chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
John Cochrane vs Howard Staunton
London m2 (1842)
Sicilian Defense: Bowdler Attack (B20)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 104 more Cochrane/Staunton games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 7...g5 is a clever trap, but 7...Nxg2+ 8.Kd1 (8.Kf1 d5 9.exd6 e.p. f5 10.Qe2 Nf4 etc.) 8...d5 9.exd6 e.p. f5 10.Qe2 Nf4 11.Qe3 Bxd6 etc. would have been objectively better. After 8.0-0 f5 9.Qe3 white seems to be over the worst. Of course, 8.g3?? loses the Queen.
Jan-06-04  Nova1990: Welcome back, Honza! Since you’ve been gone, one of your games has been the puzzle of the day: Jan Cervenka vs NN, 2002 Also, there are some questions on your page: Jan Cervenka
Oct-16-04  Knight13: Bringing the Queen out too early is a mistake. 10. Qe3 Ng2+ 1-0.
Oct-16-04  Spassky69: 10 bucks says Stanton would be rated 1450 if he came to the future.
Oct-16-04  clocked: <Spassky69> Probably so; however, Staunton certainly would not.
Oct-09-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.25.

Cochrane 3 mistakes:
5.Nc3 -0.41 (5.c3 -0.14)
7.Qe4 -0.77 (7.Qf1 -0.42)
8.g3 -2.38 (8.Bb5 -0.03)

Staunton 1 mistake:
7...g5 -0.03 (7...Nxg2+ -0.77)

Oct-11-07  nimh: Correction, new threshold 0.33.

Cochrane 2 mistakes:
7.Qe4 -0.77 (7.Qf1 -0.42)
8.g3 -2.38 (8.Bb5 -0.03)

Staunton 1 mistake:
7...g5 -0.03 (7...Nxg2+ -0.77

Dec-07-08  newzild: Good Tuesday or Wednesday puzzle here: Move 8, black to play.

Dec-24-08  zzzzzzzzzzzz: litte john takes a fall
Dec-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Queen trap in the middle of the board in NINE moves!
Jul-05-14  Rickyroller5: If you're playing a Sicilian Defense, are you the black or white pieces?

Forgive my ignorance.

Jul-05-14  Shams: <Rickyroller5> This is one of those questions where the answer is simple but the way players describe their games confuses the issue. Technically all defenses are played by the Black pieces, since it is White who opens hostilities and the second player who responds. (Although particularly tame systems for White are sometimes derisively, and jokingly, referred to as "defenses", e.g. the "Colle Defense". ) So it is always Black who *plays* the Sicilian Defense, in the sense that it is he who ultimately steers the game in that direction. White invites many defenses when he opens 1.e4, among them the very popular Sicilian; when Black replies 1...c5 he officially stamps the game a "Sicilian Defense".

But at the risk of stating the obvious: even if Black chooses to make the game a Sicilian Defense, both players end up *playing* the game. Thus it's perfectly normal to hear things like "I played a sharp Sicilian" or "so-and-so had some great games in the French [Defense]", where in both cases the speaker might well be referring to the player of the *White* pieces. (A very common follow-up question to these statements is "with White or Black?")

Sometimes openings are described by the choices White finally makes (King's Gambit, Torre Attack, Spanish, Italian etc) and sometimes by the choices Black finally makes (Benko Gambit, King's Indian Defense, French Defense, Grunfeld etc). Over time, this has proved the most convenient way to talk about the opening phase of chess. Everyone understands implicitly which player has final say in "choosing" each particular opening.

I hope this has not further confused you.

Jul-06-14  Rickyroller5: <Shams> No, no on the contrary, it has clarified it for me. Thank you for your reply. I thought there was a "Sicilian" AND a "Sicilian Defense." In other words, if one played a Sicilian, then the other player could counter with a Sicilian Defense. lol I get the picture now. 1.e4 c5, IS the Sicilian Defense. Correct?

Then from there, of course are all the variations.

I also found out that "Defense" can be spelled; defense or defence. But 'defense' is the preferred American spelling. At least according to Wikipedia.

Jul-06-14  Shams: <Ricky> <I get the picture now. 1.e4 c5, IS the Sicilian Defense. Correct?> Yes.
Jul-06-14  RookFile: By the way, is this one of those games where black moved first? :)
Aug-19-14  yureesystem: What a masterpiece, well done, Staunton!!!
Dec-08-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  Korora: There appear to have been two ways to get the ♕ out of the trap, neither of them available after move 7. 7.♕d1 would have undeveloped the ♕, giving Staunton important tempo gains. But 7.♕f1 could have been followed by a discovered attack on Staunton's ♘ with 8.d4, which would also get the Queen ♗ into the game (unless I overlooked something).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Destroying the Queen
from kingofdallas' favorite games by kingofdallas
Brutal Attacking Chess
by JoseTigranTalFischer
sicilian 2 Bc4
by DarkHorse
Trapped Queen
from Accidents in the opening by Honza Cervenka
e4addict's favorite games
by e4addict
Sicilian Opening Traps for Black
by isolatedpawn
Brutal Attacking Chess
by Timothy Glenn Forney
Miniatures
by ALL
Game collection: 1
by p2c
Game collection: 1
by ph2ca
zumakal blunders archivadas7
by zumakal
The trap of the collection...
from Collections in Idleness 4 by Trigonometrist
Game collection: 6
by gr2ca
Chess Prehistory
by Joe Stanley
lazintata's_semi_open-french&sicilian
by lazintata
Part 3 of BEST GAMES EVER
by dull2vivid
combos
by had2x
Noted-n-Notable-Games of Morphy-n-Staunton
by saveyougod
SICILIAN'S-DEFENCE
by saveyougod
Sicilian Defense: Bowlder Attack
from The Sicilian Defense by Ray From Little Rhody by RayDelColle
plus 50 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC