Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Nigel Short vs Zhong Zhang
International Kings Challenge (2003), Beijing CHN, rd 2, Sep-22
Italian Game: Evans Gambit (C51)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 31 times; par: 53 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 2,799 more games of Short
sac: 19.Rxe6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can see a list of all games that they have seen recently at their Game History Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-01-03  Phoenix: Big oops here.
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: I'm pleasantly surprised a super GM would play the Evans Gambit, and a little disappointed that his strong GM opponent would decline it. Short appears to gain a lasting initiative and then a decisive advantage after the exchange sacrifice. Although black's 26. ..Rd6 allows white's winning combination, starting with 27. Qxf4, other alternatives appear to allow white to maintain the advantage -- due to the ideal posting of his pieces, his extra pawn and the pressure on black's isolated pawn.
Oct-01-03  NiceMove: What about 14. Rxf4 Qg5 (not 14 ... Qxf4 because 15. Ng6+) 15. h4 Qh5 16. Rxf6 gxf 17. Nf7+ and now white is up another a piece, rather than the exchange.
Oct-01-03  Alyosha Karamazov: <NiceMove> I too wonder about 27. Rxf4 (incidentally, you meant move 27, not 14, right?). Does anyone else have an analysis of that move? I'm not so sure about the rest of your continuation as Black would just capture the Knight after Nf7+. It seems Short's intention was not just winning back the exchange, but also getting down to the endgame quickly, where Black's lone rook would be insufficient to guard all those pawns.
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <NiceMove/Alyosha Karamazov> NiceMove's 27. Rxf4 wins after 27. ..Qxe5 [27. ..Qg5 28. h4 Qxe5 (28. ..Qh4 29. Rxf6! gxf6 30. g4! Qe8 31. Qxh6+ Kg8 32. Qxf6 Qf8 33. Bxe6 Rxe6 34. Qxe6+ ) 29. dxe5 Rxd2 30. exf6] 28. dxe5 Rxd2 29. exf6.

However, Short's choice of 27. Qxf4 is also a pretty forced win. So, both 27. Rxf4 and 27. Qxf4 are forced wins, with the choice being a matter of style and personal preference.

Premium Chessgames Member
  crafty: 27. ♖xf4 ♕g5 28. h4 ♕xf4 29. ♘g6+ ♖xg6 30. ♕xf4   (eval 6.97; depth 16 ply; 500M nodes)
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Was Short's 16. d4 a brilliant move setting a trap for his opponent to "win the exchange" and give white a strong positional advantage, or was it simply a tactical oversight? Was Zhang Zhong's 16. ..Nxe5 a combination that backfired, or did black just misplay the position after "winning the exchange?"
Oct-15-03  Johannes: White played the evans gambit aggressively, just like PAtzer had mentioned ( a surprise). I think this surprise was the reason that got white the initiative+ the tempo, while Zhang zhong was playing along in some sort of following the leader fashion against an unusual opening at this level of chess. (nerveracking) And I definately do agree with RXG4, but at that level of play I think he just wanted to cut all the B.S by simplifying the game. cause after Rxg4, Qxe4 does leave black some chances and opportunities, as the game is still far from over. Zhang Zhong's 16th move was definately a reasonable one, as short really came forward with an unexpected response going rook for a piece and a pawn. I believe for the most part that most players wouldn't have the courage to play at short's fashion, moving the rook back giving the peice back. If that were the case black would have the advantage. I just think its zhang's bad luck playing short at that particular position.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 26...Rd6 was a blunder. Black should have played 26...Kg8 at first. I think that then position looks quite balanced.
Mar-06-04  InspiredByMorphy: This might make a good puzzle of the day at move 27 that could say white to play and win. Move 18 is also noteworthy of Short. Powerful play.
May-19-08  JLDATE: Is 27 Rxf4-Qxf4 with 28 Ng6 a better result?
Jun-12-14  Whitehat1963: What's the finish?
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Evans Gambit
by ParivelIM
26...Kg8! instead of 26...Rd6??
from Defensive Combinations by patzer2
4...Bb6 5.a4 a6 6.c3 Nf6 7.d3 d6 8.O-O O-O 9.Nbd2 Ne7 10.a5
from Evans Gambit by KingG
evans gambit
by nadvil
Evans Gambit
by Inlandmoon
27. Qxf4!
from Knight Forks by patzer2
26...Kg8! instead of 26...Rd6??
from Defensive Combinations by nakul1964
Italian Game: Evans Gambit Declined Bb6
from EVANS GAMBIT GTM by gambitfan
Games Involving Queen Sacrifices
by Ron
26...Kg8! instead of 26...Rd6??
from Defensive Combinations by xajik

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC