Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Samuel Reshevsky vs Gideon Stahlberg
Zurich Candidates (1953), Zurich SUI, rd 6, Sep-08
Tarrasch Defense: Swedish Variation, Central Break (D33)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 2 times; par: 54 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Reshevsky/Stahlberg games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-07-05  Shams: in the tournament book Bronstein writes, after 23.Re5! b6:

"The pawn at d6 is loose, and the rook may be attacked four different ways - every one of which would lose material for black. Stahlberg contents himself with the modest 23...b6, defending the knight and allowing the queen to get back to c8. I would not have been able to resist 24.Rxe6, with black's queen and knight so far away from their king, his pawns weak, and the pair of white bishops sweeping the board. Variations would have to be calculated too, naturally, but I don't believe they'd look too bad. I would recommend the reader examine 25.Nb5, as well as 25.Qc2 and 25.Bh3, for himself."

Apr-02-07  Ulhumbrus: According to Reshevsky 11 Qc2 is an innovation which probably ruins Black's game in this variation. One question is what White does if Black develops his KN by 8...Nf6 instead of by 8...Nge7. 8...Nf6 invites the pin 9 Bg5. This suggests that if Black is going to play his KN to f6, Black is advised to develop his KB on e7 instead of on b4.
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 6..c4 is referred to as the Swedish Variation. The Swedish team members Stahlberg and Stoltz had introduced the variation in the 1933 Olympiad. One of the ideas behind 11 Qc2 is that 11..Bg4 (with the idea of ..Bxf3 and ..Nxd4) can be answered by 12 Neg5. <This suggests that if Black is going to play his KN to f6, Black is advised to develop his KB on e7 instead of on b4.> The idea of developing the bishop to b4 is to make the e4 break more difficult for white but given how effortlessly Reshevsky achieves it in this game perhaps your idea is worth looking into. I also wonder if 10..Nd5 might be playable. Reshevsky recommended 12..Bf5 13 Nh4..Nxd4 14 Bxd4..Qxd4 15 Nxf5..Nxf5 16 Rfd1..Qb6 17 Qxc4..Rac8 18 Qd5 and concluded that white would have good prospects because of the awkward position of black's minor pieces. Reshevsky's better placed pieces and black's pawn weaknesses gave him the better endgame. He pointed out, however, that 30 Rxd8..Rxd8 31 Bb6..Nc6 32 Bxc6..Rd6 33 Nd5..Be6 34 Ne7+..Kf8 doesn't quite work. 32..Bf5?! gave away a decisive pawn. Reshevsky said that white should still win after 32..Nb3 33 Nxb3..cxb 34 Bd5..Be6 35 Bxe6..fxe 36 Rd6..a5
37 a4!..Rb8 38 Ra6..Rc8 39 Rb6.
Mar-25-12  Ulhumbrus: Reshevsky's comment on 11 Qc2 is < An important innovation that probably ruins Black's defense in this variation. The point is that White allows the capture of the d pawn. If Black takes it, White regains the pawn as follows: 11...Nxd4 12 Nxd4 Qxd4 13 Rd1 Qb6 14 Be3 Qa6 (14...Qc7 15 Bf4 Qb6 16 Qxc4) 15 Nc5 Qb5 16 a4 winning back the pawn with much the better development. The older continuation was 11 a3 Ba5 12 Qa4 Bg4 with approximately equal chances.>
Premium Chessgames Member
  zydeco: I wonder if black can hold on with 32....Re8 maybe followed by .....Nb3.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Supplemental Game 53
from QG Playing the Queen's Gambit by jakaiden by fredthebear
Game 38
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by smarticecream
Zurich 1953
by monkeysbum
Game 38
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by Qindarka
Challenger of 48 Reshevsky_125
by Gottschalk
Round Six, Game 38
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by Atsa
from Veliki majstori saha 23 RESHEVSKY (Marovic) by Chessdreamer
Game 38
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by MSteen
Game 38
from Zurich Candidates Tournament of 1953 (Bronstein) by Baby Hawk
6...c4 7.Bg2 Bb4 8.0-0 Nge7 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 0-0 11.Qc2
from Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch Defence by KingG
Game 10
from How Chess Games are Won (Reshevsky) by Qindarka
Tarrasch Defense
by scrambler
Round Six, Game 38
from WCC Index [Zurich 1953] by suenteus po 147
Game 38
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by isfsam
norcist's favorite games
by norcist
Game 38
from Zurich International Tournament (Bronstein) by cassiooo
6...c4 7.Bg2 Bb4 8.0-0 Nge7 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 0-0 11.Qc2
from 59_Fixit with ..c4! - the Stockholm/Lima Syndrom by whiteshark
Round Six, Game 38
from Zurich 1953 - Bronstein by vantheanh
Supplemental Game 53
from Playing the Queen's Gambit by jakaiden
6...c4 7.Bg2 Bb4 8.0-0 Nge7 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 0-0 11.Qc2
from 98_D34_Tarrasch Defense of QGD by whiteshark
plus 4 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC