Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Vladimir Malakhov vs Zurab Azmaiparashvili
EU-ch 4th (2003), Istanbul TUR, rd 9, Jun-08
Modern Defense: King Pawn Fianchetto (B06)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 1,446 more games of V Malakhov
sac: 40...Rxg4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-05-04  PinkPanther: How on earth is this the English Opening? It seems more like some sort of a King's Pawn game to me. Or maybe some sort of a really strange Pirc Defense. In fact, white never even plays c4, he doesn't even move the c pawn at all until move 39.
Nov-02-04  capablancakarpov: In this famous game Zurab played 25...Be5?? losing a rook.Then,he simply took the move back and continued playing.Later Zurab won the game and the European Championship,while Vladimir went on to finish second,so Zurabīs illegal manoeuvre was decisive.
Jul-18-05  EmperorAtahualpa: <capablancakarpov> I remember Ray Keene suggesting the move that Azmaiparashvili took back was 20...Rd8. Are you sure you are right?
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <Emperor> I've also read, that he played 25...Be5??, but took it back and played 25...Rxd1.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: So this is Azmaiparashvili's famous "cheating" game, making him EU-Ch 2003.

Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: sidelight of the game from GM Genna Sosonko's book Smart Chip from St. Petersburg..

Both grandmasters were fighting for the lead, and the encounter had huge sporting significance. In an ending that was favourable to him, Azmai picked up the bishop, intending to make a move with it instead of first exchanging rooks.

Malakhov recalled: "Seeing that the rooks were still on the board, he said something like, "Oh, first the exchange, of course." put his bishop back, took my rook, and the game continued. I don't know what should have been done differently in this situation --- in Azmai's place, some might have resigned immediately, and in my place, some would have demanded that he make a move with his bishop but I didn't want to ruin the logical development of the duel, so I didn't object when Azmai made a different move: the mistake was obviously nothing to do with chess! When we signed the score sheets, Azmai suggested to me that we consider the game a draw. After the game I was left with an unpleasant aftertaste, but that was due mainly to my own play."

Nov-07-11  hedgeh0g: The fact that he offered to call it a draw indicates that he <knew> what he did was wrong. In the final position, Malakhov should have quietly reset the pieces and played 1.d4, commenting, "Oh, 1.d4, of course."
Nov-07-11  Shams: <I didn't want to ruin the logical development of the duel>

I feel this way a lot. A guy I play speed chess with won't let me give him backsies, even though I routinely beat him anyway.

A rule has evolved: if after he blunders, I'm able to whip the clock off the table before he punches it, the move does not count (here in Seattle we play "clock move" not "touch move" rules for blitz) and he is "allowed" (compelled) to make another. It adds an amusing element to the game.

Mar-19-16  vasparov19: wow. and against nakamura nepomniachtchi he said that even though nakamura castled with 2 hands, nakamura wins because , of some stupid reason. come on azmai!
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: The hand of the master strikes again.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collection[what is this?]
ianremsen's favorite games
by ianremsen

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC