chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Nana Alexandria vs Marta Litynska
Candidates (Women) sf2 (1980), Vilnius URS, rd 4, Sep-??
Queen's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation (E12)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 33 more N Alexandria/M Litynska games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-19-13  vinidivici: You can read about this game in SCE1 since the author was the trainer of Nana at that time.

Noted that 41...Rf8 is a sealed move and of course its an obvious move. When they came back on board after the rest day and the envelope uncovered and the arbiter made the sealed move, Litinskaya got surprised how white responded it with 42.Kg1. But thats just a strategy of home analysis with enclosing the element of surprised. Litinskaya thought a long time there and the hard work paid off for white because the result is draw.

Noted that beside 42.Kg1, there are 2 other choices remains...42.Ke1/Rd2.

42.Rd2 line is the weakest since the white rook now at the 2nd rank and we see the ending implicating the opposite-colored bishops and they cannot kill each other so the activity of the rooks are important. Since the white rook in the 2nd rank, it cannot move to the b-file because guarded by black bishop, thats why it is the weakest.

I learnt hours for the position and for me 42.Ke1 is the strongest (contrary with the Nana and the author thought). Since after 42.Ke1, 42...Rxf2 is impossible due to 43.Rxd4+.

Anyway, 42.Ke1/Kg1 are better than 42.Rd2.
Whats the first comes to mind between Ke1 and Kg1 is that the centralization of the king, one submissive to the principle and one disregard it. But the both lines deserves to study. And only an admiration i can present for the white side, since they chose the "little weird" move Kg1 and puzzling her opponent. Perhaps sometimes in the future i will post the calculations i made and its quite complex.

Mar-20-13  vinidivici: And one again:
the Kg1 move can be aligned with this theories:
"If there are no other pieces on the board apart from the opposite-colored bishops and the kings, the weaker side should normally defend PASSIVELY, aiming to set up a fortress"

"On the contrary, when other pieces are present, the main principle is ACTIVITY, a striving for the initiative, EVEN AT THE COST OF MATERIAL. After all, the presence on the board of opposite colored-bishops usually strengthens an attack, since active bishop has no opponent."

source: 1-SCE

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC