Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jose Raul Capablanca vs Emanuel Lasker
"Capa Don't Preach" (game of the day Mar-25-2018)
Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match (1921), Havana CUB, rd 5, Mar-29
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Main Line (D63)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 54 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

Annotations by Jose Raul Capablanca.      [26 more games annotated by Capablanca]

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Capablanca/Lasker games
sac: 16.Ba6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-25-11  madlydeeply: yeah, Paul Morphy and Adolph Andersson would have NEVER thought of saccing the exchange to save a lost game! good go md! jolly good if i may say so meself
Nov-26-11  AnalyzeThis: This is really an excellent game.
Dec-19-12  Conrad93: Madly, mindless play does not account for skill. Sacrificing material can be a detriment to your game. Please get an education and troll elsewhere.

A normal player would not have taken the knight, because a normal player would assume that the bishop is needed for attacking chances.

Nov-06-13  PMcGuigan: Capablanca has the art of making chess look easy
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: For a similar manoeuvre to Capablanca's 25.Rd1-d4, see 20.Rd1-d4 in Kashdan vs Reshevsky, 1942.
Jun-02-15  Tomlinsky: Naroditsky provides, in my opinion, a far more accurate and objective annotation of this classic than Capa here...

Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: Hard to get, even for Capa and SF7, but 34. Rf5 is indeed the best move. Behind the board Capa showed excellent intuition. In fact his intuition sometimes troubled his skills so that he couldn't find the right continuation afterwards. Most peculiar.
Nov-21-16  chessrookstwo: Give it up for capa the man had the invite for chess
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Seirawan analyzes this game at He completely disagrees with the notion that Capablanca refuted Lasker's opening play, and points out a number of improvements for Lasker that likely would have changed the result of this critical game in the match, the first decisive result after four draws.
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Naroditsky rejects 31...h6, since after 32.h5 Lasker's king would have been "stuck forever." Any strong player is extremely reluctant to defend such a situation. But Seirawan says that neither he nor his engine (which gives White a huge plus) can figure out how to break down Black's fortress!
Dec-20-17  RookFile: Yeah, Lasker's opening play seems terrific. It stands to reason that if one or two screws was tightened up black would do well here. Anything beats playing a stodgy defense typical of the Queen's gambit.
Dec-22-17  lost in space: I have the impression that 16...Bxf3 was a mistake.

I can not see how white has a chance to win after 16...cxd4 taking advantage of the uncastled white king - or in general the lack of development of the white pieces.

click for larger view

In fact my silicon monster sees a huge advantage for Black after 16...cxd4. But after 16...Bxf3 a big advantage white. So the brave 16...Bxf3 was a blunder?!

Dec-22-17  Olavi: <lost in space:>

Normally the variation 17.Rxc8 Rxc8 18. 0-0 is given, with clear advantage (18...Bxa6 19.Qxa6 Rc2 20.Qa4). What does the monster see?

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This is a great game right the way through, except for Lasker's error at the end. It is high tension stuff... One or two slightly wrong moves and the opponent will be on top.
Dec-23-17  lost in space: <<Olavi>: <lost in space:> Normally the variation 17.Rxc8 Rxc8 18. 0-0 is given, with clear advantage (18...Bxa6 19.Qxa6 Rc2 20.Qa4). What does the monster see?>

I made a mistake. When adding the position into the comp I forgot to give white the right to castle. And that explains the advantage for black. Sorry for my mistake.

With the right to castle also my comp agrees that white has significant advantage (+1,22) after 16...cxd4

Dec-23-17  RookFile: It appears black could have played 11.....Nxd5 12. Qxd5 Bb7 13. Bxe7 Qxe7 14. Qg5 Qxg5 15. Nxg5 cxd4 15. exd4 Nf6 with equality. White is nominally a pawn ahead but lags in development. I think a guy like Marshall might have tried this, it seems like his style.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Just occurred to me the point of Capablanca's note to Lasker's 45th move makes sense because the match terms agreed they would play at 15 moves per hour so this would have been Lasker's last move before a time control.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <RookFile: Yeah, Lasker's opening play seems terrific. It stands to reason that if one or two screws was tightened up black would do well here. Anything beats playing a stodgy defense typical of the Queen's gambit.>

The move c6 rather than b6 is considered better but Stockfish here for what it's worth prefers 9. Bb5 ...

Seirawan is very good but he has some prejudices. Lasker didn't play this match in the spirited way he had in the past. He wanted to give away his title then they persuaded him with prize money.

Capablanca probably thought, in the absence of a strong reaction by Lasker that he had refuted this line. It does look a bit dubious though for Black. More solid appears 7. ... c6 which is mostly played nowadays. However that 8. ... c5 is almost losing is probably not true...

Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: It seems that after 9. Qa4 better is Bb7...It seems logical. And after that White seems to not really get much as exchanging the B from c8 off is not really that significant for Black. So, I don't know much about the QP openings, and I have seen similar confidant misapprehensions by modern masters; but I suppose only a super being would know that Capa's game was "correct"...

I see more often that GMs today are less sure of any position unless it is very obviously lost. In so many positions there are counter attacks or tactical-strategical resolutions that seem to cancel out what appear to be "clearly superior" positions.

Premium Chessgames Member
  SpaceRunner: "The play here was extremely difficult. I probably did not find the best system of defense. I can not yet tell which was the best defense here, but it is my believe that with the best play White should win."

Indeed stockfish suggest 21.Kf1! Like Capablanca..

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Excellent - a game between two elites of the chess world is presented as GOTD, instead of some crap by sub-2200 players.

Too bad the pun is based on an obnoxious Madonna song.

Mar-25-18  Sho: Capa don't take no mess
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Game-title is backwards and thus stupid, there's no reference as usual, it doesn't even rhyme, I mean for god's sake, shouldn't there be at least one positive value?

Here, there's none, as usual



Mar-25-18  actinia: <morfishine> I also prefer when you can tell by title who wins the game
Mar-25-18  actinia: even the mommas and the capas would have been better, and that was first off the top of my head
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 89
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by demirchess
xapa end
from LEARNING by gmlisowitz
by saveyougod
QGD Orthodox Defense. Main Line (D63) 1-0 JRC played it safe
from Game collection: GDQ by fredthebear
by chocobonbon
memorable moments from the world chess champs.
by kibitzwc
4 the annotations
from jsteward's favorite games by jsteward
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
10. Qc6
from Openings by tivrfoa
annotated games & lis short brilliancys
by gmlisowitz
queen gambit
by rodrigochaves
sapientdust's favorite games
by sapientdust
14-Capa don't preach
from 2009 pun contest by kevin86
The Orthodox Fianchetto
from Play the Queen's Gambit (Marovic) by Chessdreamr by fredthebear
Game 89
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by nakul1964
Game 89
from Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors Part 1 by MetalPlastic
Annotated Capablanca with vg kibbitizing
from kugely's favorite games by kugely
from Thesaint8x's favorites in my opening repertoire by Thesaint8x
Match Lasker!
by amadeus
Game 89
from Garry Kasparov's On My Great Predecessors (1A) by StoppedClock
plus 103 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC