chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Johann Jacob Loewenthal vs Howard Staunton
Birmingham (1858), Birmingham ENG, rd 2, Aug-29
Scandinavian Defense: Modern Variation (B01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Loewenthal/Staunton games
sac: 16.Bxh7+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-04  Knight13: 16. Bxh7+! Works best for the Open King!
Nov-15-05  JYMMI: interesting... 2 knights for 1 bishop a great trade of pieces... for black but white won... great
May-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: A game that changed the the course of Chess History.

This game and Staunton vs Loewenthal, 1858 were the reason why Staunton never played Morphy.

Staunton was going to use Birmingham as practice to get his eye in for the Morphy match.

Löwenthal had just been walloped by Morphy 9-3. and now Löwenthal takes Staunton 2-0.

It would have been just too embarrassing and given his ever growing number of enemies something to gloriously gloat over.

Blame Löwenthal for the non-match. If he had beaten Morphy then Staunton would played or if he had lost 2-0 to Staunton then again it would have been match on.

May-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Sally Simpson> Interesting take. Personally, I think Staunton would've played well vs Morphy. He would've lost, but given a reasonable amount of time to prepare, I don't think he would've been trounced. Thats just me and I'm a huge Morphy backer
May-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Morf,

I have a house full of chess books and they were mislaid all over the place.

I'm often seen wandering from room to room looking for a missing book which needs consulting. Recently I found a lost copy of 'The Chess Mind' by Abrahams behind the pop up toaster.

So in despair I recently organised my entire collection into one room and placed them in order in some freshly purchased library cabinets. (£10.00 job lot from a Charity Shop + £5.00 delivery fee.)

Games Collections, Openings, (I have 100's of these things), endings (very few) and Miscellaneous (where I discovered I have quite a few doublers including a tripler of 'Simple Chess' by Michael Stean. )

With everything neat and tidy I noticed I had a small gap amongst my 'Game Collections' which includes all World Championship matches. (1972 including doublers takes up an entire shelf).

So I'm shuffling the books about trying to fill the gap and I attempt to squeeze Part II of 'My Great Predecessors' the one covering Euwe to Tal into the gap when the side of the library case splits open (2nd hand junk) and I'm covered and smothered in a deluge of chess books.

If Staunton had played Morphy there would have been a book and it would have fitted perfectly into that gap.

I'm blaming Löwenthal.

(Staunton was the umpire for the Morphy - Löwenthal match. He could see at close quarters what he was up against. Staunton was a good player in his day but he had rested on his laurels for too long and it's not a crime to grow old.)

Book cabinet fixed with Bostic.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Quarter-final (Chess Praxis, 1860, p.445; The Era, 1860.04.01)
from Birmingham 1858 by MissScarlett

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC