chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Todd Q Miller vs Roman Dzindzichashvili
"Rise and Fall of Roman's Empire" (game of the day Oct-07-2004)
Master Challenge (1984), Chicago (USA), rd 5, Jun-24
English Opening: King's English Variation. Kramnik-Shirov Counter (A21)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 902 more games of Dzindzichashvili
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-03-04  Spassky69: Did you know Dzindzichasvili threw the board over when Todd won!? I bet no one here knew that because me and Todd were just talking after a game over Chess Live about the highest rated player we beat and it was amazing to hear he beat Dzindzi and he threw a temper tantrum after the game. What amazed me is since me and Todd are both the same rating that could have been me playing him! But what's even more amazing is that Todd quit playing chess for 20 years in his prime! Now he's ready for a Korchnoi/Smyslov like comeback!
Oct-04-04  Spassky69: Plus Dzindzich might have done more than that but I don't know
Oct-07-04  patzer2: Could it be that Dzindzichasvili was upset about his own play with 32...Rc1??
Oct-07-04  Hoozits: This isn't the only time I've heard of a GM or even a master throwing a fit after a loss to a "lesser" player. What is it the the typical ego problems of many chess players? Is chess what they use to validate themselves as worthwhile human beings?
Oct-07-04  Chesspatch: <Hoozits> I would too, if chess was the only thing I was good at and also my source of income and ego.
Oct-07-04  JohnBoy: Lots of strong players throw tantrums. Fischer lost famously to Mednis in the US championship and never faced Mednis with resignation. He adjourned and went to the TD (Kmoch, I believe) the next day with his resignation. Never shook Mednis' hand. Never spoke to him. Never acknowledged getting his ass handed to him on a platter.
Oct-07-04  patzer2: Learning to be a gracious loser is something most of us amateurs have had more practice at than the Chess professionals, but that's a poor excuse for boorish and outlandish behavior. However, to be fair, the great majority of Chess professionals I have observed seem to accept such defeats graciously. Peter Leko in particular was very gracious and positive after his recent first game loss to Kramnik in their wolrd championship match. Perhaps that positive attitude helped him to recover for his fifth game victory to tie the match.
Oct-07-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black is in zugzwang and must yield his pawns to the white king-he is smashed to bits! Wasn't Roman the gritty master in the park in SEARCHING FOR BOBBY FISCHER?
Oct-07-04  jjack: Wasn't it RĂ©ti who wrote that "chess is quintessentially a pursuit for the unappreciated," or something to that effect? Also, shouldn't it be "DECLINE and fall of Roman's empire"?
Oct-07-04  rookies: Hi! I'm new to chess and I find it very exiting. I am wondering..what will happen if black moves ...Rc1 instead of ...Nd7 at line 30??
Oct-07-04  patzer2: <Rookies> Your 30...Rc1 looks to be a good choice in keeping the White Rook off the open file, before moving the Knight to a new post. It might have avoided the predicament Black found himself in a few moves later.
Oct-08-04  n30: I'm nowhere near as good a player as the guys (and few girls) who have listed their games here, but I'd say it doesn't matter what level people play at. I have encountered people smashing boards and just 'losing' it no matter what level; even simple social occasions. I think what it is, is that you simply can't blame anything/anyone else than yourself if you lose. No dice, no cards, no 'destiny', just your own (temporary - hopefully, hehe) 'stupidity'. And I'm no exception either. I play online chess a lot and I had to buy a punching bag :O)~
Oct-08-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <n30> Hello! Welcome to the group! I agree how temper tantrums after losing are uncalled for, yet I wonder if many competitors (especially young folks) attribute that feature into some nebulous "will to win" characteristic making it appear positive in a skewed sense. Also consider how you can play quite well but lose only because your opponent outplayed you and not necessarily due to stupidity (although I know all about that!). Like in this game, where Black looked great but the protected passed Pawn proved decisive after a seemingly minor slip. As to online chess, sometimes it's a blatant blunderfest, so remember not to punch the computer!

<rookies> I like your improvement of 30 ... Rc1, then Black probably should centralize the King before reposting the Knight. What would be best play after 30 ... Rxd3 instead?

Oct-08-04  clendenon: I once played Roman. I lost on time while filling out the scoresheet. Couldn't get the name right. I spelled it Dzingdzingdihasvilli.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
October 7: Rise and Fall of Roman's Empire
from Game of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
October 7: Rise and Fall of Roman's Empire
from Game of the Day 2004 by Jaredfchess
Game of the Oct-07-04
from Games of the day 5 by Herkus

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC