chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Veselin Topalov vs Peter Leko
Dortmund Candidates (2002), Dortmund GER, rd 2, Jul-19
Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan. Sveshnikov Variation (B33)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 2 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 69 more Topalov/Leko games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-14-05  Whitehat1963: Where did Topalov lose this one?
Jul-14-05  aw1988: How about 40. Rd1?
Jul-15-05  Whitehat1963: Why not 40. Bd1 instead?
Jul-15-05  hintza: 40.Bd1 (or Rd1) Nxd1 41.Rxd1 Rc1 looks horrendous for White.
Jul-15-05  aw1988: Oh, there is no perpetual here. Hmm.
Dec-21-06  waddayaplay: There is a perpetual at move 56.
Nov-08-08  michael.krink: 36 -d1Q looks god.
Nov-01-13  isemeria: Black to move 26...?


click for larger view

26...Bxa3!

"...the knight was ready to enter the play after Nc4, and Leko rightly estimated that in the forthcoming struggle the black knight would be stronger than his bishop." (M. Notkin in Leko's One Hundred Wins by Sergei Soloviov (2003))

In the diagram position I would probably not even consider ...Bxa3. It seems wrong to exchange a mobile bishop to a knight which doesn't seem to take part in the action for the moment. There are reasons why these guys are rated 1000 points higher than me.

Mar-13-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Game 2 of their 4 game finals match in the Candidates Tournament; Leko won the first two games and held on to win the match 2.5-1.5. Leko repeated his innovation 18..Rb8 that he had introduced successfully a few days earlier in game 1 of his semi final match with Shirov. Shirov had played the relatively quiet 19 f3; Topalov tried the sharper 19 g4 which Leko certainly was fully prepared for. 20..Bxb2 21 gxf..Bxa3? would have been refuted by 22 Rg1+..Ng6 23 Bxe4. Leko felt that Topalov, in his preparation, had under estimated 21..Kh8!. 26 Rf1?! is an odd looking move; Leko suggested 26 Qb3. 33 Rd1? was the beginning of the end for White; 33 Qd2 would have been better. In time trouble Leko played 36..Qxf6? missing 36..Ne4 37 Qxd4..Rxd4 38 Kg2..Nc3 39 Bd1..Rxb4 winning a piece or the equally strong 36..Rxb4. 40 Rh1 was a typical decision by Topalov giving up material for counterplay; 40 Qh5 would have held onto material but may not have improved his chances of saving the game. Apparently under the illusion that he was winning topalov played 56 Qf5? spurning the perpetual check with 56 Qh8+. Perhaps Topalov thought that 57 Re6 would have been winning but then realizing that 57..Rh7+ would have forced the exchange of rooks in fact winning for Black.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Leko!
by docjan
Lasker/ 9. BxNf6
from Sicilian by freeman8201
Qc3!
from Sicilian Pelikan by chessmani
Nyctalop's favorite games
by Nyctalop
Candidates Tournament 2002, Dortmund
from # Greatest Tournaments 2002 by Qindarka
Match Topalov!
by docjan
ChesterKing46's favorite games
by ChesterKing46
Sicilian Def: Lasker-Pelikan. Sveshnikov Var (B33) 0-1Stockfish
from Lasker-Pelikan. Sveshnikov by fredthebear
Match Topalov!
by amadeus
Final Game 2 July 19
from Dortmund Candidates 2002 by Tabanus
Match Leko!
by amadeus
Interesting games
by sculleyd

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC