chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Claude Frizzel Bloodgood vs R Lewis
"A Captive Audience" (game of the day Sep-19-2006)
Norfolk, VA (1961)
Grob Opening: Grob Gambit. Declined (A00)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

find similar games 62 more games of C Bloodgood
sac: 38.Nf6+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-23-05  ughaibu: RookFile: have a look at Chessbase' Bloodgood collection, he was also fond of 1.d4 Nf6 2.g4 (recently mentioned by Sneaky).
Sep-23-05  RookFile: Oh, I kind of remember that, we used to fool around with that sometimes in Boston. The idea is 2... Nxg4 3. e4 But I think that one is more dubious that 1. g4.

I'm actually quite fond of Bisquier's
idea: 1. Nf3 d5 2. b3 c5 3. e4 dxe4
4. Ne5 This the Budapest Gambit, with
an extra tempo. (It also sets a trap,
turns out that after ....Qd4 white
can calmly play 5. Bb2, if Qxb2, after 6. Nc3
white ends up trapping the black queen.)

Sep-23-05  THE pawn: That was a bloody good game!
Dec-19-05  Darknite: 15..Nxb2? 15..Bf7 first and then Nxb2 with tempo and white is toast.

Dec-19-05  Darknite: Not to mention, as in the notation, what is up with 13..Nc5?? What is going on in this game!!!
Dec-19-05  Averageguy: <Darknite> 13...Nc5 attacks the queen and defends the b7 pawn.
Dec-20-05  Darknite: <averageguy> it also just loses the piece. 14. Nxc5 and now what?
Dec-20-05  Averageguy: <Darknite> Whoops, I missed the obvious. Sorry :-(
Dec-20-05  Darknite: <Averageguy> dont worry about it - so did Charles Frizzel
Mar-20-06  SvenBartels: <RookFile> Hm, I am not so sure about your trap: 1. Nf3 d5 2. b3 c5 3. e4 dxe4 4. Ne5 Qd4 5. Bb2 Qxb2 6. Nc3 Nc6! 7. Nc4 Bg4! Black seems to be doing ok
Sep-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: The best thing about this game is the very enjoyable biography of the guy playing White.
Sep-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: After 13...Nc5??, Bloodgood overlooks 14. Nxc5 immediately winning a piece and the game.

Lewis misses the more subtle possibility 15...Bf7! 16. Qa4 Nxb2 17. Qc2 Nc4 when Black has the extra pawn and all the play against a cramped White position.

Lewis went wrong earlier with 9...dxe4?, allowing White a good game after 9. dxe4 . Instead 9...Ne7! maintains the tension with a clear advantage for Black.

Sep-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Seems to me there's nothing wrong with 2...Bxg4 to , when Black can give back the pawn for superior development as in W Loch vs B Knorr, 1989 or B Wall vs John Wong, 1986 ( a drawn game where Black missed a quick win on move 8).
Sep-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: A couple of interesting correspondence games in this opening are Grob vs R Bucher, 1966 and Grob vs Lenherr, 1966.
Sep-19-06  mshah28: Can someone tell me why White did not move 14. Nxc5? It seems too obvious!
Sep-19-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: I guess this was a case of "double chess blindness" Black made a move that gave a piece away and white missed its capture.

This game shows a minor flaw in the OPENING EXPLORER technology. Since a majority of the games on the base involving the opening move of 1 g4,were played by Mr. Bloodgood against far weaker competition,the numbers are skewed in favor of the opening. At least in this special case,the numbers are NOT accurate-because best play is not involved.

Sep-19-06  Chess Classics: <kevin86> Opening statistics hardly mean anything until you get to 2200+ level, if you ask me.

Regards,
CC

Sep-19-06  Maatalkko: <RookFile> Is right, Bloodgood wasn't really a 2700 strength player. The reason he had such a high rating was because he played most (maybe all) of his games while incarcerated for killing his mother.

I read about him in an excellent travelogue called "The Chess Artist", by JC Hallman. Hallman and Glenn Umstead, an African-American master who is the subject of most of the book, visited Bloodgood in prison. Bloodgood was an interesting person, in a decidedly sinister way, but going into all of it is off topic.

One of Bloodgood's gripes was the rating system for tournaments played in the prison, which was out of whack. Nearly every competent player in jail was 2400+ because of hyperinflation due to a cause I have forgotten. Bloodgood had written to the USCF about the problem, but in his own words "Nobody gave a dang."

I highly recommend "The Chess Artist" to everyone interested. I think it is available in most libraries and many bookstores.

Bloodgood played many correspondence games while in jail, hundreds at a time. He may have been a 2700 correspondence player, but I doubt it though. In a correspondence game against Hallman he "hung a piece", although Hallman confessed he was using a computer. Bloodgood was dying when interviewed, but claimed he played at about 2000 strength at the time.

Sep-19-06  strelec: <SvenBartels> What would you suggest after 1. ♘f3 d5 2. b3 c5 3. e4 dxe4 4. ♘e5 ♕d4 5. ♗b2 ♕xb2 6. ♘c3 ♘c6 7. ♘c4 ♗g4 8. ♗e2 ? It seems to me that white is doing ok. I do agree with your conclusion though as after 6... ♕a3 7. ♘c4 ♕a6 I don't see enough compensation for white.
Sep-19-06  Chessire Cat: I'm sorry, but how that game can get into a "beautiful games" anthology after that atrocious blunder on move 14 is really beyond me! Is that notation really correct? That's the sort of thing kibbitzers would laugh at in 1-minute speed chess, and in a grandmaster tournament it's totally incomprehensible.
Sep-19-06  LivBlockade: <Maatalkko ...played most (maybe all) of his games while incarcerated> Thanks - That explains why the game-of-the-day title is 'A Captive Audience'.
Sep-19-06  CrystalFrost: Is eveybody here trying to say that a 2700 rated Grandmaster misses capturing a knight when it is offering itself without any compenstion or cost.
Sep-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <CrystalFrost> The suggestion is Bloodgood's 2700 rating was gossly inflated and that his actual playing strength was far below this official USCF rating. However, from what I've seen of Bloodgood's games, this blunder was atypical of his usual stronger play. He was probably at least a strong expert in his prime.
Sep-20-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: I'm issuing a challenge for all of you to find me one WC who hasn't blundered in any of his games. Make it even any GM with enough games in this database, if you want.

Of course, the burden would be on me, since you would claim that a particular GM never blundered and then I'd have to find a game in which he blundered. So this would be ridiculous. But the point should be clear -- everyone messes up. What makes great players great is that they mess up much less often (and they sometimes even almost come back and win -- if anyone remembers Capa giving up a knight early on in one game, but playing on and fighting strong... before losing).

Jan-23-10  waustad: One problem with looking at the opening explorer is that for some offbeat openings, many of the games are by somebody like Bloodgood or Diemer against nobody in particular. Interesting, but not a good judge of the actual value of the opening.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
JP G4
by Firelight
September 19: A Captive Audience
from Game of the Day 2006 by Phony Benoni
Beautiful games!!!
by Tamerlan
Grob Opening: Grob Gambit. Declined
from GAMES OF THE DAY by gambitfan
A Lot Can Happen On 64 Squares
by wandererofmars
Played in captivity...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 5 by xajik
Grob Opening: Grob Gambit. Declined
from UNCOMMON OPENINGS by gambitfan
Played in captivity...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 5 by Trigonometrist
Pouyan's favorite games
by calidoggg
Grob Gambit. Declined 3.g5 (A00) 1-0 Nifty N work to the rescue
from Groaners Grabbed Fredthebear by fredthebear
Game of the Sep-19-06
from Games of the day 4 by Herkus
1 G4!!
by Cshatranj
Game of the Days
by hidude
Played in captivity...(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 5 by kishchess


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC