chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Siegbert Tarrasch vs Nathan Mannheimer
"Better than Nathan" (game of the day Sep-21-2005)
Breslau (1880)
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense. Open Variation (C55)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 17 times; par: 39 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2 more Tarrasch/N Mannheimer games
+ sac: 25.Qd7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Another good pun, if you know music, is "Mannheimer Steamrolled."
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Already taken = N Mannheimer vs Nimzowitsch, 1930
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: I think black can defend by playing 25...Be7. Then after 26. Rxe7 Nxe7 27. Qxe7 Qxh6 or 26. Bg7+ Nxg7 27. Rxe7 Re8, black threatens a back-row mate.
Sep-21-05  woodenbishop: A true Tarrasch classic!
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  khense: 26 Bg7+ a hard move for humans to see (but not for computers). Thank god computers don't get to enjoy their moves!
Sep-21-05  xenophon: reminds me of the obstetrician asking a new mother "what are you going to call your son,Mrs Jones?" "Nathan" comes the reply;to which the doctor retorts "Nathan!you can't call him Nathan! you have to call him something"
Sep-21-05  IT4LICO: If 26 ..,Nxh6 27 Rg3; if 26 ..,Qxh6; 27 Qe8+,Kg7 28 Qg8#
Sep-21-05  YouRang: Very appropriate pun for this game. It seems that from about move 10 forward, Tarrasch is firing all of the shots, and Mannheimer is just trying to hold it together.
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: It looks like Mannheimer was trying the rope-a-dopa vs Tarrasch and he is no Ali! He got manhandled. Let's face it,Nathan is a hot dog!! (New Yorkers will get that one.)
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <kevin86> Takeru Kobayashi will eat him up alive... (under 2 seconds too!)
Sep-21-05  p8riot: But for the Bishop pin, 22. ...RxR 23.QxR QxQ#
Sep-21-05  Calculon: Should black have given up a pawn and played 9 ... d5 to free up his queen side pieces? Would he have been better off?
Sep-21-05  EmperorAtahualpa: Nice game of the day!

Is 25...Qxh6 not a defensive option for Black?

Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <EmperorAtahualpa> On 25 ... Qxh6 White has Mate in Two with 26. Re8+ or 26. Qe8+.

<al wazir> Yes, 25 ... Be7 should win the exchange for Black (26. Rxe7 Nxe7) because the Bh6 is attacked twice. Note 26. Bf4? Rd8 and the weak back rank is fatal for White.

This is a markedly inferior 2N line where Black's Knights clutter up the center. Look at the position after 16 ... Nd6 and I would bet White would win 10 out of 10 from here. Black has much better practical chances entering the Max Lange (4 ... ed 5. 0-0 Bc5).

Sep-21-05  samvega: <al wazir>, <tpstar> I'm gonna to stick up for my homeboy Siegbert: 25..Be7! 26.Rd3 Qxh6 (not Nxh6 27.Qxe7 Re8 28.Rd8 nor Rd8 27.Qxd8+ etc) 27.g4 Bd6 28.Qxf5 Qxh2+ maybe draws.

<tpstar> 25..Be7 26.Bf4 Rd8 27.Rxe7 Rxd7 28.Rxd7 gives the advantage to white doesn't it? Wouldn't it just be 26..Nxe3?

Sep-21-05  lentil: seems that 11. .. Kh8 (rather than the retrogressive ..Bd8) would have been much better. unpinned, the N/e6 covers c7, and B retains the option of recapturing on f6 with the B.
Sep-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <samvega> 1) After 25 ... Be7 26. Rd3 Qxh6 27. g4!? Black has 27 ... Nh4 and the Be7 is immune (28. Qxe7? Qc1+ mates) and then 28 ... Bd6 keeps the extra piece. 2) 25 ... Be7 26. Bf4? Rd8 27. Rxe7!? Rxd7 28. Rxd7 Qe8 29. Rd1 Qe2 and Black will romp in the endgame with Q for RB. Yet 26 ... Nxe3 looks simpler at first glance, forcing 27. fxe3 (27. Bxe3? Rd8 so there :p) due to the mate threat on g2. But then the Pc7 falls, so White has 2 Pawns for the exchange. I prefer the first option, but both lines should win.
Sep-22-05  psmith: <tpstar> <samvega> Chesslab.com's computer suggests 25... Be7 26. Re1 with advantage to white. If 26... Nxh6 27. Qxe7; if 26... Qxh6 27. Qxf5; if 26... Bd6 27. Be3. white is a pawn up at least in all lines.
Sep-22-05  samvega: <tpstar> I seem to do this a lot: I could swear I looked at 27..Nh4 (the obvious rejoinder), but now I don't remember what I had in mind! Perhaps it was 28.Re3 Bf8 29.Qe6, but black defends easily... I admit defeat.

Regarding the second variation, 29..Qe2 is taboo because 30.Rd8+ heads to mate (so there :p) (but maybe black is better nevertheless...?).

<psmith> Thanks. Takes a computer to show how simple it is! 25..Be7 26.Re1 Rd8 27.Qxc7, now 27..Qxh6?? 28.Qxd8+ Bxd8 29.Re8+, or 26..Nh4 27.Bd5 Rd8 28.Qxe7. That Siegburt!

Sep-22-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: <samvega> Oh right, I was just testing you - I meant 29 ... Nd4 because 30. Rxd4? Qe1# heads to mate (so there :p) but yes I forgot that the Bishops cover f7 & h6, so the Queen can't abandon the back rank yet. I wonder what the computer thinks about 25 ... Be7 26. Re1 Nh4 - probably the boring 27. Qh3.

Don't say "defeat," partner - we're here to learn together. =)

Mar-24-14  ralph46: I was doing the game on the guess the move and at the end was wondering why black did not play 25 ..Be7 i do not have an engine but found a move for white 26 Bf7 black can take either bishop and white takes the knight on f5 if 26..Qg4 simply 27 h3
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Everything about attack
by KASTILOWSKY
Game 9
from Tarrasch's 300 Chess Games by yesthatwasasac
Game 9, Bresslau 1862-1880
from Tarrasch's Dreihundert Schachpartien by Honza Cervenka
September 21: Better than Nathan
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
3
from Veliki majstori saha 6 TARRASCH (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
Game 9
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Qindarka
Game 9
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Incremental
woodenbishop's favorite games #3
by woodenbishop
castillov's favorite games
by castillov
Everything about attack Compiled by KASTILOWSKY
by fredthebear
Move 25
from ianD's sneaky bishop moves by ianD
Lg7+, DxLg7, De8++! (Vit löpare b3 täcker)
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC