Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Siegbert Tarrasch vs Aron Nimzowitsch
Hamburg (1910), Hamburg GER, rd 6, Jul-23
Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense. Symmetrical Variation (D40)  ·  0-1



explore this opening
find similar games 11 more Tarrasch/Nimzowitsch games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-08-04  who: Fritz thinks 15.gxf3 was a big mistake because 15...Nfd5! 16.Qe4 (not 16.cxd5 Qg5+ 17.Kh1 Qf4 and white must sacrifice a queen to stop mate) Qg5+ 17.Qg4 Qh6 18.h4 Rxc4
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Tarrasch missed 29.Bb1!
Dec-11-04  drukenknight: maybe so but they are playing an end game and Tarrasch is messing up. Look at moves 52/53. What is he doing with the K? The K is the primary blockader, we see this over and over. 52 a4? great, open up another hole.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Dr T plays a4 because Black is preparing b5 which would break up Whites's pawns at c4-d5 and win the game. He is lost becuase he can't allow b4, but if he plays as in the game, the K-side pawns march in.
Dec-12-04  drukenknight: the K is supposed to be right in front of blacks pawns, why he moved him (move 52) I dont know. Why cant he cover the b pawn with the B? 53 a4 looks wrong also but maye the position is lost at that pt. What does your pc say? can he move the B on move 53.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Put the Black king on c5 and the knight on d6. Put the a-pawn back on a3 and the B where ever you want, the K blocking the pawns on e3/d3. Then b5 breaks down any defenses, so a4 is forced.
Dec-12-04  drukenknight: I got a better idea. Let's go back to move 51 and I play 51 BxN.

Is it any clearer now?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <drukenknight> I believe that Tarrasch's <51.fxe5+> was the best move in the position:

<51.Bxh5> gxh5 52.a4 Kc5 53.Kd2 a6 54.Ke2 b5 55.cxb5 (55.axb5 a5) 55...axb5 56.axb5 (56.a5 Kxd5 57.a6 Kc6 58.a7 Kb7) 56...Kxb5 57.d6 Kc6 58.Ke3 Kxd6 59.Kf3

Dec-12-04  drukenknight: well that's a lot to digest, before I get to your line, why logically is 51 fxe5+ best? To me, there is no logical imperative to take that pawn, since if there is no danger that black will take him (that would triple pawns)

so may be that little battle can be forestalled for a moment. It seems a positional problem here...what is your reasoning?

Dec-12-04  drukenknight: chessical: do you want to continue this?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <drukenknight> Yes, I do - but please remember that not only am I in a different time zone to you, but that I do have a life away from here!

I do not agree that: <there is no logical imperative to take that pawn>.

1. Black is poised to take the <f> pawn with his N which is an easy win.

2. White cannot protect the <f> pawn.

3. Taking with the B leads to a lost K+P ending (as above)

Dec-12-04  drukenknight: lost? I disagree. you placed white K on the wrong square to start this :

53 Ke2


Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <chessical> Its useless and a waste of time. SHOW ME YOUR IGNORE LIST :-)
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <drukenknight> The winning line is:

<53.Ke2> Kxc4 54.d6 Nf6 55.Bc2 e4 56.Ke3 Kd5 57.Kf4 Kxd6

Unless I am shown analysis to indicate otherwise, I believe that this exhausts the matter.

Dec-13-04  drukenknight: chessical, you are working the wrong line. My 53 Ke2 was in response to your proposed line: 52 Bxh5 gxh5 52.a4 Kc5 53..

I was not very clear when I typed that, I meant that you had put my K on the wrong square in that line we were discussing.

It's very clear I wanted to swap B for N at the outset; but then you thought I was starting over at move 53. No, I think it is messed up there.

sorry about that. Shall we start this over?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <drukenknight> Tarrasch cannot deal with both the <a> and the <e> pawns any better by exchanging off the N:

<51.Bxh5> gxh5 52.a4 Kc5 <53.Ke2> e4 54.Kd2 a6 55.Kc3 b5 56.axb5 a5: then either,

(a) <57.d6> Kxd6 58.b6 a4 59.b7 Kc7 60.Kb4 e3; or

(b) <57.b6> Kxb6 58.Kd4 a4 59.c5+ Kc7 60.Kc4 a3 61.Kb3 e3

which are equally hopeless for White.

Dec-13-04  drukenknight: a different K move and it lasts a few moves longer but you are right, it is lost.

So where is the losing move, move 29??

Jan-16-05  aw1988: drukenknight, you need to rephrase that.


Jul-30-05  Koster: Where is the game where Tarrasch said after 10 moves "Never have a had such a won position"? I think it ended in a draw but Nimzovich never forgave the insult.
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: The game you mention was played in Nuremberg 1904, but it was an informal game at a club, not a tournament game. The game can be found in Raymond Keene's excellent book, "Aron Nimzowitsch: A Reappraisal". It doesn't seem to be on the site games, probably because it was not from a formal tournament.Your correct that the final result was a draw. Paul Albert
Jul-30-05  Koster: Paul- Thank you. I think I still have that book (which is excellent) but haven't unpacked all my books since moving. Instead I seem to keep acquiring more.
Aug-01-08  fictionist: <A young Nimzowitsch using successfully the Tarrasch variation against Tarrasch himself.>

And defeating the man who criticized his unusual style of play. :)

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <who>

If <15...Nh5!!> White is completely lost. After <16.f4 Nxf4 17.Qf3 Qh4 18.Rfe1 Rxc4 > Black is already two pawns up.

click for larger view

Your line <15...Nfd5! 16.Qe4 Qg5+ 17.Qg4 Qh6 18.h4 Rxc4> is , too, but only one pawn up.

click for larger view

Sep-18-08  Tacticstudent: It's very interesting to see <<Tarrasch x Nimzowitsch>>, because their ideas about chess were completely different and they were often talking bad about each other's way to look at chess. This game is for sure special, because it shows Nimzowitsch winning Tarrasch, but using his <opponent's> ideas! Quite fantastic.
May-04-18  pawnpro: nimzo....when he was young..showing much skill..
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
g67 hanging pawns
from Nimzovich: Chess Praxis by setuhanu01
from Middlegame Strategy by Patca63
A00 D40 QGD: Semi-Tarrasch [Black]
by chess.master
51b Middlegames - White's Hanging Pawns
by Baby Hawk
The Super Grandmaster Touch
by AuDo
Hamburg GER 1910 (Nimzo wins with Black)
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by wanabe2000
Game 67
from Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by StoppedClock
Legend Nimzowitt
by Gottschalk
Nimzo Uses the Tarrsch Defense against Tarrsch!
from Rivals: Tarrsch vs. Nimzo by numbknight
from Middlegame Strategy by jakaiden
29...Rcg8 (36.Rxg6+, 39...Nxe3+, 43...f5+ and 51.fxe5+).
from Olga chokes on by Chessdreamer
zz30_B:N - Realise their magic relationship
by whiteshark
from Middlegame Strategy by Del ToRo
51b Middlegames - White's Hanging Pawns
by whiteshark
Game 67
from Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Baby Hawk
Game 67
from Chess Praxis (Nimzowitsch) by Qindarka

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC