chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Loek van Wely vs Alexander Grischuk
Corus Group A (2002), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 4, Jan-16
Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation (D34)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 8 more Van Wely/Grischuk games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-31-03  PinkPanther: 16.h3? Are hallucinogens legal at Wijk aan Zee? And Van Wely was rated nearly 2700 at the time? Hahahahahaha
Jan-01-04  Brian Watson: Did Van Wely overlook 16..Bxh3, or did he provoke it? 16.h3 exchanges off the annoying bishop at g4 (thereby meeting the threat of 16..d3), and white may have felt he had compensation for the pawn.

The alternative is 16.Nf4 d3 17.Nxd3 Bxe2 18.Rxe2 Qxd3 19.Rxe8 Rxe8. Now who is better? If 20.Bxc6 bxc6 21.Rxc6 Bb4 and black is having more fun . . . ?

Anyway, whether 16.h3 was a good or bad move, I doubt it was an oversight.

Dec-21-04  samvega: doesn't look like 16.Nf4 d3 goes anywhere. but if 16.Nf4 Ne5, then either 17.Nb3 Bb4 or 17.Qb3 Qa5 are uncomfortable for white. i agree 16.h3 was a way to exchange off the bishop at g4, at the cost of a pawn he no doubt believed he could recover.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round Four, Game #28
from Wijk aan Zee Corus 2002 by suenteus po 147
Corus Group A 2002
by Tabanus
16. ...Bxh3! wins a Pawn as Bishop can't move; wins game later.
from Deflection/Undermining Tactics-- OTB Examples by ChessCoachClark

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC