chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Liu Wenzhe vs Jan Hein Donner
"The Chinese Immortal" (game of the day Jan-10-2009)
Olympiad (1978), Buenos Aires ARG, rd 8, Nov-02
Pirc Defense: Chinese Variation (B07)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 46 times; par: 22 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 1,322 more games of J H Donner
sac: 16.Qxg6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-14-11  sevenseaman: <David2009> <Confession time - first time around after 15...Qa5+ I played 16.Bd2? which wins on material - but the Q sacrifice no longer works (White's Bishop is pinned!).>

You are harsh on yourself. First time anyone could play those moves you went for. Now forewarned against Crafty I exactly knew what pieces are needed in the mating net later and kept them dry and handy.

Aug-14-11  sevenseaman: < DrMAL: A computer (with a bit more time to compute than the Crafty Endgame thing) reveals 14.Qh4!! or 14.Qh2!! is a forced mate in 10 (or less) after either 14...Bh3 or 14...Qa5).

I did not see this it is (extremely) far from obvious, and I sincerely doubt anyone on here did. I would have played 14.Nf3 probably winning. Brilliant move and great game by Liu!>

Thats too much of a blanket statement. Looking at the puzzle first time, Q check at h7 was the first thing I saw in a flash. Fortunately in this case that is all I needed to. How to get there was merely the mechanics of the combination. The chips just kept falling into place.

And I'd rate myself close to the humble 1000 or lower and do not use any cyber analysis at all. At times I fail to reach a solution, some days laughably simple and obvious in hindsight. Feeling awkwardly pedestrian is also a pleasure, of sorts.

I believe most solvers here are doing an honest day's work. How else would they attain any sense of fulfillment?

Aug-14-11  Patriot: <sevenseaman> <And I'd rate myself close to the humble 1000 or lower and do not use any cyber analysis at all.> NO WAY! You are much stronger than that! I personally know players around 1000 and they would never calculate the way you do. Judging from your analysis I would say you are AT LEAST 1700 USCF.
Aug-14-11  sevenseaman: <Patriot> I should feel flattered but I am a realist.

Rating a chess aficionado on the basis of his puzzle solutions posted from the comfort of his own drawing room could be dicey.

OTB is a different cup of tea and I am sure you'll realise the error of your ways some day.

Aug-14-11  CHESSTTCAMPS: In this opening position, white is down a pawn and has three undeveloped pieces, but controls that all important open h-file. The vulnerable castled black king is already close to being entombed. It is quickly seen that after 14.Qh2, the only way to avoid 15.Qh7# for black to play f6 or f5. The candidate 14.Nf6+ (?), an attempt to hold down the f7 escape hatch, is worth investigating, but after 14...Nxf6 (Bxf6?? 15.Qh2 wins immediately) 15.gf Bxf6 16.Qh2 Re8 the king escapes via f8.

So the forcing approach of direct threats is best:

14.Qh2! essentially limits black to two serious defensive tries which are virtually identical:

A) 14... f5 (or f6) 15.Qh7+ Kf7 16.Qxg6+!! (a familiar h-file attack tactic) Kxg6 17.Bh5+ Kh7 18.Bf7+ Bh6 19.g6+! (the key find for me) Kg7 (Kh8 20.Rxh6+ Kg7 21.Rh7#) 20.Bh6+ Kh8 21.Bxf8+ (mate in the case of 14.... f6) Qh4 22.Rxh4#

A.1) 17... Kg8 18.Qh7+ Kf7 19.Bh5#

B) 14... Nf6 15.gf Re8 16.Qh7+ Kf8 17.Qxg7#

14... Qa4+ (15.b4), 14... Bc3+, and 14... Bh3 are other options that delay mate by a few moves.

Time for review. Very pretty, but not particularly complex.

Aug-14-11  Patriot: <sevenseaman> You're just too modest!
Aug-15-11  DrMAL: <sevenseaman: Looking at the puzzle first time, Q check at h7 was the first thing I saw in a flash.> Solving a puzzle means to compute in one's head the entire set of possible sequences in advance. If you or anyone else actually did this, rather than looking ahead or stumbling into it or using a computer, congratulations. Again, I sincerely doubt it.
Aug-15-11  dumbgai: I love this game. A GM makes a couple of poor opening moves and he's dead meat just a dozen moves into the game.
Aug-16-11  50movesaheadofyou: A pirc defense, chinese variation? I didn't know there was such thing. This game is the birth of this variation I imagine.
Jan-20-12  pericles of athens: fantastic game! uber-aggressive play from white. wow.
Feb-18-12  Naniwazu: Saw this in Kavalek's column. Qxg6+ is a fantastic move!
Mar-05-12  LawrenceBernstein: Donner once asked a colleague, "how can a western gm lose to a chinese player?" boy, did he find out.
Jul-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: < LawrenceBernstein: Donner once asked a colleague, "how can a western gm lose to a chinese player?" boy, did he find out.>

Did he ever-the full quote's here, according to Speelman. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_He...

Nov-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <50movesaheadofyou: A pirc defense, chinese variation? I didn't know there was such thing. This game is the birth of this variation I imagine.>

There's nothing new under the sun. The line (4.Be2 Bg7 5.g4!?) had been played before, unsuccessfully, in F Blatny vs Vadasz, 1974.

After this spectacular win, the line was indeed dubbed the "Chinese Variation." Objectively, I don't think it's any great shakes. Seirawan won elegantly against it in V Kovacevic vs Seirawan, 1980. Since then, the line has been played rarely, and mostly by lesser lights. http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... But it certainly worked great against Donner's cooperative play (7...0-0?).

Nov-20-12  SimonWebbsTiger: @<FSR>

The variation also has the nickname "the Spike". Interestingly, John Nunn gave the Seirawan game as his main line in "The Complete Pirc" (pp.210-211, Batsford 1989). James Vigus in "the Pirc in Black and White" (pp. 366-370, Everyman 2007) also gives the Seirawan game.

Nunn (unclear) and Andrew Martin ( ) recommend 9. a3 as an improvement on that game, and thus Vigus recommends 5...d5 instead of Seirawan's 5...c6.

In Vigus' opinion, the Spike is a bit more potent when delayed by 5. Be3 0-0 6. g4! English FM Graham Lee has played this for a quarter century.

Nov-20-12  Abdel Irada: Another act of auto-cannibalism by Donner.
Nov-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Abdel Irada> Yup. A classic "Donner Partie."
Nov-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <SimonWebbsTiger: ... English FM Graham Lee has played this for a quarter century.>

Ah. He must be the "G. Lee" I always see in game scores.

Aug-28-13  ajile: Black 0-0 right into the attack.

Here is Seirawan's improvement:

V Kovacevic vs Seirawan, 1980

Jul-25-14  ColeTrane: Milton's Immortal: Buddha vs. Shiva
Jul-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Lean more towards a shiksa myself.
Feb-25-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: I think Black's misery in this game can be blamed on the nervous 5...h6 in response to White's g4. This is the move that set the table for the opening of the h file and the ensuing tactical fireworks.

I couldn't imagine a top rated player making such a move today.

Jan-07-18  brimarern: Mating Net, even though ...h6, was part of the problem, Donner made a bunch of questionable moves afterwards...c5, and the most questionable move -castling into a ready made attack, with the center closed.

It is an awesome game to play over, but to be quite honest, 5.g4 is provocative to the highest degree. However, provocative moves can be dangerous if met incorrectly. What awes me is the antidote to this provocation 5..d5! moving a pawn twice in the opening, goes against opening principles -is hard to find if your mind is locked on playing "properly".

Sep-09-18  Rubenchik: Dvoretsky says about 8.h4! "prophylaxis"
Aug-31-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2...

"Big Dragon" strategy saw its first dividend payout after 8 years.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
pirc defense
from erdogankilic's short games by erdogankilic
This is one serious Q Sac!!!
from 1970s Carter, Rocky, Three Dog Night, Star Wars, by fredthebear
14.? (August 14, 2011)
from Sunday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni
Proud Chinese
from 1978 Chess Olympiad by chessmoron
55
from 200 Modern Brilliancies (Wicker) by fredthebear
Pirc, Chinese Variation Be2, g4 (B07) 1-0 The Chinese Immortal
from yCheckmate # Fredthebear Mating Patterns by hought67
Pirc Defense
by sycophante
One of the most unexpected Queen sacs ever...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by Trigonometrist
Aggressive way to play against the Pirc
from Model games by DanielLam
The Chinese Immortal
from Brilliancies By "Unknowns" by TheAlchemist
14. Qh4!! solves a Sunday puzzle
from Weakened Castled Position by Jaredfchess
14. Qh4!! solves a Sunday puzzle
from Weakened Castled Position by trh6upsz
Danufane's favorite games
by Danufane
Open h-file
from spudhead's favorite games by spudhead
FP's Yearly Best Games (1950 - present)
by FairyPromotion

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC