chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Cenek Kottnauer vs Alexander Kotov
"Think Like an International Master" (game of the day Sep-30-2010)
Moscow-Prague (1946), Moscow URS, rd 4, May-??
Semi-Slav Defense: Meran. Blumenfeld Variation (D49)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 1 time; par: 31 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more C Kottnauer/Kotov games
sac: 16.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-30-10  Ferro: KOTOV
Sep-30-10  Ferro: KOTOV.
Sep-30-10  rjsolcruz: The great Kotov was not thinking like a grandmaster on this particular game. Maybe, just maybe, he was evaluating this move or that move, but made another move just like that.
Sep-30-10  bvwp: I think it was Harry Golombek who said that, in all due modesty, he had been able to think like a grandmaster. What he'd not been able to do was to win like one.
Sep-30-10  laskerian: That is a great pun. Kotov trained and thought like a GM, but played like an IM.I suspect that while playing this game, Kotov thought of so many options, but played the wrong ones instead.

Kotov was a great player; actually one of the reasons why I loved Bronstein's Zurich 1953 Interzonal (aside from Bronstein's wonderful annotations) is the way Kotov played some of the games there.

Can someone give me the game with the title "The Knights who say Nh1". That, I think is another great pun.

Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White switches the attack from the rank to the file;black has no defense.
Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: The Moscow - Prague match of 1946 was with teams of 6 players, and 12 rounds of play. Moscow won the match by a score of +37 -6 =29 (51 1/2 - 20 1/2).

The top Moscow players: Bronstein +10 -1 =1; Kotov +8 -1 =3; Smyslov +7 -1 =4; Alatortsev +4 =5; & Lilienthal +3 =6.

The top Prague players: Kottnauer +3 -6 =3; & Zita +1 -5 =6.

Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: The position gets complicated after 21...Rg8!?


click for larger view

22 Rfe1 does not look that good now because black has 22...Bf6, pinning the knight and theatening 23...Ne4.

If 22 b4 then 22...Nd7 looks OK for black.

Can't see a clear way forward for white.

Sep-30-10  PivotalAnorak: laskerian: Nimzowitsch vs Rubinstein, 1926
Sep-30-10  belgradegambit: Jimfromprovidence: 22.Bc7 followed by 23 b4 (after Qc6) my slow computer thinks white is somewhat better.
Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: As noted by <Cibator>, Kottnauer on the BBC radio (1962) series, "My Favorite Game", reviewed this game.

Kottnauer stated that the moves up through 19...Kf6 were made very quickly by both players.

At that point, Kottnauer said he realized to his horror that he was not sure how to continue. In addition, he had the uncanny feeling that he had fallen into a prepared variation.

Kottnauer mentioned that he took a little walk at that point, and in passing the captain of the Prague team, he asked him if he knew what White should do at that point. Kottnauer added that he would not be commenting on the morality of discussing the game with a third person.

Kottnauer said the captain suggested giving check with the knight and taking the rook. Kottnauer said he did not take the advice seriously. Fritz agrees with Kottnauer's decision: (-.89) (20 ply) 20.Nh7+ Kf7 21.Nxf8 Kxf8 22.Qg6 Qc7.

Returning to his table, Kottnauer started to do some serious thinking. He said he finally recognized that 20.Qh4 was a theoretically recommended move, and that it could lead to a draw after 20...Rh8 21.Nh7+.

However, Kottnauer said he was not satisfied with a draw as White in an agressive opening, and he was also suspicious of a possible improvement by Black after 20.Qh4. Later, he said, it was confirmed how right his instinct was, as Kotov was prepared to answer 20.Qh4, with a recommendation by Keres, 20...e5!.

Fritz confirms that the Keres/Kotov prepared move was winning for Black: 20.Qh4? e5! (-2.20) (19 ply) 21.f4 e4 22.Nxe4+ Ke6 23.Nxc5+ Qxc5, or (-2.48) (19 ply) 21.Nh7+ Kf7 22.Qh5+ Kg8 23.Nxf8 Bxf8.

For fully 45 minutes, Kottnauer said he evaluated and revaluated the position. Finally, he said he decided to burn his bridges and to throw all his forces in to attack the Black king. With that in mind he played, 20.Bf4! (Fritz at 20 ply, indicates an approximately equal evaluation for both 20.Re1 Rg8, and for 20.Bf4 Ke7).

Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chesssantosh: i have been watching GOTD in cg for more than two years but truth to be told i have never cracked the pun.but today i am very proud of myself that i understood the pun.you know,you have to be familiar with general knowledge may be across the web to understand the pun.as far as today's GOTD is concerned kotov is well known chess writer and to name few his books are 'think like a grandmaster' 'play like a grandmaster' 'how to become a grandmaster' etc.well here he is beaten by a international master so the pun is satire to him either suggesting him to think,first of all,like a international before going into grandmaster or don't think too much like a grandmaster....so now i feel it gives immense pleasure when u crack a pun..hoping to do the same again
Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chesssantosh: at <laskerian> i dont think the pun suggests he played like a international master
Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: Kottnauer said his move 20.Bf4, with the threat of 21.Be5+, caused Kotov to take some time before he played 20...Ke7.

His next move, 21.Rac1, shook Kotov, and caused him to think for some twenty minutes.

Fritz indicates an equal evaluation after 21.Rac1: (.00) (21 ply) 21...Rg8!, (.00) (21 ply) 22.Bc7 Qc6 23.b4 Ne4 24.Nxe4 Qxe4 25.Qg5+, or (.-12) (21 ply) 22.Nh7 Bb7 23.Rxc5 Qxc5 24.Rc1 Qxc1+ 25.Bxc1.

Kottnauer indicated his moves 21.Rac1 & 22.Rfe1 did not have precise meanings, but were based on sound principles, bringing his rooks into the battle, and making it impossible for Black to consolidate his position.

Kottnauer admitted he was still worried about his queen's flank. He remembered how relieved he felt when Kotov did not dare to take his rook pawn (21...Rxa2?). Kottnauer apparently had not spent much time analyzing 21...Rxa2?, as Fritz shows this move would have been a serious error: (2.96) (20 ply) 21...Rxa2? 22.b4 Rg8 23.bxc5 Qd8 24.Bd6+.

As noted in the above analysis, Kotov could have maintained an equal position with 21...Rg8!. However, after 21...Ra7?, he had a losing position. Kottnauer noted that 21...Ra7? was played with the intention of protecting the 7th rank, but he made no comment regarding the much superior 21...Rg8!.

Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: After 21...Ra7? 22.Rfe1! Bd7, Kottnauer said, that with the optimism of the attacker, he could see the final breakthrough, with the move 23.b4!.

However, Kottnauer stated there could have been complications had Kotov played 23...Na4.

Fritz shows, that after 23...Na4, the game was clearly won for White by 24.Nxe6! Bxe6 25.Qxg7+ Rf7 26.Rxe6+! Kxe6 27.Qe5+ Kd7 28.Qd5+ Ke7 29.Rc8

However, Kottnauer was of the opinion that best after 23...Na4 was: 24.Nxe6! Bxe6 25.Qxg7+ Rf7 26.Bg5+ Kd7 27.Qh8 Nc3 28.Rxe6 Qxe6 29.Qxd4+ Kc8 30.Rxc3+ Rac7 31.Rxc7+ Rxc7 32.h4, winning. Kottnauer's 26.Bg5+ wins, but it is not as good as 26.Rxe6+!.

As played, 23.b4! Na6 24.Nxe6 Bxe6 25.Qxg7+ Rf7 26.Bg5+ Kd7 (not 26...Kd6 27.Rxe6+!), and now, as Kottnauer said, comes the quiet, problem-like key move: 27.Qh8!!, and Black has no further defense.

As the game approached its' end, Kotnauer admitted that even while knowing that he had been on the receiving end many times in the past, and would again in the future, he still felt a shameless pleasure in seeing his opponent's ears and neck turning a deep red in shock and recognition of the approaching end.

Kottnauer finalized his comments by saying that it was probable that he most liked this game because it was a good example of power play in chess.

Sep-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Kottnauer was an IM: the game shows us what you can achieve when you 'think like an International Master'. Apart from a sardonic nod to his well-known books, I don't think the pun implies a negative comment on Kotov's play.
Sep-30-10  belgradegambit: FWIW Domdaniel is correct. When I chose this game and title it was because Kottnauer was an International Master and here he was beating an opponent who "thinks like" and is a GM. No disrespect intended to to Kotov, just thought it was an ironic title for the game.
Sep-30-10  rapidcitychess: One of the few puns I really laughed on. Nice game too.
Oct-02-10  gauer: <belgradegambit: ...he was beating an opponent who "thinks like" and is a GM>. Kotov's biography page suggests that in 1946, he was still a young enough contestant for earning his GM title 4 years later (& Kottnauer picked up his IM the same year as the freshly-elected future GM). Luckily, Kotov later got out of that train of thought.
Oct-02-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: < gauer: <belgradegambit: ...he was beating an opponent who "thinks like" and is a GM>. Kotov's biography page suggests that in 1946, he was still a young enough contestant for earning his GM title 4 years later >

Actually, Kotov was already a GM in 1946; he became a GM of USSR in 1939. In 1950, when the new IGM title was created by FIDE, all GMs of USSR automatically converted to IGMs by a FIDE decree.

Feb-24-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: That last move was a mistake. White will win a bishop or rook.
Feb-24-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: <Penguincw: That last move was a mistake. White will win a bishop or rook.> The problem is, that there is no move left which is not a "mistake"! White threatens 28.Qc8+ with disaster. What to do about that?
Oct-25-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  fiercebadger: Kottnauer was once my chess coach, he gave an evening class in Bell st London. I remember he was a little impatient with us patzers . at the end of the class he would play a simul and enjoy smashing us all up
Dec-09-18  railway: <Pawn and Two: Fritz indicates an equal evaluation after 21.Rac1: (.00) (21 ply) 21...Rg8!, (.00) (21 ply) 22.Bc7 Qc6 23.b4 Ne4 24.Nxe4 Qxe4 25.Qg5+> Position after 24...Qxe4


click for larger view

Stockfish 10: 25.Bd6 26.Kf6 (other king's moves lead to force mate) And now 27. Bf4 (with threat Qg5 for mate sequence) 27...Ra7 (protects 7 rank from Rc1-c7) 28.Rfe1 (activation of the Rf1)28... Qa8 (keeps presure on g2) And now 29. Bb8! (disconnects black's pieces coordination of 8 rank and threatening Rxc8)


click for larger view

28...Kf7 (free way for black bishop to go on e5) 29.Bxa7 And now Be5!


click for larger view

If white queen takes bishop, mate on g2.
Stockfish 10: 30.Rc7+ Bxc7 31.Qxc7 Ke8 32. f3 (black queen and black rook attack g2 from distance) 32... Bd7 (prevents 7 rank for Bc5 mate threat) 33. Bxd4


click for larger view

For computer engines, white is winning, but if players are humans, black have chances for counterplay.

Aug-26-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark:


click for larger view

Black to move

1) =0.00 (32 ply) <16...Kxh7 17.Ng5+ Kg6 18.Qg4 f5 19.Qg3> Rg8 20.b4 Qb8 21.Bf4 e5 22.Nh3+ Kf7 23.bxc5 Bf6 24.Ng5+ Bxg5 25.Bxg5 Be6 26.Qh4 Rh8 27.Qg3 e4 28.Bf4 Qg8 29.Bg5 Qb8

2) +6.85 (31 ply) 16...Kh8 17.Ng5 e5 18.Qh5 Bh6 19.b4 Na4 20.Be4 Kg7 21.Bxa8 Qg6 22.Qxg6+ Kxg6 23.Nf3 Bg7 24.Bc6 Bg4 25.Bd2 Nc3 26.Bxc3 dxc3 27.Bxb5 e4 28.Ne1 Rd8 29.Nc2 Be6 30.Bc6 f5 31.Ne3 Kf7 32.Rfd1 Rd2 33.a3 Kg6 34.Rxd2 cxd2 35.Rd1 Bc3 36.Bd5 Bxd5 37.Nxd5

= = =

After <16...Kxh7 17.Ng5+ Kg6 18.Qg4 f5 19.Qg3>


click for larger view

Black to move

1) =0.00 (28 ply) 19...Rg8 20.b4 Qb8 21.Bf4 e5 22.Nh3+ Kf7 23.bxc5 Bf6 24.Ng5+ Bxg5 25.Bxg5 Be6 26.f4 e4 27.Qf2 d3 28.Qd4 Rg6 29.Rfb1 Qh8 30.Qxh8 Rxh8 31.a4 Ra8 32.axb5 Rxa1 33.Rxa1 e3 34.Ra7+ Kf8 35.Ra8+ Kf7 36.Ra7+

2) +0.55 (28 ply) 19...Ra7 20.Bf4 e5 21.Ne6+ Kh7 22.Nxf8+ Bxf8 23.Bxe5 Ne4 24.Qh3+ Qh6 25.Qxh6+ Kxh6 26.Bxd4 Ra6 27.f3 Ng5 28.Rac1 Bd7 29.h4 Ne6 30.Bf2 Bg7 31.Rfd1 Be8 32.Rc8 Bg6 33.Rb8 Bxb2 34.Rxb5 Bf6 35.Rd2 Bc3 36.Re2 Nd4 37.Bxd4

3) +0.55 (28 ply) 19...Ra7 20.Bf4 e5 21.Ne6+ Kh7 22.Nxf8+ Bxf8 23.Bxe5 Ne4 24.Qh3+ Qh6 25.Qxh6+ Kxh6 26.Bxd4 Ra6 27.f3 Ng5 28.Rac1 Bd7 29.h4 Ne6 30.Bf2 Bg7 31.Rfd1 Be8 32.Rc8 Bg6 33.Rb8 Bxb2 34.Rxb5 Bf6 35.Rd2 Bc3 36.Re2 Nd4 37.Bxd4

All 6.0 minute analysis by Stockfish 9 v010218

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Brutal Attacking Chess
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Game 48
from Game of Chess (Golombek) by Qindarka
C6 The Classic Bishop Sacrifice pg 131
from Art of Attack in Chess Vladamir Vukovic & Chess by Atsa
Bishop sac on h7 and fierce attack
from Honza Cervenka's favorite games2 by Honza Cervenka
Game 69
from Master Games - Modern Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Qindarka
16.Bxh7+!!
from 70a_middlegame SACS Bxh7+!! by whiteshark
Wild Meran Attack
from JonathanJ's favorite games 2 by JonathanJ
h7 attack - not obvious
from Arcturus' favorite games by Arcturus
From "The Classic Bishop Sacrifice"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by nakul1964
Standard theme in Semi-Slav I
from White's Kingside Attack in QGD-like openings by samikd
The Art of Attack
by BlueMooner
From "The Classic Bishop Sacrifice"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by Ziiggyy
C6 The Classic Bishop Sacrifice pg 131
from Art of Attack in Chess Vladamir Vukovic & Chess by hought67
Meran Variation
by falso contacto
From "The Classic Bishop Sacrifice"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by Jaredfchess
Think Like an International Master
from marwanredman123's favorite games 2 by marwanredman123
From "The Classic Bishop Sacrifice"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by howardb86
Damegambiet
by Chessdreamer
Brutal Attacking Chess
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Burning the bridges for an attack
from Nova's favorite games by Nova
plus 23 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC