chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Paul Morphy vs John William Schulten
New York (1857), New York, NY USA, Nov-29
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Morphy Attack (C51)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 181 times; par: 25 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Morphy/J Schulten games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-11-02  bishop: You should really try to castle against Morphy. His Rooks go to the open files.
Jan-10-06  morpstau: You got that right Bishop and once you dont castle all hell breaks loose. Once again we see control of center and superior force and development break j.w.s. back!
Sep-19-16  talhal20: Common assumption is that Morpy's opponents were weak and therefore he would crush them. But the way Morphy plays the present grandmasters with their advanced knowledge are no match for him. There is no another Morphy in sight. So for now we have to be satisfied with Magnus Carlsen.
Sep-19-16  Sally Simpson: Yes you must castle v Morphy. And thanks to Morphy (and his opponents who did not castle) for the past 100+ years you must castle against everyone else you will get Morphy'd.

I agree with Bobby Fischer's take on Paul Morphy written in 1964 that Morphy could have held his own and been one of the top players.

Full article here.

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

But that was 1964 and there were not as many good players around then as there are now. Also technique, middle game structures and planning and opening theory has progressed at a rapid rate since then and of course computers.

Although I am a huge Morphy fan I have to admit today he would toil.

His dislike and temperament for closed position would have found him out. Players would not be making the mid 19th century blunders that Morphy taught us how to punish.

And talk of Morphy getting booked up with a month or two and then computer savvy...the 'book' has grown quite a lot since 1964 and branches and side variations are still sprouting. The computer in 1964 was still in it's infancy. Chess wise it a Rooks odss player. Morphy would have liked that.

Regarding computers today, there is an excellent chance Morphy would never have seen a working light bulb (it was patented by Edison in 1879, 5 years before Paul died. New Orleans was 'electrified' on small scale two years after Paul died.) So what would he make of a computer.

First of all he would be flabbergasted by the 6 million+ games in the average data base and then the number of games (particularly games under 25 moves where the winner played like him...nicked his ideas.)

Chess needed him and it is enough that his genius has rubbed off onto generations of later players.

Leave him in the past. It is where legends belong, in the past

Jun-24-18  DrGridlock: Interesting take by Fischer on Morphy. Fisher's observation that he is, "continually surprised and entertained by his ingenuity" is a significant endorsement.

However when Fisher writes that, "there has been no significant improvement since then [1838] in King pawn openings" his hyperbole is too much to take.

Oct-10-20  talhal20: It is said that Morphy was far ahead of his time. Can say this about Carlsen?
Oct-10-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Yes, Magnus is far ahead of Morphy's time. Next question - and make it harder.
Mar-10-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jambow: <talhal20: It is said that Morphy was far ahead of his time. Can say this about Carlsen? Oct-10-20>

<Yes, Magnus is far ahead of Morphy's time. Next question - and make it harder.>

Magnus is ahead of his contemporaries but nothing in comparison to the vast chasm that separated Morphy and his foes in that day. Morhpy towered over his adversaries Magnus is only a smidge above his.

The game has advanced, the opposition is much better, the means of preparation and raw population from which to draw from is exceedingly greater in this day. The task of towing over the chess world is much more monumental today. Magnus is the greatest player of his era and arguably all eras, Morphy so utterly dominated his that only admiration for both of their skills is a proper response.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Evans Gambit. Morphy Attack (C51) 1-0 It's best to castle
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World Says Fredthebear by demirchess
Evans Gambit. Morphy Attack (C51) 1-0 It's best to castle
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World Says Fredthebear by fredthebear
open g file
from frank124c's favorite games--morphy's strategems by frank124c
george
from Portugese Opening by georgedai
Evans Gambit. Morphy Attack (C51) 1-0 It's best to castle
from Captain's Crunch Munched by Fredthebear by fredthebear
POPPYLIL's favorite games
by POPPYLIL
White - Evan's Gambit: Morphy
by gaborn
olof's VERY BEST
by wwm
Nov 29 - Lawson BCM Aug 1978, page 357
from Short games by masters by Southernrun
Nov 29 - Lawson BCM Aug 1978, page 357
from Short games by masters by rbaglini
Paul Morphy -The Great Chess Genius
by Beatlesrob
morpstau's favorite games
by morpstau
MetallateM's favorite games - Evan's Gambit Whit
by MetallateM
Morphy Favorites
by chocobonbon
Nov 29 - Lawson BCM Aug 1978, page 357
from 1 Morphy vs Schulten 1857 - A casual match by Calli
Paul Morphy -The Great Chess Genius
by Timothy Glenn Forney

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC