chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexey Shirov vs Teimour Radjabov
Linares (2004), Linares ESP, rd 6, Feb-25
King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation. Bayonet Attack Sokolov's Line (E97)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 11 times; par: 104 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 24 more Shirov/Radjabov games
sac: 19.Rxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can step through the moves by clicking the < and > buttons, but it's much easier to simply use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-25-04  Benjamin Lau: Lol ;)
Feb-25-04  Bustamove: I am not strong enuf to analyze so someone might help me out. Is this game one of the best of 2004, or is this game an example of what one should expect when one opponent is less experienced and ranked 100 points lower?
Feb-25-04  ChessPraxis: <Bustamove> This game was just played today at Linares - an annual super-tournament. The games from Linares get published each day and generate a lot of interest - this one especially since it wasn't a draw while most of the games at this tournament so far this year have been draws.
Feb-25-04  Bustamove: <chesspraxis> Thx for the response. I actually watched the game today while pretending to work. I was left wondering if my enjoyment was because it was not a draw or if it was a special game period. I enjoyed it immensely, but for all I know it is filled with errors. Any initial opinions?
Feb-25-04  mymt: thanks crafty & ajit, only asked because Radjabov later plays...Qxb4.the invasion via the a1-h8 daiagonal seemedthe likely reason for avioding ...Qxe6 [sorry about the misprint ...Qxe5 ]
Feb-26-04  ksadler: is there anything better than 33. ... Rxe6 34.Qxe7 Rxe7 35.Rxe7? am i missing something simple? yes it's still likely a lost endgame, but so was the one radjabov went into ;)
Feb-26-04  ughaibu: Is 13....h6 a known move? It seems to me that his troubles came from that.
Feb-26-04  drukenknight: why the criticism of the exchange sack? let's see he has a passed pawn on the 6th rank already, and he gets a B/P for the Rook and some attacking chances. What could be a better bargain than that? I wonder what other players think they expect to see before they will make a sack.
Feb-26-04  Shadout Mapes: 33. ... Rxe6 34.Qh5+ Kf6 (forced) 35.Rf5+ Kg7 36.Rg5+ Qxg5 37.Qxg5+ and the ending will be similar to the game. Unless there's something better?
Feb-26-04  731: I was following the progress of this game in an internet café yesterday, I had to leave around move 31/32... Today I was eager to find out the result... I'm impressed that Shirov won!

At least there's someone in Linares showing us how to value pieces for what they truly are.

Feb-26-04  Tigran Petrosian: Is there a site that has this game annotated?
Feb-27-04  chessfected: A picturesque finish would be 66...Kg8 67.f7+ Kf8 68. Qh8+ Ke7 69. Qf6+ Kf8 70. Qg7+ Ke7 71.f8Q+ when White makes a second queen with a double check from both queens!:)
Feb-28-04  731: 19. Rxe5 is just opening theory right?
Apr-20-05  DragonKeeper: Well i havent see much games of Shirov, but i like the way this guy plays:great game.
Jan-06-07  aazqua: This guy with the rooks completely botched this game.
Jun-03-07  MarvinTsai: When your king is dangerous, you lose all the initiatives!
Feb-28-08  mannetje: This is what Joe Gallagher has to say about the Bayonet attack (9.b4): (2004)

<Over the last 8 or 9 years the Bayonet Attack has been one of White's main success stories in the King's Indian. Prior to this 9.b4 was generally thought to be a poor relation to the main alternatives in this position, 9.Ne1 and 9.Nd2. It was rarely seen in top class chess. Strange, you may think, as 9.b4 is the obvious way for White to force through c5-c5 as quickly as possible. In this position the pawn structure dictates that White will attack on the queenside. The reason why this move was not trusted was that it allowed Black to play the active 9...Nh5, whilst after moves like 9.Nd2 or 9.Ne1 the black knight, in order to get of of the way of the f-pawn, would have to retreat. Attitudes began to change after White discovered the move 10.Re1 (in reply to 9...Nh5). The simple idea is to meet 10...Nf4 with 11.Bf1. The bishop on f1 is very well placed defensively and it turn out, that despite his active appearance, that the knight on f4 is quite poorly placed. There is nothing for it to attack and it can even get in the way of blacks kingside play. For example, the traditional pawn storm with ...f5-f4 is not possible with the knight on f4 and black will also have to be constantly on the lookout for white playing Bxf4 at a favourable moment. It took a while, and cost an awful lot of points, before black players appreciated this. Meanwhile everyone was playing 9.b4. The old main lines, 9.Ne1 and 9.Nd2, just disappeared. Even Gary Kasparov got his fingers burned and the Bayonet Attack was the main reason for his recent loss of confidence in the King's Indian (he didn't play it once in his world title match with Kramnik, who happens to be one of the main advocates of 9.b4). Many other King's Indian specialists, such as myself, settled for giving up 7...Nc6. A whole new system with 7...Na6 was born almost solely due to White's successes in the Bayonet Attack.>

<However, the tide finally appears to be turning. The main problem for black was not the strength of the Bayonet Attack, but the fact that he was playing to ambitiously. The King's Indian attracts players who are looking for a sharp struggle. Instead of trying to prove equality they were trying to destroy the Bayonet Attack. They didn't realise that the best way to destroy the Bayonet Attack was to prove equality! Once equality has been established white players are bound to turn there attention elsewhere. And that is exactly what has happened over the last two or three years. We now see a lot less of the Bayonet Attack and a lot more of the other variations of the King's Indian. We are also seeing less of 7...Na6 as players such as myself are returning to the heart and soul of the King's Indian, 7...Nc6.>

Feb-28-08  mannetje: Gallagher:
<According to Shirov 33...Qxe6 is the only real mistake of the game. Instead 33...Rxe6! 34.Qh5+ Kg7 35.Rg5+ Qxg5 should eventually lead to a position where White can make no progress. All I can say is that if black is equal in this line it is a lucky equality.>

<On the available evidence, 17...Nf5 looks less risky. Dautov-Kindermann, Nussloch 1996 continued 18.b5 <White must soften up the black queenside otherwise he might lose his e6 pawn for nothing> 18...Rc8 19.Re2 Re8 20.bxc6 bxc6 21.c5 <the only real alternative for white was to try Qd1-a4 on one of the last few moves> 21...d5 22.Bxe5 Bxe5 23.Rxe5 Qf6 24.Re1 1/2-1/2. The game seems about equal but of course Shirov may have a thing or two to say in the future about this line>

Feb-12-09  falso contacto: way to go shirov!!!
Aug-09-09  shakespeare: this is an interesting variation in the bayonet attack - the exchange sac Rxe5 - opening the e file - I never saw this normally somehow desperately looking e6 pawn getting so strong like in this game
Nov-11-10  sevenseaman: At least the game showed me the handling of two Rs against a Q with couple of connected pawns. Its a plus.
Nov-11-10  Blunderdome: Radja would get revenge three years later.
Dec-27-11  cocker: Ending after 34 ... Rxe6 is discussed in UCE by John Nunn, p 206,
Aug-07-16  Virgil A: 66...Kg8
67.f7+
Bravo! Shirov!

Shir ov Chess

Aug-11-18  Whitehat1963: What’s best play after 32...Be4+?
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
KID: Orthodox Variation. Bayonet Attack Sokolov's Line
from MKD's KID by MKD
Game 47
from Fire on Board 2 (Shirov) by isfsam
Linares 2004
from # Greatest Tournaments 2004 by Qindarka
zengames ll
by zentovic
Temp
from Games that are of current interest to me. by themadhair
Game collection: 101
by cgrob
Shirov breaks the draw-spell in style (10th place, 6 points)
from 2004's Greatest Chess Games by iron maiden
Digest Games
by npchess
instructive ending
by caracas1970
bwmate's favorite games
by bwmate
9.b4 Nh5 10.Re1 f5 11.Ng5 Nf6 12.Bf3 c6 13.Bb2 h6
from King's Indian by KingG
Q+2p vs. 2R
from Endgame technique by Patca63
A. Shirov - My Best Games In The Kings Indian
by Pyke
Instructive endgame Q+2p vs 2R
from farrooj's bookmarked by farrooj
Shirov brings excitement back to Linares
from Iron Maiden's favorites album by iron maiden
Bayonet attack; Rook sac on the e file
from King's Indian by freeman8201
ajedrez de elite
by afabian
White wins - interesting variation of the bayonett
from KID for black by shakespeare
Chapter 1: Kings Indian (Game 1)
from Starting out: 1 d4! by Chess4Him
Q+2p vs. 2R
from Endgame technique by zorro
plus 32 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC