chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Edward Lasker
"Drawing Conclusions" (game of the day Jun-02-2015)
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 6, Mar-23
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Chigorin Defense Panov System (C99)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more Lasker/Ed. Lasker game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Olga is our default viewer, but we offer other choices as well. You can use a different viewer by selecting it from the pulldown menu below and pressing the "Set" button.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-02-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Everett> No such collection would be complete without this scrap.
Mar-02-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Wolfgang Heidenfeld did complile such a book, translated into English with the imagainative title, <Draw>. However, one of his standards was to exclude games where either player was clearly winning at some point, which eliminated this game.

He did include Schlechter vs Lasker, 1910, and with a sense of awe. At the end, his comment was something like, <"And yet there are people who claim that Karpov and Korchnoi are stronger than Lasker and Schlechter. They must be joking.">

A very interesting book, if you can find it.

Mar-02-14  Everett: Thank you <PH>

Yeah, that Schlecter-Lasker game is ridiculous. Combine that with this game, and we see great play, original play, accurate and imaginative play, by past masters who had no had Steinitz, Morphy and Andersson, but few other shoulders upon which to stand. Makes me think they (especially Lasker and Capablanca) would understand modern chess the second they saw it.

Feb-15-15  mikealando: WOw. Beautiful chess. All out attack and defense.
Feb-15-15  JimNorCal: My local library had the "Draw" book but it never seemed to be on the shelves. Eventually I found it misfiled in the Art section.
Apr-30-15  Howard: Yes, I'm fairly familiar with that Draw! book. The author died before he could finish it, so John Nunn completed the book and had it published.
Apr-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <Howard: Yes, I'm fairly familiar with that Draw! book. The author died before he could finish it, so John Nunn completed the book and had it published.>

So it was Nunn who had it published! Good old Nunn! The book would never have seen the light of day without him! Well done Dr Nunn!

Jun-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I'm glad to see this game finally get its due. You can make a strong case for it being the most interesting 100+ move game ever.

If you've never seen it, please stick with it. It's a unbelievable fight, and you will not believe the ending.

<offramp> <Howard> "Draw!" was originally published as "Grosse Remispartien" in 1968. Nunn's edited and expanded a translation, making some changes in the game selection in line with Heidernfeld's own criteria.

Jun-02-15  JimNorCal: Game of the day!
Excellent choice.
Jun-02-15  paramount: Finally, after almost 2 years since the last post here that I hope this game to be GOTD, the panel finally realize that this game DESERVES.

HUFFFF!!

Jun-02-15  SeanAzarin: I'm glad this game is finally GOTD. They didn't use my pun (The Drawing Laskers), but who cares? This game has deserved to be recognized for a long time. I have a copy of Edward Lasker's book where he spends 30 pages analyzing the game.

The game, complete with Edward Lasker's annotations, is here:

http://gameknot.com/annotation.pl/t...

Jun-02-15  SeanAzarin: Edward Lasker on his 77th move:

"Had I realized that White had a chance to draw, I would have looked much more into the variations arising from 77... P-N6. I only figured ahead as far as 78 N-B4 K-N4 79 N-N2 KxP 80 K-K3 K-N4 81 P-N5 K-N5 82 P-N6 K-B6 83 N-R4 K-B7 84 P-B5. I analyzed it again after the game and concluded Black could win if he attacks the Knight [which keeps his Pawn from advancing] with R-QR sq. after first getting White's King to the 4th rank so the Knight is captured with check. This led me to claim that after 84 P-B5, 84 R-K sq ch 85 K-B3 R-KB sq would seal White's fate. If after 86 K-B4 R-QR sq White plays 87 N-N6 he does not get a Queen at all. But White need not play 86 K-B4: he can draw with 86 P-N7! RxP ch 87 K-N4 R-B8 89 K-N5, winning the Rook in the end."

And on his 92th move:

"It would take White 3 more moves, I had calculated, to capture the Pawn: K-R3, N-B5 and NxP. But at that moment my King would reach the square QB5 and the Knight would be lost because the Rook pins it! It never occurred to me that White need not capture the Pawn at all and could still draw the game. Emanuel Lasker actually discovered a new end-game position in which a R and P cannot win against a Knight, and this position has since become a classic."

Jun-02-15  morfishine: Lasker was beside himself
Jun-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: It always seemed to me that Em. Lasker was the great explorer of chess, who kept venturing into bizarre and impenetrable wildernesses. Games like Lasker vs W Napier, 1904, as well as the Schlechter game mentioned earlier in the thread, look like no games played before and very few ever since.
Jun-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: < Phony Benoni: Wolfgang Heidenfeld did complile such a book, translated into English with the imagainative title, <Draw>. However, one of his standards was to exclude games where either player was clearly winning at some point, which eliminated this game. He did include Schlechter vs Lasker, 1910, and with a sense of awe. At the end, his comment was something like, <"And yet there are people who claim that Karpov and Korchnoi are stronger than Lasker and Schlechter. They must be joking.">

A very interesting book, if you can find it.>

I've seen that book it's in the library of my club, might look at it, some of the great games have been a draw. When was anyone winning in this game?!

It seemed a great struggle to me. Albeit between nephew and uncle I think the relationship was. Both wrote good chess books which I studied when I started chess in the early 60s. In fact I sometimes study Lasker's Manual of chess, it is still worth a good look...

Jun-02-15  mruknowwho: Battle of the Laskers.
Jun-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White was able to draw because black cannot penetrate and separate the knight from the pawn or force the pawn through. Therefore, a draw.One of my favorite games- ever!
Jun-02-15  belgradegambit: I had just submitted "Five Easy Pieces" as a title for this GOTD. Good pun here though.
Jun-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I've often found that in any game of >100 moves there is a period or two when nothing happens. Often it's a load of manoeuvering before a pawn break, of near-repetitions in a queen or rook ending. But this game is action all the way, a real Sergio Leone.
Jun-03-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: < But this game is action all the way, a real Sergio Leone.>

"Once upon a time in New York"

Jun-04-15  Moszkowski012273: 30...Nxe4 looks like a much better line for black.
Jun-18-15  Cheapo by the Dozen: I like the part where the player with inferior material pushes hard to simplify (because the two knights clustered on the kingside couldn't get to the queenside as quickly as one rook could).
Nov-22-15  Howard: Where can one find engine analysis on this fascinating ending ?

Exactly where did Edward Lasker miss a forced win ?

Dec-03-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Great game. Lots of thrust and parry right from the get go, and the action never let's up.
Dec-05-19  talfan: Edward Lasker analysis this in great detail in his Chess for Fun and Chess for Blood book. I started reading it today, and it seems excellent.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Game 73
from World Champion - Lasker (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
Rook + pawn vs. knight + 2 pawns
from Instructive chess endgames I by Jaredfchess
K+N draws K+R+P
from Surprising Endgames by OBIT
Lone knight holds off a rook and pawn
from Exceptions to the "rules" by Gregor Samsa Mendel
fortress!
from chess strategems vii - under construction by gauer
Game #65
from John Nunn's Chess Course by Incremental
Game 70
from number 1 by Frodo7
Mikhail Shereshevsky's Endgame Strategy
by Inlandmoon
Game #65
from John Nunn's Chess Course by vantheanh
Chapter 2 (Black to play, move 72)
from Shereshevsky's Endgame Strategy by hms123
Game 70
from Garry Kasparov on My Great Predecessors Part 1 by MetalPlastic
72. ...Rh8
from Endgames for Pure Pleasure by Timothy Glenn Forney
Draws!: Stories of awe, bizarre and ingenuity
by syracrophy
Round 6 March 23rd
from New York 1924 - Alekhine by vantheanh
July / August, p. 137 [Game 112 / 4574]
from American Chess Bulletin 1924 by Phony Benoni
Game 70
from On My Great Predecessors 1 (Kasparov) by Qindarka
justwatcher's favorite games
by justwatcher
How to defend when the exchange down. N draws against R + P!
from One Hundred and One Great Endgames by Nasruddin Hodja
keypusher's bookmarked games
by keypusher
plus 53 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC