chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Amos Burn vs John Owen
Liverpool (1884), Liverpool ENG, Feb-07
Zukertort Opening: Queen's Gambit Invitation (A04)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Burn/Owen games
sac: 19.f3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-26-04  morphynoman2: Why not 19... Rf6 in stead of the unsound 19... Bxf1? Then 20. Qxg2 (20. Rf2?? Qh1) Rg6, and I think black has at least a draw.
Mar-27-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  akiba82: morphynoman2: after your suggestion White would still have rook and two bishops for the queen- too much. As in the game continuation, the two bishops decide.
Sep-21-04  clocked: 19...Bxf1 is sound. Black had many opportunites to keep the advantage or force a draw
Sep-21-04  InspiredByMorphy: <clocked> Could black have gotten away with 19. ...Rf6 in hopes of placing the rook on g6? White cant play 20.Rf2 because of 20. ...Qh1# If 20.e4 Rg6 21.exf5 Rg3 What can white do in response to 19. ...Rf6 ?
Sep-21-04  acirce: <What can white do in response to 19. ...Rf6 ?> Simply 20.Qxg2 Rg6 21.Qxg6 leads to approximate material equality but where White should be better because Black's remaining rook is out of play.
Sep-21-04  percyblakeney: My Fritz gives white a slight edge, valued less than half a pawn, after the 19. Rf6 continuation. In any case 27. Rd1+ ought to draw.
Apr-28-05  PizzatheHut: I clicked on a link that read 'Double Bishop Sacrifices' and was brought to this game. I wasn't expecting the sacrificer to lose! :)
Apr-28-05  mr. nice guy: <PizzatheHut> If the sacrificer lost does that mean that the sacrificee won?
Apr-28-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Simply 27...Rd1+ 28.Kf2 Qd2+ looks like a perpetual to moi
Jun-30-05  lentil: i agree with calli
Jun-30-05  Granite: This is an excellent example of how two minor pieces - especially the bishop pair - are greater then a rook. looking at the position after 29. f4 black is up two pawns and white's king looks looser, but truth be told it's white with all the threats. The two bishops slice the entire board in half, his rook and queen are well placed and black's rook is akward on h5 - wouldn't it be great to smash the bishop on e5 with that bad rook and look for mate?

Unfortunately, this exchange would mean black is now down a minor piece and this means he'd better have serious threats. Suddenly the threat of sacing the exchange and consolidating black's pawn advantage aren't there. From here the task comes to defense and we can see clearly how white was able to control the entire situation and attack black's king. I'm guessing Owen overestimated his chances and didn't look for an accurate defense.

Nov-26-05  Kwesi: What happens if 18...Bf3 ?
Nov-26-05  percyblakeney: <Kwesi> Good question, I think you've found a winning move there...
Nov-27-05  percyblakeney: Forster annotates this game in his book on Burn and mentions the similar and more famous Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 but only gives 16. ... Bxh2+ a "!?" since he hasn't found 18. ... Bf3, which Shredder confirms is winning. If white takes the bishop he'll be mated soon after Qg5+ and Rf6, a move like Rd1 fails because of Rf6, and Be2 will be met by Bxg2. In the latter line f3 doesn't work because of Qg3.

A possible continuation: 18. ... Bf3 19. Be2 Bxg2 20. f3 Qg3 21. Rf2 Bh3+ 22. Kh1 Qxf2 and black is winning. If white instead tries 20. Kxg2 in this line black plays Qg5+ and after 21. Kh1 Rf6 it will cost white too much material to prevent the mate. Shredder's choice after 18. ... Bf3 is to sacrifice the queen with 19. Qd1, after which it evaluates the position as more than 5 pawns up for black.

Mar-01-06  LIFE Master AJ: Hmmm, Black sacked the 2 B's ... but lost horribly. Am I missing something?
May-01-06  technical draw: Is AJ missing something?. Don't answer, it sounds like a trap.
Aug-31-06  Kwesi: 18...Bf3!!
Oct-02-06  syracrophy: After 19...♗xf1? 20.♗xf1 Black's already in disadvantage. White's pair of bishops and now that the white king can be protected give White the advantage.

It's a pity that the one that played (for first time!) the double-bishop sacrifice missed the winning 18...♗f3!! <19.gxf3 ♕g5+ 20.♔h1 ♖f6! and curtain's down>

Feb-08-07  who: Well yes, but if had played the correct Bf3 it wouldn't be the what's normally meant by "the double bishop sac."
Jan-25-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: So, in the view of the stunnig 18...Bf3!!, it seems that White <16.bxc3?. was potentially loosing error. Had White played 16.Bxc4, the combo would probably not have worked.

<... 16.Bxc4 Bxh2+ 17.Kxh2 Qh4+ 18.Kg1 Bf3 19.Bxe6+ Kh8 20.Bxf5...> and Bh3 should let the rest of air from the Black attack. (The 16.Bxc4 looks good also on positional grounds.)

Btw, pitty that Owen did not notice the <18...Bf3!!>, OTB moves like that confirm chess immortality.

Dec-30-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Miles would get it right, 101 years later, in E Dizdarevic vs Miles, 1985. After <13.Nxc4>:


click for larger view

The position is much the same as after 16.bxc4 in this game, and Miles got it right with 16...Bxh2+ 17.Kxh2 Qh4+ 18.Kg1 Bf3!

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Zukertort Opening: QG Invitation (A04) 1-0 Dbl B sac gone wrong
from yDiagonals Attack: Bs Highway, Battery, Crossfir by fredthebear
Reverend John Owen plays ...b6
by rudiv
failed prequel to lasker's combination
from kladist's classics by kladist
Reverend John Owen plays ...b6
by rudiv
Zukertort Opening: QG Invitation (A04) 1-0 Dbl B sac gone wrong
from Black Double Fianchettos In Process Fredthebear by fredthebear
The Ur-Original!
from 70e_Double Bishop Sacrifices by whiteshark
castillov's doble bihshop sac
by castillov
double B sac fails? repair with echo double B sac theme!
from chess strategems ii - under construction by gauer
18. ... Bf3 would have won instead of the classic 18. ... Bxg2
from Double Bishop sacrifices by Stelling
Colle-Zukertort, QG Invitation (A04) 1-0 Dbl B sac gone wrong
from Zuke/Rubinstein Power b3, Bb2 by yiotta
The first double bishop sacrifice was loss
from Gottschalk's favorite games by Gottschalk
opening
by ipap
Colle-Zukertort, QG Invitation (A04) 1-0 Dbl B sac gone wrong
from Zukertort/Rubinstein Powered Fredthebear by resipsa
lucianop's favorite games
by lucianop
Amos Burn (1848-1925)
from Player of the day: notable game IV by nikolaas
1884: The original double bishop sac gone wrong
from The Game Of The Year (1851 - ) by TheAlchemist


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC