Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Mogusar vs Terry Lee Trippe
St. Louis (1984), St. Louis, MO USA
Bird Opening: From Gambit (A02)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games more games of Mogusar
sac: 5...Qxg3+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-13-09  AnalyzeThis: This game was quite a Trip.
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: I don't think this is quite what Henry Bird had in mind.
Jul-13-09  Kasputin: 4 ... Qh5+ then sac the d6 bishop for the pawn that moves to g3 and watch as checkmate happens.

My guess is that the moves were:

1. f4 e5
2. fxe5 d6
3. exd6 Bxd6
4. b3???

Am I allowed a triple question mark?

There is nothing wrong with playing the Bird but how can anyone past beginner stages so sadly neglect king safety?

Okay, I have to see when this game was played, by whom, etc...

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: I played this exact game in an offhand game about 1974. In 1977, I won a tournament game against a 1677-rated player that went 4.Nf3(!) g5 5.h3?? Bg3#. Unfortunately for us From's Gambit fans, Tim Taylor in his book on the Bird's a couple of years ago demonstrated that with precise play by White, 5.g3! is very strong. See A Muzychuk vs V Solovjova, 2009 and J Wuttke vs J M Matisson, 1999. But Black can still play 4...Nf6, leading to truly unfathomable complications.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <backrank> The average kibitzer can understand this game. That's why there are so many comments.

Of course, not understanding the game has never stopped kibitzers in the past...

Jul-13-09  stacase: backrank wrote, "What I find slightly annoying is the fact that there are 3 pages (!) of kibitzing below this nonsense game, while, on the other hand, there are lots of great games between some of the greatest players with no kibitzing at all ..."

My personal rule; if I don't get the first move, I don't post.

Jul-13-09  felixd: Haha that was very very easy. How does someone like Magusar can have some of his games here? Is he something like 600 elo?
Jul-13-09  lzromeu: "The Big Brother"
Jul-13-09  MaczynskiPratten: <Blacksburg, Fouard, etc> Books I have seen in the past - some quite old - have always shown this as From's Gambit (and Bird's Opening). Likewise Alekhine's Defence, Petroff's Defence. So have chessplayers just got grammatically sloppier over the years with things like Benko Gambit?

On the other hand one can think of a lot of ancient gambits with no apostrophe; Kieseritsky, Cunningham, Allgaier, Muzio .... Plus Marshall Counter Attack, etc.

But we don't say King Gambit or Queen Gambit :-)

(end of pedantic dissertation ;-)

Jul-13-09  MaczynskiPratten: <Waitaka> Agree the lack of detail about the players does make this game look a bit suspicious - but from page 1 comments it's been in the DB over 5 years - so it's not a plant by (unless they planned it a very long way in advance!)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Oh, this is cute. M. Trippe must have thought he was hallucinating ... a mate in 3 in the opening, with optional Queen sac.

Is this a Reversed From's Gambit, a Reversed Swiss Gambit, a cross between a Nimzo-Larsen and a Neo-Lisitsyn, or what?

It's curious how Bird's Opening (1.f4) can lead to opening blunders. I've won a few quick tournament games, both with it and against it.

Here, no need to waste a nano-second contesting the long diagonal. Just check on h4, take on g3, and mate.

I'd sac the bishop, to be different...

Jul-13-09  WhiteRook48: this is weird...
4 b3 deserves 81945 question marks
4...Qh4+ 5 g3 Qxg3+!!!! 6 hxg3?? (0-1) Bxg3#
Jul-13-09  Sicilian Dragon: A very tame Monday puzzle...
Jul-13-09  Marmot PFL: this puzzle is for the birds
Jul-13-09  ShouldBeWorking: Just joined Chessgames today, and I'm pleased to announce that so far I have solved every puzzle presented on the site.

And I'm gonna save this post, because tomorrow it will no longer be true . . . .

Jul-13-09  thezimboman: b3 was just a useless move: aiming at g7 hahahaha!!!

I would have preferred 4. Nf3 of course!

Jul-13-09  Chlipchlop: <WhiteRook48 6 hxg3??> An error ? Do you see any improvement ?
Jul-13-09  fyad reject: *thinks a monday puzzle is too easy*

*disparages anyone who couldnt get it*

*is a haughty prick about chess*

Jul-13-09  Sicilian Dragon: <<WhiteRook48 6 hxg3??> An error ? Do you see any improvement ?>

better was to not move at all

Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <AnalyzeThis> <This game was quite a Trip.>

Yep, trip of a lifetime.

Jul-13-09  Checker2: This may be the first Chessgames puzzle where the entire game move history is evident from the position. <Kasputin> was right but there is no other move order or sequence that gets to this position by move 4.
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: I love the From's Gambit & play it some myself. It can be very dangerous for white if he/she is not careful.

<Phony Benoni: <backrank> The average kibitzer can understand this game. That's why there are so many comments.

Of course, not understanding the game has never stopped kibitzers in the past...> :D

Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: What's suspicious? The players were probably two fish who played this one entertaining game that got published somewhere and thereafter made it into CG's database. I've played the From's many times (including this precise game, as mentioned above) and weak players do sometimes play ridiculous moves like 4.b3?? and get mated.
Jul-16-09  whiteshark: Mogusar walked right into a trippe.
Jul-22-09  Archswindler: <OK, I'll start the discussion. You sac the queen. 100%. The bishop sac is for wimps.>

No, no, no. It's not a proper queen sac unless it's the ONLY way to deliver mate. If there is an equally viable alternative to the queen sac, then it loses all its impact, and becomes slightly sad.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Exactly the same as Greenwalt vs B Wall (move-for-move)
from Quickest Games by GoodKnight
Fool's Mate with Queen Sac variant
from Brutal Attacking Chess by JoseTigranTalFischer
From gambit; Q sac mate
from Chess Miniatures, Collection I by wwall
from Mate (Mate-in-Three) by patzer2
No, 4. b3?? isn't the refutation either
from MorphyMatt's world of the weird by MorphyMatt
Fool's Mate with Queen Sac variant
from Brutal Attacking Chess by Timothy Glenn Forney
three moves made-three more to mate
from unique themes :fourth division by kevin86
Black 4?..
from Guess The Move II by Ercan
Game collection: 2
by gr2ca
From Gambit 0-1 6 drag.SI!!
from xfer's favorite games 2009 by xfer
monday puzzle 13.07.2009
by PaulKeres
from Checkmate miniatures by Kasputin
4...? (Monday, July 13)
from Puzzle of the Day 2009 by Phony Benoni
4...? (July 13, 2009)
from Monday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
opening traps
by obrit
other games
by senankit
Bird Opening: From Gambit (A02) 0-1 Qh4+ always lurks
from Walls, Nests and Feathered Friends by fredthebear
Bird Opening: From Gambit (A02) ยท 0-1 Q sac, mate in 6
from yQThee Queen is Mean Vol. I so says Fredthebear by fredthebear

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC