Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Emanuel Lasker
Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921), Havana CUB, rd 1, Mar-15
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Capablanca Variation (D63)  ·  1/2-1/2



Annotations by Jose Raul Capablanca.      [26 more games annotated by Capablanca]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Capablanca/Lasker games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-01-11  Rook e2: Maybe 42 Kc5 Rd3 43 Rf2 g4 44 Kb6
I haven't checked with a computer yet but it might win
Apr-08-11  bronkenstein: Ty for link , slowlylearner :) nice vid.
May-24-11  madlydeeply: AH c'mon now! No more of this "Capa was a natural player"! He clearly analyzed this opening at home, no? I say all his comments up to move sixteen were a result of opening prep. I think he would say he "didn't prepare" as a way to psych out his opponents. His Capa cult of personality.
Premium Chessgames Member
  sillybilly47: I know how it ends but not a bad start for the good doctor.
Oct-31-12  Conrad93: Lasker had a chance for a better game with either 19...c4! or 19...d4!
Dec-19-12  Conrad93: Capablanca's comments are so biased.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
What's the follow-up after 19...c4 20. Qc3? Looks to me like this helps White more than Black.

This actually does look pretty interesting. Capa claims it would have failed, but 19...d4 20. Qa3 Ng4 21. Ng3 Rbc8 looks fine for Black.

Dec-19-12  Conrad93: BeatGiant, the analysis was done by Rybka.

The advantage goes to black after 19...c4.

After 20.Qc3 white's position is cramped.

Dec-19-12  Conrad93:

click for larger view

19...c4! 20.Qc3 Ne4 21.Qa5!Rdc8 22.Nc3 f5
23.Nf3 Rc5 24.Qa3 Qc7 25.Na4 Ra5!

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
Thanks, but I wasn't convinced by a few of White's moves in Rybka's line. Why not simply 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 <21. Qd4>, for example?
Dec-19-12  Conrad93:

click for larger view

21.Qd4 Bc6! 22.b3 Rb4 23.Qb2 Rb8 24.Qc1 Qf6! 25.Nf3 g5!?

click for larger view

I think black is much better off.

Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
I remain unconvinced. On 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 21. Qd4 Bc6, simply <22. Rb1> appears to parry all threats.
Dec-20-12  Conrad93: Apparently not. 22.Rb1 is countered by 22...a5 or 22...Ba4 when black is doing much better. It's a very passive move.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
I don't see why <black is doing much better> in the line you posted. True, Black has the momentary appearance of some piece activity, but I don't see any major follw-up. Meanwhile, the c-pawn and d-pawn are a frozen weakness.
Dec-20-12  Conrad93: Giant, the c and d pawn are very strong.
You are looking at the game like a patzer.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Conrad93>
<c and d pawn are very strong> Could you post something informative about your reasons? Do you say that just because <Rybka> gave Black a plus there?

I'll post a sample line illustrating my belief about the position:

19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 21. Qd4 Bc6 22. Rb1 a5 <23. Nc3> Nxc3 24. Qxc3 Bd7 25. Rd2 Bf5 26. Rbd1

White has visible pressure on the c and d pawns (<27. Qxc4> is a threat).

Dec-21-12  Conrad93: Your line is faulty.

I'll analyze later. Too tired for now.

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Capablanca: "<19...Ne4. All the attacks beginning either with Ng4 or d4 would have failed.>" He could be right! It's a pity he didn't give a few moves of analysis.
Mar-10-15  Marmot PFL: <Capablanca writes, "Kc5 was too risky. The way to win was not at all clear and I even thought that with that move Black might win.">

The younger Capablanca would take risks to win and make a name for himself, but by the 1920s he was already becoming risk averse.

Jan-18-17  edmundo51: Why not simply 19...c4 20. Qc3 Ne4 <21. Qd4 Bc6 and fine 22.f3 if 22...Ba4 23.fe4 B:c2 24. N:c2 and white must win.
Dec-06-17  nacional100: I created a lichess study with my own analysis of the game. I'm just an amateur trying to improve, and haven't used CPU analysis. Please be welcome to take a look and provide comments or feedback.

Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: <Conrad93> Really you shouldn't use "biased" in relation to Capa's comments. You can say that he had a very high opinion of his own ability, you can say that sometimes he made analytic mistakes, but you shouldn't use that word. Capa was as objective as he could be as far as chess positions and moves are concerned. In general I learn a lot from this comments, but, for a player of his strength, he made too many mistakes in his notes.
Dec-06-17  RookFile: Lasker played a nice game here. His chess had a dynamic quality to it. I'm sure the computer finds improvements for both sides. It always does.

Capa presented numerous losses of his in Chess Fundamentals. That's more objective than most people get.

Mar-23-19  Oldturtle: If 26. dxg5, the best for black is 26...BxR 27. cxQ RXR 28. Qxa6.
Mar-23-19  Oldturtle: If 26. dxc5, the best for black is 26...BxR 27. cxQ RXR 28. Qxa6.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Kale Oyunsonlari
by tristanfermat
R+4ps vs R+4ps
by Pawsome
from Match Lasker-Capablanca by Nobis
+4 -0 =10 vs. Lasker (World Match, Havana)
from Match Capablanca! by amadeus
Nietzowitsch's favorite games no 2
by Nietzowitsch
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129
--> R
from 95a_QR endgames --> Heavy pieces in action by whiteshark
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
Capablanca vs Lasker WCM 1921
by ilcca
Josť Capablanca's Rook Endings
by Knight Pawn
March, p. 47 [Game 46 / 3861; April, p. 66 [Game 66 / 3681]
from American Chess Bulletin 1921 by Phony Benoni
rook ending
from jsteward's favorite games by jlsteward
rook ending queens gambit
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
+0 -4 =10 vs. Capablanca (Havana, 1921)
from Match Lasker! by amadeus
51c Middlegames - Black's Hanging Pawns
by whiteshark
Josť Capablanca's Rook Endings
by Nimzophile
WCC: Lasker-Capablanca 1921
by WCC Editing Project
World Championship analysis
by nacional100

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC