chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Robert James Fischer vs Anthony LoCoco
"Livin' la Vida Lococo" (game of the day Aug-18-2005)
Simul, 71b (1964) (exhibition), Chicago, IL USA, Mar-22
Italian Game: Evans Gambit. Mieses Defense (C52)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,098 more games of Fischer
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: "I went to New York and within an hour I'd had my nipples pierced. They did catch the bloke, though."
Aug-18-05  markanton: 11 ... Nxf7 seems better to me.
Aug-18-05  buRnINGbeNd: <midknightblue> Chessgames never said that Nxf7 was not a mistake, in fact I can't find who did. Paul dorian said something close in that "Nxh7 is not a mistake." He is correct, and that is a main line. It seems odd that Fisher would make such a sacrifice(Nxf7) when there is a simple tactic at hand that guarantees good play.
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: <Midknightblue> 11.Nf7 is INDEED the move mentioned in the new Donaldson book "A Legend On The Road" It's a 2nd edition and revised. Could it be possible that this move is a mistake? It looks clear to me, what am I missing?
Aug-18-05  DanRoss53: Nevermind 11. ♘f7, but 19. ♕g6?; perhaps Fischer was being generous (seeing as this is a simul) and ignoring the winning line 19. ♕h7+ ♔f7 20. ♕xg7+ ♔e8 21. ♗g6+ ♗f7 22. ♖ae1+ ♘e7 23. ♗f6
Aug-18-05  Dres1: if it was Nxh7, then 17...h6 would be impossible
Aug-18-05  patzer2: Black's losing blunder was 18...Be6?? After 18...Bf5 19. Qg3 Qg5! , Black actually has slightly the better of it.
Aug-18-05  patzer2: I too find it hard to believe Fischer actually played 11. Nxf7?? since 11...Nxf7 is clearly winning for Black.

Of course it was only a simultaneous exhibition, so perhaps Fischer wanted to do something different and didn't mind giving piece odds in a "fun" game.

Aug-18-05  Woodpusher: <if it was Nxh7, then 17...h6 would be impossible> Of course, but 17...h6 is one bizarre move. It's as if Black is responding to a threat... but there isn't any.

A crazy idea: maybe 16.Qd4 c6 17.Bb2 (threatening mate) f6 was played. I like the idea but a few moves later the game falls apart.

I guess maybe it was Nxf7 after all.

Aug-18-05  patzer2: The score of this Fischer game really looks fishy. I can't believe Fischer would also have played the weak 19. Qg6?=, overlooking the clearly decisive 19. Qh7+! Kf7 20. Qxg7+ Ke8 21. Bg6+ Bf7 22. Rfe1+ Ne7 23. Bf6 .
Aug-18-05  patzer2: Black's final decisive error is 21...Nd5? Instead, 21...Bf7 22. Bb3 Bxb3 23. axb3 = gives Black full equality and excellent drawing chances.

After 21...Nd5? 22. Qh7+ , Black doesn't get any more chances as Fischer now has the win well under control.

Aug-18-05  belka: I think 14. d6+ just loses the d pawn.

White can pick up the Knight on e7 with the discovery, but the Bishop on c3 just took a piece so it's not winning a piece.

Then the pawn fork on e7 is not winning because black just takes the white queen.

Aug-18-05  mastrocira: 21)Rxe6 instant victory...
Aug-18-05  sneaky pete: <belka> It's 14.d6+ .. given as an improvement by <al wazir> earlier, not 14.Nxc3? Bxc3 15.d6+ .. etc.
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <belka: I think 14. d6+ just loses the d pawn.> How?

<White can pick up the Knight on e7 with the discovery, but the Bishop on c3 just took a piece so it's not winning a piece.> You're a move ahead. I'm suggesting 14. d6+ (not 15. d6+) instead of 14. Nxc3. If 14...Kh8, then 15. dxe7, threatening black's B, R, and Q simultaneously.

<Then the pawn fork on e7 is not winning because black just takes the white queen.> How?

Aug-18-05  RookFile: The whole game seems strange. Bobby plays 11. Nxf7, when he had plausible alternatives: 11. Nxh7, 11. cxd4, or maybe 11. Ba3

Then his opponent can play 11... Nxf7,
but takes with the king, when he can see clear as day that Qh5 or d6 could happen.

But, instead of playing 12. d6+ which wins on the spot for white, Bobby plays 12. Qh5+, allowing 12.... N7f6, with a slight edge for black.

Except that black meekly plays 12... Kg8.

Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <belka>: If 14. d6+ Kh8 15. dxe7 Bxc3, then 16. exd8(Q) Rxd8 (16...Bxe5 17. Qxf8#) 17. Qxc3. At this point Black's resignation would not be premature. <Chessgames.com> Fischer could never have played this game. You should delete it from your database.
Aug-18-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It felt like Lococo fell behind early and never could catch up;it is like chasing Tony Stewart.

Since it was a simultaneous exhibition-maybe Fischer didn't play his dead level best,so if he fell short of perfection,I could see why.

Aug-18-05  iron maiden: <kevin86> I think Smoke's more of a late charger, actually. Of course recently he's just been leading from flag to flag.
Aug-18-05  AgentRgent: <al wazir: If 14. d6+ Kh8 15. dxe7 Bxc3> At this point 15...Bxc3 is impossible, as Black cannot capture his own pawn.
Aug-18-05  AgentRgent: 14. d6+ Kh8 15. dxe7 Qe8 16. exf8=Q+ Qxf8 17. Ba3 Qd8 18. Rd1 seems to be sufficient for white.
Aug-18-05  RookFile: I don't know why it is felt that
Lococo fell behind early, when
11.... Nxf7 might have won the game
for him.

Then in the game, after the incorrect 12. Qh5+ by Fischer (12. d6+ should win) 12.. N7g6 is a slight advantage for black, rather than 12... Kg8

Aug-18-05  vinohradska: Check out this score sheet from the same tournament: http://www.geocities.com/bprice1949...

I wonder what the score sheet from this game looked like? I would guess that "Robert James Fischer vs A Lococo" is dubious at best, and fictional at worst. It just doesn't seem to make sense.

Aug-18-05  briiian13: I agree with al wazir. Why didnt Fischer just play 14.d6+ ??? Not only white takes knight on the next move, but either the black queen or rook is going to be captured with check again, and then the black bishop is on a5 is gone too!!!!!!! What the heck is the matter with Fischer??? Is this a game to show that even one of the greatest grandmasters of all time can overlook a totally obvious discovery tactic that even a 1400 can forsee?
Aug-18-05  vinohradska: Keep in mind that Fisher was apparently playing ~70 people at the same time. So who knows...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: EXHIBITION. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from -ER Fischer by fredthebear
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by trh6upsz
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by fredthebear
!! Fischer . Evans Gambit
from SUBLIME by wwm
Evans Gambit
by ParivelIM
Evans Gambit. Mieses Defense
from EVANS GAMBIT ACCEPTED by gambitfan
woodenbishop's favorite games #3
by woodenbishop
Do the Lococomotion (Annie K.) & Livin' la vida Lococo (tpstar)
from Punny Games vol. I by Memorable Quotes
5...Ba5 6.d4 exd4 7.O-O Nge7 8.Ng5 d5 9.exd5 Ne5 10.Bb3
from Evans Gambit by KingG
Evans Gambit
by Beatlesrob
Italian Game: Evans Gambit games
by vasileios
Evans Gambit
by Inlandmoon
3/22
from 1964 Fischer simul exhibition tour by gauer
Chicago, IL (+56 -4 =11) 22.03.1964
from A Legend on the Road (I) by MissScarlett
August 18: Livin' la Vida Lococo
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Evans Gambit. Mieses Def (C52) 1-0 Imperfect splatter but how!
from Attacks a2/a7, b2/b7 and c2/c7 ECO C by FTB by Del ToRo
Evans Gambit. Mieses Defense
from FISCHER GAMES by gambitfan

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC