chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Richard Reti vs Emanuel Lasker
"Reti or Not, Here I Come!" (game of the day Apr-13-2012)
Clock simul, 3b (1908), Vienna AUH, Dec-19
Italian Game: Scotch Gambit. Anderssen Attack (C56)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 95 times; par: 15 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Reti/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-01-09  Absentee: What a great helpmate game by Reti!
Oct-12-11  Whitehat1963: Reti or not!
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  andrewjsacks: A move is rarely as creative--and amusing!--as White's 11th.
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  andrewjsacks: This game should be better-known.
Apr-13-12  sevenseaman: Seems Reti went on playing his spectacular moves without concern for the OTB situation. Could it be an arranged exhibition game!
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  piltdown man: What a fiasco!
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: White had a lot of tactical possibilities, but he made the worst of his position. What's wrong with 10. Neg5 or 12. Neg5 ?
Apr-13-12  Limpin Kt: Alright, but what pun is this? I didn't get it.
Apr-13-12  mike1: " ready or not, here I come" is used
in "hide & seek" games.
Apr-13-12  solskytz: Great, great pun!!

WTG CG !!

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  scutigera: <Kevin86>: By definition, every sac is sound. Otherwise, it's a blunder, not a sacrifice.
Apr-13-12  solskytz: Not really... a blunder is when you don't pay attention to something elementary. A sac can be unsound but with no obvious, immediate refutation - it's still a sac, just an unsound one.

Just because a computer rates your move -2 point something doesn't mean that you've blundered... Carlsen won such a game from Topalov recently.

Human chess isn't computer chess!!

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <scutigera> On the contrary, every sacrifice is unsound. If it were sound, there would be no sacrifice involved.
Apr-13-12  newzild: ... and then there are Tal-like sacrifices, which may or may not be sound, and nobody really knows.
Apr-13-12  goldenbear: I encountered this opening over-the-board and having never seen it before, I also played 8.Qd8 and won the game. If I remember correctly, my computer analysis after the game showed that 8.Qa5 is correct and that Qd8 is objectively dubious. But it's been so long that I've forgotten what the point of Qa5 was...
Apr-13-12  gofer: <13 Rxe6+> seems to give white a really rather nice position. The obvious reply of <13 ... fxe6 14 Bxb2> leaves black with lots of questions to answer!


click for larger view

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: What a crazy game! Both players make big sacs-but the Champ wins,after all.
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Did Reti even think that Dr. Lasker would fall for 11...♗xb3?? 12 ♘f6# (?)
Apr-13-12  bwarnock: <gofer: (13 Rxe6+) seems to give white a really rather nice position. The obvious reply of (13 ... fxe6 14 Bxb2) leaves Black with lots of questions to answer!>

This is better than the game but it's still probably a fairly easy Black win after 14... Qd5! 15. Q wherever O-O-O getting the king out of danger.

<>

Apr-13-12  bwarnock: <Poohavez: Perhaps, Reti was somewhat optimistic.... Were it not for a huge blunder 13.Nxe6?? Reti would get a well-deserved draw: 13.Bxb2 Bxe1 14.Rxe1 Qd7 15.Bxg7 0-0-0 16.Nxe6 fe 17.Bxh8 Rxh8 18.Rxe6=>

This almost works, however Black can play 14...O-O! when taking on e6 isn't good enough and 15. Qc3 (which appears to win) can be met by 15... Qf6!

Best now seems to be 16. ♕xf6 gxf6 17. ♘e4! ♖fd8 18. ♘xf6+ ♔f8 19. ♘xh7+ ♔e8


click for larger view

and the Black king gets away, so the exchange advantage should eventually win.

Apr-13-12  waustad: The 19 year old Reti was not yet the strong master he became a decade later.
Jul-10-12  Petrosianic: <solskytz>: <Great, great pun!!>

It would be a better pun if he'd pronounced his name that way.

Aug-02-12  LoveThatJoker: Guess-the-Move Final Score:

Reti vs Lasker, 1908.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF LASKER.
Your score: 22 (par = 15)

LTJ

Mar-28-14  ralph46: I played this game today in the guess the move mode. Actually 8 ..Dd8 is a bad move instead of 9 9 Nxe4 in this position Rxe4 is better Be6 10 NXd4 and white has the advantage
Dec-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: From a clock simul at the Wien Chess Club in Vienna, Austria on December 19, 1908.

Lasker scored +2=1-0.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
2- 2n
by classicalwin2
50
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by Edwin Meijer
Game 50 of 100 in 'Why Lasker Matters' by Andrew Soltis
from Nick, Ned & Fredthebear's Sketchy Deal of Week by fredthebear
Scotch Gambit. Anderssen Attack (C56) 0-1Too Wild and Wooly
from Italianz (mostly) 44s by fredthebear
50
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
Chess Traps
by Gottschalk
Opening Tactics
by Easy Point
black wins after 4 0-0 ..wild game black gives up n
from two knights games by Takchessgiuocopiano
50
from Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by StoppedClock
Scotch G. Anderssen Attack (C56) 0-1 White overplays his hand
from Kolty's Single, Double, & TRIPLE KP Attack by A1Rajjpuut
chuter09's favorite games
by chuter09
Emanuel Lasker
from Black wins by Halfpricemidge
evolutionist7890's favorite games
by evolutionist7890

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC