Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Bronstein vs Deep Blue (Computer)
"Bron vs Brains" (game of the day Aug-21-2009)
? (1996), Apr-18
Sicilian Defense: Wing Gambit. Marshall Variation (B20)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Bronstein/Deep Blue game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-21-09  YoungEd: Too bad Bronstein was such a good guy. Otherwise this game could be: "The Devil and the Deep Blue, see!"
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: One must give credit to IBM, to have such a computer at such an early age of 'artificial intelligence'...

Either that, or David was drunk off his azz on vodka.

Aug-21-09  Aniara: This pun has to be one of the best ever.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: Bronstein doesn't try to beat the robot but rather plays not to lose. This time he succeeds, but no matter... In time, robots will crush all humans.
Aug-21-09  mohitm: This game was already totally overboard and brainstorming(Ra3!?!?!? and the mess that follows...). And i think if it would have Bronstein of old, younger and wackier, he would have ripped DB to shreds.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessmensch: <YoungEd> I trust you are aware that "devil" doesn't mean what you imply it means in that expression. For folks unaware, devil in that sense has this meaning: According to the "International Maritime Dictionary" by René de Kerchove, the devil is 1. The seam in a wooden deck which bounds the waterway. It is so-called from its difficulty of access in calking. 2. A seam in the planking of a wooden ship on or below the waterline.

Thus, between the devil and the deep blue sea (i.e., between a rock and a hard place).

Aug-21-09  lzromeu: Another pun: Deep Bron vs Deep Blue
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessmensch: Acknowledging the level of the players, the moves through 10 remind me of the games we used to play as kids at summer camp.
Aug-21-09  chessenthus: WhiteRook48: 2 b4 was a dumb gambit

Mr Whiterook48, b4 is not at all a dumb gambit.i urge u to plz see some games featuring 2.b4.even i have played it and won also with it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <newzild: This is a mind-boggling game. I can't believe that Bronstein even managed to draw this. I'd never play like this against a computer, saccing bits all over the place and leaving other bits en-prise everywhere.> <WhiteRook48: 2 b4 was a dumb gambit.> Actually, Bronstein's decision to play the Wing Gambit was not a dumb decision. Sometimes when u sac pawns &/or pieces against a computer it impedes the computer's sense of evaluating the position. This is a case in point of this. Deep Blue made an incorrect numerical evaluation after the sacs. Also, Bronstein's moves were designed to keep Deep Blue's ♔ in the center after 7.♖a3!?; he succeeded in doing that. Shredder 11 didn't give Bronstein's move as an option. It gave 4 moves as options.: 7.c3, Na3?, Bb2 & Ba3. Deep Blue won the rematch against Kasparov in '97 (3.5-2.5) so what's so bad about getting a draw against it? Although, Kasparov probably would have drawn the rematch against it if he wouldn't have blundered in the 4th game while playing the black side of a Caro-Kann; consequently, he lost the match because of it. Since some people think that Bronstein's decision to play the Wing Gambit was a bad 1, I decided to have Shredder 11 (latest version of it) play out this game starting @ Bronstein's exchange sac on move 7. White won in 57 moves! Here is the game & the numerical evaluations, albeit they are incorrect. I'm willing to bet that this is why Bronstein decided to play it. He figured that the computer would evaluate the position incorrectly. This game w/ Shredder shows that even a modern chess engine can (& did) evaluate the position incorrectly. It would be interesting to see Rybka 3's treatment against 7.♖a3!?. Verdict of 7.♖a3!?.: It wins against some chess engines/computers, but not against others. [Event "Shootout (Shredder11, 20'/40+60'/20+30'"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"]
[White "New game"]
[Black "Shredder 11"]
[Result "1-0"]
[PlyCount "113"]

1. e4 c5 2. b4 cxb4 3. a3 d5 4. exd5 Qxd5 5. Nf3 e5 6. axb4 Bxb4 7. Ra3 Bxa3 -1.76/14 19 8. Bxa3 -1.76/16 31 Nc6 -1.76/16 34 9. Nc3 -1.75/16 50 Qa5 -1.75/16 29 10. Qc1 -1.75/15 68 Nge7 -1.63/16 53 11. Bb5 -1.87/15 67 f6 -1.87/15 29 12. Ne4 -1.87/14 64 Bg4 (a6) -1.72/15 55 13. Nd6+ -1.72/15 28 Kf8 -1.69/16 102 14. Qb2 -1.69/16 25 Bxf3 -1.64/16 51 15. gxf3 -1.64/17 29 Rd8 -1.64/17 56 16. Bxc6 -1.64/16 30 bxc6 -1.64/17 57 17. Qb3 -1.64/18 31 Qd5 -1.64/18 55 18. Qxd5 -1.64/18 62 Nxd5 -1.53/20 25 19. Nb7+ -1.89/16 24 Kf7 -1.91/17 49 20. Nxd8+ -1.78/19 32 Rxd8 -1.78/19 51 21. d3 -1.86/19 53 c5 -1.86/19 23 22. Kd2 -1.86/18 58 c4 -1.89/18 33 23. dxc4 -1.89/18 28 Nf4+ -1.89/17 48 24. Kc3 -1.89/16 69 Ne2+ -1.70/16 44 25. Kb4 -1.80/17 12 Nd4 -1.80/17 22 26. c3 -1.80/16 52 Nxf3 -1.79/17 23 27. Kb5 (c5) -1.67/16 65 a6+ -1.67/16 31 28. Ka5 -1.44/17 18 Nd2 -1.44/17 33 29. c5 -1.31/17 37 Rc8 (Nc4+) -1.43/17 21 30. Kb6 -1.43/17 56 Rb8+ -0.83/16 23 31. Kc7 -0.68/18 10 Rb5 -0.68/18 39 32. Ra1 -0.68/17 44 Nc4 (Nb3) -0.30/16 55 33. Bb4 -0.07/18 14 a5 0.00/19 18 34. Kc6 0.00/19 32 Rb8 0.00/18 27 35. Bxa5 0.00/17 28 Nxa5+ 0.35/15 29 36. Rxa5 0.35/18 2 Ke6 0.53/18 25 37. Ra6 0.53/18 37 Rb3 1.30/15 18 38. Kc7+ 1.78/16 5 Ke7 1.78/16 18 39. c6 2.19/16 12 Rxc3 2.19/16 1 40. Kc8 2.32/17 3 Rc2 2.32/16 1 41. Ra7+ 2.57/20 125 Kd6 (Ke6) 2.67/24 215 42. c7 2.67/24 253 Rxf2 2.67/23 323 43. Ra6+ 2.85/23 325 Ke7 2.85/24 221 44. Kb7 2.85/24 307 Rc2 (Rb2+) 2.85/24 75 45. Rc6 3.07/24 166 Rb2+ 3.07/25 200 46. Ka6 3.10/26 141 Ra2+ 3.10/26 144 47. Kb5 3.10/26 288 Ra8 3.30/24 157 48. c8=Q 3.30/26 96 Rxc8 3.38/24 325 49. Rxc8 3.38/23 287 f5 (Ke6) 4.03/23 573 50. Kc5 4.02/23 119 Kf6 (Ke6) 3.96/23 251 51. h4 4.71/23 298 g6 5.46/23 319 52. Rc6+ 5.89/22 102 Ke7 6.04/25 225 53. Ra6 6.13/25 223 e4 6.38/23 115 54. Kd4 6.38/24 128 Kd7 6.38/24 66 55. Ke5 6.42/24 116 e3 6.42/24 46 56. Ra3 6.63/24 152 e2 6.63/26 35 57. Re3 6.63/25 165 1-0

Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <chessenthus: <WhiteRook48: 2 b4 was a dumb gambit>

Mr Whiterook48, b4 is not at all a dumb gambit.i urge u to plz see some games featuring 2.b4.even i have played it and won also with it.> I agree completely. Apparently, he's not familiar w/ the fact that sacs sometimes impede the ability of a computer to correctly evaluate the position. Also, this gambit can lead to complex positions & makes it easy for black (or white) to miscalculate something sometimes. The Wing Gambit can be double-edged sometimes, but it's definitely not a dumb decision to play it if u are familiar w/ it. Also, it's great for otb play because chances are that your opponent won't be familiar w/ it, & he/she will only have so much time on his/her clock to use. Btw, in my previous comment I commented that "Shredder 11 didn't give Bronstein's move as an option. It gave 4 moves as options.: 7.c3, Na3?, Bb2 & Ba3". I'm referring to its opening book. Also, the pun for this game is great.

Aug-21-09  AnalyzeThis: <What is 7. Ra3???>

Bronstein know that the bishop was going to be more important than the rook for the next 20 moves. Of course, if the computer were to survive this period, Bronstein loses.

Aug-21-09  MaxxLange: Paul Keres played the Wing Gambit sometimes. Don't underestimate it too much! White gets compensation for the pawn: the d4 push in the center, the QB can come to b2 or a3, the QR can come to b1
Aug-21-09  YoungEd: Hello, <Chessmensch>: Your trust in my knowledge of things maritime comes wholly unwarranted, as I suspect you suspected! Thanks for the info, though; that's interesting. I only knew the phrase from a song title, which needless to say had little of a nautical theme to it otherwise. Take care, YoungEd
Aug-21-09  WhiteRook48: what is wrong with 10...exf3?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: There is analysis of 10...exf3 earlier in the kibitzing; starting here: Bronstein vs Deep Blue, 1996

The conclusion seems to be that Bronstein would have compensation for the material, with several pieces storming Black's undeveloped and uncastled position.

Aug-22-09  zdigyigy: <thick Russian accent> "is draw"
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The games looks like a joke-David vs Mr.Chip
Aug-22-09  anjyplayer: Brons displays sheer confidence and its a virtual win for him playing such a risky line against a computer.
Oct-02-09  giusti825: If bronstien would've moved the knight from F3 to E5 in his 14th move, he would've checked Deep Blue's king and taken his queen for the price of a knight.
Oct-02-09  vulcan20: <If bronstien would've moved the knight from F3 to E5 in his 14th move, he would've checked Deep Blue's king and taken his queen for the price of a knight.>

14. Ne5+ is met by 14...Qxe5

Premium Chessgames Member
  Mendrys: We should all be grateful to the late David Bronstein for his willingness and interest to play against computers. He was willing to experiment and explore their weaknesses and strengths. This would at times lead to a defeat but he wasn't afraid to lose against a computer.
Feb-25-13  Conrad93: Not bad for a 72 year old man.
I doubt the machine would have won against Bronstein in his prime (1940-1950).
Feb-16-14  celtrusco: Goliath was spared this time.
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: Position after 18... Rad8

click for larger view

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Wing Gambit
by azaris
good tactic
by hartkoka
Bronstein fights machine with Wing Gambit and exchange sac
from Comp Chomps, Chumps & Challenges CageFredthebear by fredthebear
Man Vs. Machine
1996 "Bron vs Brains" (GOTD Aug-21-09)
from 2017-2013, World Chess Championship 2016 by wanabe2000
Deeper Blue Sea
from Exciting, Original, Unusual And Other Draws by TheAlchemist
Black has all kinds of checks waiting, so DB takes a perpetual
from KP ef3g45 Holder overs by fredthebear
A game with Bron, and Deep Blue is ready for a rematch with GK
from Man vs. Machine: A chronology by SkySports
(game of the day Aug-21-09)
from WingGambit by lord1412
Bronstein fights machine with Wing Gambit
from Diocletian's favorite games by Diocletian
Bronstein doesn't show interest in rational balance.
from bitko's collection by Jaredfchess
Challenger Bronstein
by Gottschalk
Complex games
by JoseTigranTalFischer
from iranders' favorite games by iranders
Complex games
by TheDestruktor
rochade18's favorite games
by rochade18
La Magia del Ajedrez
by 50movesaheadofyou
kibitz games
by eigis

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC