chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

NN vs Esteban Canal
Barcelona (1935)
King Pawn Game: Alapin Opening (C20)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more NN/E Canal games
sac: 8...Bxc2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-26-04  aw1988: Wow, I'm thinking a weakness with c2...
Oct-26-04  aw1988: I give up.
Oct-26-04  aw1988: GAH! Missed smothered mate entirely! I was thinking "after the double recapture on c2"... :(.
Oct-26-04  EyesofBlue: The rare, but always fun... "smother mate."
Oct-26-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It looked like Canal was "in the Zone" in this one! Queen saved but king lost.
Oct-26-04  Saruman: arggh a bit slower today 3 seconds...
Oct-26-04  ChessPraxis: Remember - let your king BREATHE!
Oct-26-04  Calculon: Is Ne2 the losing move or just one in a series of bad moves? It seems to serve no purpose; it costs a tempo to free the King's bishop.
Oct-26-04  Shah Mat: ahh smothered mate puzzles. how i love them!

for a nice little database of smothered mates (with java!) check out this site. http://www.academicchess.com/Games/...

Oct-26-04  beenthere240: People who don't see smothered mate opportunities or threats in their actual games probably aren't looking for and miss them. The famous Fischer D. Byrne "immortal" game incorporates smothered mate threats, for example.
Oct-26-04  azaris: <People who don't see smothered mate opportunities or threats in their actual games probably aren't looking for and miss them.>

To be fair, if the other side can play a smothered mate they're usually winning anyway so missing it isn't that big a deal.

Oct-26-04  dac1990: You really have to start feeling sorry for poor NN.
Oct-26-04  GoodKnight: <Shah Mat>

Thanks for that website - I enjoyed looking through the games.

Oct-26-04  Knight13: Good shot. NN is always busted anyway.
Oct-26-04  Knight13: I think this puzzle is in the book "More Chess Openings: Traps and Zaps 2" by Bruce Pandolfini. I've seen this game or puzzle somewhere.
Oct-26-04  beenthere240: Broke down and looked it up:

Nomen Nescio, abbreviated to N.N., is used to signify an anonymous or non-specific person. The literal translation is "I don't know (his) name".

Oct-26-04  Stonewaller2: <Calculon> I wouldn't be as down on 2. ♘e2, meant to support ♙d4-d5, as I would be on 7. ♗d2?. In the event, 7. ♘g3, preventing ... ♗f5 (though I wonder how many of us would have found Black's 7th instead of his 8th, and/or how fast) and intending ♘fe4, looks better.
Oct-26-04  rover: I've always thought this was a Capablanca combination. Maybe it's the same pattern but a different position?
Oct-26-04  BluE DicE: A very pretty mate. I got this one pretty fast, because it reminded me of some positions I studied when I was learning.

I'll find myself looking for that elusive Smothered Mate, but the oppurtunity rarely occurs in my games.

Jul-30-09  jsheedy: Has NN ever won a game?
Jul-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Game Collection: N N's best games
Aug-31-11  DrMAL: Ole NN tried his hand at Alapin's Opening, after 4...Qa5 it looked like a gnarly version of the Scandinavian. 6.a3 or 7.Ng4 were entirely too unpatzerish instead he decided to go for choke.
Sep-01-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheTamale: I guess 7. Bd2 is the clunker here. I must say, I never would have suspected as much were I playing the White pieces.
Sep-01-11  DrMAL: Well, 8.Rc1 was even more of a clunker (instead of 8.Ne4) but 9.Rxc2 for mate in 1 instead of 9.Qxc2 won the prize.
Jan-24-13  Amarande: <Calculon: Is Ne2 the losing move or just one in a series of bad moves? It seems to serve no purpose; it costs a tempo to free the King's bishop.>

It's generally not regarded as best (2 Nf3 typically is), and is something barely ever to be seen at high levels, but even to refer to 2 Ne2 as unsound, let alone losing, would be to go rather too far. It's hard to get a clearly lost game in two moves, especially with White - you pretty much have to fall into the Fool's Mate or hang a piece in order to do that, even against a strong opponent.

Indeed, this somewhat reserved development of the Knight has some positive features indeed. In the double e-pawn openings, it's often desirable for White to make a delayed advance of d2-d4, and also for White to place a Knight at f5, especially when Black castles short as he normally does. Both the developments to e2 and f3 seem equal in this regard (both are two moves from f5, and both support d4), but the development to e2 has a couple of particular advantages:

* Black cannot as easily disrupt White's plans to play d2-d4 with the pin Bg4, which often sees White in major openings (e.g. the closed Ruy Lopez main line) spending a move to play h3 in order to prevent it. With the Knight on e2, there is much less need for prophylaxis against the pin - for one, BxN will not damage White's Pawn structure if the Queen moves out of the pin as would be the case were the Knight at f3, and for two, there's the additional option of f3, particularly viable if White castles long (which is already frequent in openings where N-K2 is played by either side before developing the KB).

* The approach to f5 from e2 is via g3, which is a much safer square. OTOH, developing the Knight to f3 normally requires that it approach f5 via h4, a normally unsupported square. The difference is manifest when one considers Black's normal development - Nh4 will probably have to be supported by a preparatory move, lest Black win the e4 pawn with Nf6xe4 followed by snapping up the unprotected Knight (either with an unmoved Queen or with a Bishop developed to e7). Thus, the upshot is that White usually ends up after Nf3 having to use the Queen Knight to occupy f5, which takes an additional tempo (it taking four moves to bring the Knight from b1 to f5, versus three when starting at g1).

In addition, the KB may not really be of much use at all depending on White's attacking plan. Realistically, in the majority of double e-pawn games, this Bishop gets its day in the sun, if at all, early in the game and becomes much less relevant after the opening stages. This is easily appreciated by the fact that the focus after Black castles normally shifts from f7 to g7 - a dark square - or h7, for which the natural attacking diagonal for a White Bishop is obstructed by the e4 pawn. As a result, even in openings like the Ruy Lopez where this Bishop is initially developed grandly, one frequently sees it move into inactivity during the middle game (at c2 in the Lopez, for instance, the Bishop's role is largely limited to being an additional reinforcement for e4). So, blocking the Bishop may not turn out to be a significant handicap anyway.

As for the game at hand, the real clunker is indeed 7 Bd2?, after which White cannot avoid significant material loss. The least evil is then 8 Qc1 (not 8 Qb1 Nxc2+ 9 Kd1 Ne3+ catching the Queen after all) Nxc2+ 9 Kd1 Nxa1, after which there is still a game to play, but White has lost the Exchange and the ability to castle and although Black should by no means expect to win quickly, the result is not in doubt.

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
9 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection III by wwall
kings pawn 0-1 kvävmatt
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
8...? (October 26, 2004)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
The power of Smothered Mate & double Attacks!! (8?)
from kingofdallas' favorite games by kingofdallas
1.P-K4 Alapin Opening 7.Ng3 might hold it. (C20) 0-1Smothered #
from Toy Box of Tops, Trumps, Twists and Turns by fredthebear
amazing games of unknown players
by MIFoguelman
8...? (Tuesday, October 26)
from POTD Uncommon by takchess
Game 35
from 1000 Best Short Games of Chess by joekenn
P-K4 Alapin Opening (C20) 0-1 7.Ng3 might hold it.
from C20 Q's Hack & C40 Damiano's Defense Odd P-K4 by fredthebear
Sonia lamba's favorite games
by Sonia lamba
Game 35
from 1000 Best Short Games of Chess by Retarf
Incorrect or Unfortunate
from Imagination (Piece Placement) by Mayoigo2
Checkmate 1930-1939
by Chessdreamer
zengames
by zentovic
9 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection III by PinkLedDoor


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC