Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Paul Morphy vs NN
"The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier" (game of the day Apr-12-2010)
? (1850) (unorthodox)
Chess variants (000)  ·  1-0



find similar games 34 more Morphy/NN games
sac: 6.Nxf7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-15-13  fkahlo: <jnpope>
Sorry i just came to this page. Game is from some book my grandfather showd me. There it clearly says Morphy is white. But this is maybe a mistake because there i a lot of speculation, mainly about who was Morphys (if he is white i now understand) opponent. I cant remember who the author was. I wil go to my grandfather library and i will cite a source in the next post
Oct-15-13  thomastonk: <jnpope> Yes, Lawson's original source would be very helpful.

Jay Whitehead's database contains this game here, and this means that he had a contemporary source. Or did I misunderstand the way he worked?

On Lawson's article in BCM 1978. The "Quarterly for Chess History", vol 5, reprintet the games. But there is also an article about games wrongly attributed to Morphy (denoted as plagiarism). Two of the such games in Lawson's collection were identified by Jay Whitehead by providing the original sources. A few others are noted to be suspicious, but not this one.

Oct-15-13  fkahlo: <keypusher>
Maybe i exaggerated a little. Sorry
9...f6 is also a verry bad move. As i remember Fritz prefers 9...d5 or 9...f5

As for 10...Qxe4 i dont know. I have a position in my head so say 10...Qd8 then white has 11.e5 and if say 11...Nc6 12.exf6 gxf6 13.Qe2+ Nce7 14.Ne5 h5 15.Ng6 Rh7 16.Rxf6 and i think its mate next move.

11...c6? you are right about that one. Better is probably 11...Qg6

As for 12.Nc7+ you are probably right but i think point was play for a mate not a material.

I will check it with Fritz when time lets me and get back to you.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <thomastonk>

When I did my data-entry for Jay it was mostly from photocopies of material related to the German Pleiades he had gathered from periodicals he searched through in the White Collection. Sadly Jay didn't document the sources of the photocopied pages at all and typically I only had a page number from the photocopy as a reference point for my database entry (occasionally I would have the published periodical title across the top of a page). He had not gotten into the Morphy era with the material he had sent me. I have no idea what sources Jay used after the Pleiades era or if he started to document his sources.

All I can attest to is he definitely used periodical source materials for the Pleiades games.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: Going through the Whitehead database and comparing those games to games found in Walker's Chess Studies it appears he has them listed sequentially.

Based on the large number of Staunton games before and after that number I'm guessing the source is the Illustrated London News circa 1852. Not much to go on, but it gives me a starting point for a search.

Oct-16-13  thomastonk: <jnpope> I followed a similar or the same idea.

The key of this game in JH's database is 09559. First I took the keys 0955X: two games Kennedy vs Staunton and seven games Medley vs Staunton, all played in 1849; then I took the next ten keys 0956X: there are again many Staunton games, but all played abroad in 1852, and there are two games of Anderssen: Anderssen vs Craske, London 1851 and Lange vs Anderssen, Berlin 1852. Since the games are distributed over so many years, I assumed that another relation brought them together. All games are at odds, partly at heavy odds. However, Staunton's Companion was already published in 1849, and Wray's books are on pawn and move and pawn and two moves, respectively.

Special searches for the other games yielded no surprises, too: many of the 1852 games are in the CPC, and hence I checked the neighboring volumes, as well as "The Chess Player" and "The British Chess Review". But the hope to be successful there was in any case small, because, if the game would have been published there, it would not have been in Lawson's collection.

In "QCH" vol 6, the discussion on the Morphy games of Lawson article continued, but nothing on this one.

Oct-16-13  fkahlo: <jnpope>
Ok i menage to get some information. Author is Moritz Porges.

Im not sure about title because it is in Czech but as my grandfather told me its something like "Less known games of Paul Morphy" (he knows Czech but not perfectly)

Year of publication is 1900

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: I can't seem to find any listing for a Morphy book from 1900 through the Cleveland Public Library website.

Can you post the title in Czech?

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: re: Whitehead database sources

09559 is our target game

Illustrated London News:
1853.01.01: Whitehead games 10503 and 10504
1855.01.06: Whitehead game 09585
1856.01.05: Whitehead game 09623
1857.01.03: Whitehead games 09641 and 09642

Looks like 1852 or 1854 are the best bets. I don't have an online source for the Illustrated London News 1852 or 1854, so I'll have to make a trip to the library in the future (unless someone has a source and finds it first).

But I feel strongly it will turn up in the Illustrated London News.

Oct-16-13  fkahlo: <jnpope>

Mene znamy partie z Paul Morphy

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: Is that a google translation of "Less known games of Paul Morphy" or is that the actual title printed on the book?

I'm looking for the actual title to see if I can locate a copy.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: No Morphy listing for Porges at the Library of Congress, Cleveland Public Library, or in Lawson's bibliography.

Also no record at the National Library of the Czech Republic:

And a general internet search turns up nothing.

<fkahlo> Can you acquire a copy of this book?

Oct-17-13  redwhitechess: how about this game, Morphy vs NN also a rook odd but the writer said the notation got error or something:

Oct-17-13  fkahlo: <jnpope>
This is an actual title. I had a book in my hands yesterday in a library at a university where my grandfather worked. But if you are thinking of me getting it out of there forget it. He does not let even me to borrow this book :)

Ia it possible that something is published and that there is no record of this? Im asking out of ignorance here

Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <<fkahlo> Ia it possible that something is published and that there is no record of this? Im asking out of ignorance here>

Very possible especially if it had a very small limited print run and was distributed locally to that region.

Would it be possible to get a photocopy or photograph of the cover of the book? I'd like to circulate it around to a few other historians (Tomasz Lissowski, Anders Thulin and Joost van Winsen) and see what they know or if they can find me a copy for sale.

Oct-17-13  waustad: It's ironic that the only thing the extra rook did for NN is prevent the king from having an escape square.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <redwhitechess> That game is here: Morphy vs NN, 1857 but Morphy didn't play it. It's really Steinitz vs Rock, 1863
Oct-17-13  TheFocus: Not to be confused with <Steinitz vs RockPaperScissors>.
Oct-18-13  redwhitechess: thanks for info <Calli>.. interesting because the article from The Cambrian was dated 1891...
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: <redwhitechess>: That game was given in Brentano's Chess Monthly, 1882.01, p465-466, as part of the 60 or so Morphy games found by Reichhelm.

The New York Daily Graphic published it in 1885.10.04 as Steinitz-Amateur with the following heading: "A brilliant game at odds of QR. The following remarkable game, which has been erroneously ascribed to Paul Morphy, was played by Mr. Steinitz and a well known London amateur, and appeared in the London Era on June 14, 1863.

Jay Whitehead found it twice, once as a Morphy game and once as a Steinitz game: Game 02819 as Morphy-NN
Game 02845 as Steinitz-Rock

I recall reading an article where Reichhelm defended himself against plagiarism charges by Steinitz over a game and Reichhelm claimed that Morphy had played it before Steinitz (I'm trying to find that article now).

And the column you linked to mentions the game as being played four times by Reichhelm, Morphy, Steinitz and Paul's uncle.

Oct-18-13  TheFocus: I think i may have played it once myself, but those years are still kinda hazy. College days you know.
Premium Chessgames Member
  jnpope: Morphy vs NN, 1857

Looks like that game was wrongly assigned to Paul Morphy by Eugene Cook when he was sending Morphy games to Reichhlem.

I've published some bits from the International Chess Magazine when Steinitz himself was investigating that very "coincidence game."

Jan-28-16  juanhernandez: A jewel never to be lost.
Is the magic
Feb-09-18  kishore4u: Morphy
Sep-24-18  romancitog: My mouth is hanging open.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Strength of the cross-pin: the Sword of Damocles takes aim!
from Spearheads (Batteries w/a Q) Prod Fredthebear by fredthebear
"The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier" (game of the day Apr-12-2010)
from PAUL MORPHY by vaskolon
Paul Morphy's Best Games
by KingG
Morphy's Best Games
by atrifix
ffbc's favorite games
by ffbc
Morphy shows his superiority at the chess board with this game.
from Extraordinary Sacrifices by nesnej2
Game collection: 8
by gr2ca1
Fried liver king backed to B8
from Morphy games by Bishknight
Sacrifices at f7
by artiam
Mate with ONE Bishop!!!
from Stunners by xajik
fried liver attack game UMMM Good
by sayatosken
Fried Liver Attack
from Beginners's Repertoire by Jersey Joe
Best under 20 move mates
by PTenzel
Morphy vs NN, 1850
from Tricky Games by AugustoTM
Ernesto7's favorite games
by Ernesto7
Paul Morphy's Best Games
by jpetersen46321
Opening Tactics
by Easy Point
Morphy with a fantastic game (Even though he gives black a rook
from Paul Morphy Conquered the World Says Fredthebear by demirchess
maheshml's favorite games
by maheshml
Obds (Part 1)
by Penguincw
plus 117 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC