead of <13...Qh4>, an improvement would have been <13...f5> e.g. 14.c5 Bxh2+ 15.Kxh2 Qxd5 16.Rd1

Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <Chessical> 1) Why not 22 ... Bxc2 instead (23. Qxc2 Qxh4)? 2) Why not 44. c6 a6 45. b4 and Black's in zugzwang? Thank you.
Jul-01-04  chessfected: 22...Bxc2 23.g4 Qg5 24. Nf3 Qg6 25. c5 followed by 26. Ne5 with triple attack on f7, not to mention the Bishop on c2. You're right about the Zugzwang. But I guess exchanging rooks does the job as well.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <1) Why not 22 ... Bxc2 instead (23. Qxc2 Qxh4)?> Maybe White would play 23. g4 Qg5 24. Qxf7ch.

Your other suggestion, <2) Why not 44. c6 a6 45. b4 and Black's in zugzwang> looks right. But the line in the game is also an easy win.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Tpstar> The lines given by <Chessfected> and <Beatgiant> are convincing. Morphy's position was sufficiently lost for there to be more than one route to victory.

I believe that Morphy saw that <22 ... Bxc2> was too dangerous, and that the consultants played <44.Rxd8> as a certain win.

Jul-22-06  Rocafella: It takes 3 people to beat Morphy. Shows how good he was ;)
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: When this game appeared in Fiske's <Chess Monthly> of May 1858, p.144, it included the misstep <46.Kd5 Ke7 47.Ke4 Kd8>, so the game ran 51 moves.
Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: From the original annotations:

On Sunday, December 6, Morphy visited Eugene Cook in Hoboken, New Jersey, accompanied by Fredrick Perrin, W. J. A. Fuller and D. W. Fiske. While there, the three visitors played a consultation game against Morphy, which they won. Cook, a brilliant problemist, was an invalid confined to his house most of the time. When the First American Chess Congress was published, the frontispeice was a chess problem composed by Cook and "Dedicated with the Highest Esteem and Admiration to Paul Morphy, the Only." -- Lawson

Lawson's book on Morphy:

Premium Chessgames Member
  fredthebear: Some may find this history of the First American Chess Congress interesting:
Feb-08-22  Z free or die: Did the score (movelist) come from Lawson?

I have a source where there's a repetition of position after 45...a5:

click for larger view

so it goes 46.Kd5 Ke7 47.Ke4 Kd8 and then finishes as above.

(It's in Hazeltine's scrapbooks, but is almost certainly from a London paper)

Feb-08-22  Z free or die: (I had a moment thinking I found a new Morphy game when I first compared the game lengths - a bit over optimistic of me)
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <(I had a moment thinking I found a new Morphy game when I first compared the game lengths - a bit over optimistic of me)>

That happened to me recently, as well, but I have no excuse because the game length search turned up the original. It was the year that tripped me up.

<(It's in Hazeltine's scrapbooks, but is almost certainly from a London paper)>

The game appeared in the <ILN> of June 12th 1858 and <Bell's Life> of November 21st. Staunton crops off <50...axb4 51.axb4>, so yours is likely the latter. The typefaces of the papers are quite distinctive.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Too Many Cooks?
by biglo
morphy plays Black against the fried liver attack team
from Fried Liver Attack by Takchessgiuocopiano
The First American Chess Congress NYork 1857 by Daniel W. Fiske
from Publications by Year and Unconfirmed Source 19 by fredthebear
Paul Morphy: Pride and Sorrow of Chess by David Lawson
from Pins Ins and Outs, ECO C 50s, 60s-90s by fredthebear
3 against paul
from jKING S by jungol
Morphy gets Fried by 3 cooks in Hoboken, NJ
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World Says Fredthebear by demirchess
morphy plays Black against the fried liver attack team
from Fried Liver Attack by Crunch Lucid
April, p. 83 [Game 36 / 3340]
from American Chess Bulletin 1917 by Phony Benoni
morphy plays Black against the fried liver attack team
from Fried Liver Attack by sayatosken
even morphy can be fried
from ATTACKING OPENING!!! by ILoveHammerschlag

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC