Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Vladimir Kramnik
Corus Group A (2001), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 5, Jan-18
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense. l'Hermet Variation Berlin Wall Defense (C67)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 121 more Kasparov/Kramnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-23-06  KingG: 25.g4!, would have given White a big advantage. The point is 25...hxg3+? 26.Nxg3 Rxh3 27.Rxd4 Rxd4 28.Nf5+
Sep-22-06  positionalgenius: this is a high quality draw,and Kramnik's play is quite instructive.Still as <kingG>stated g4! was a good move that Kasparov missed.
Sep-22-06  euripides: White can try to win at the end by 47.Kd4 Kxe7 48.Kd5 g6 49.Ke5. Now White has the vertical opposition. But Black can convert it into a drawing horizontal opposition with 49... Kf7 50. Kd6 Kf6 or even 50...g5.
Sep-22-06  positionalgenius: <euripides>Thanks for the analysis.
Sep-22-06  Tenderfoot: 44...Re3+ Was pretty good, making the trade one rank down and allowing for 46...f5 which protects the pawn on h4. A nice endgame.
Apr-29-07  notyetagm: <KingG: 25.g4!, would have given White a big advantage. The point is 25...hxg3+? 26.Nxg3 Rxh3 27.Rxd4 Rxd4 28.Nf5+>

Yes, Kasparov missed a great opportunity to stick his great rival Kramnik with a loss in this game.

Position after 24 ... ♖h8-h5?!:

click for larger view

Here Kasparov (White) wanted to play 25 g2-g4! for the <STRATEGICALLY> desirable reason of advancing his healthy kingside 4-3 pawn majority. But Kasparov thought that Black would simply take en passant after 25 g2-g4! h4xg3? 26 ♘e4xg3.

(VAR) Position after 25 g2-g4! h4xg3? 26 ♘e4xg3:

click for larger view

But here the great tactician Kasparov missed the importance of the <KNIGHT OPPOSITION> Black d4-knight vs White g3-knight. Wherever Kramnik (Black) moves his threatened h5-rook, say 26 ... ♖h5xh3, Kasparov simply plays 27 ♖d1x♘d4! <REMOVE THE GUARD>

(VAR) Position after 26 ... ♖h5xh3 27 ♖d1x♘d4!:

click for larger view

and White wins material no matter what Black does:

27 ... ♖d8x♖d4 28 ♘g3-f5+ and 29 ♘f5x♖d4
27 ... ♖h3x♘g3 29 ♖d4x♖d8

So it turns out that Kramnik (Black) -cannot- take the White g4-pawn en passant after 25 g2-g4! because of <TACTICS> and he must allows Kasparov (White) to play this <STRATEGICALLY> desirable pawn advance, yielding Kasparov a large advantage.

This is one of the best examples I have ever seen on the interplay between <STRATEGY> and <TACTICS>. <TACTICS> allow Kasparov to play the <STRATEGICALLY> desirable 25 g2-g4! advance even though this move does not look possible at first glance.

May-09-08  acirce: Both players seemed to miss 25.g4 even in analysis afterwards, or at least it's not mentioned in the report. But even later Kasparov had good winning chances - had he played 40.f5! he assessed his chance to win to 70% and Kramnik agreed it would have been hard to save.
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: "As expected, we played the Berlin Defense. It was successfully employed (four times!) by Kramnik during the World Championship match in London. To find a way to win here is a question of principle now."

-- Garry Kasparov (on facing Kramnik and the Berlin Defense at Corus)

Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: 34 ... f6?

"This is a blunder. Correct is 34 ... bxc5. Then, according to Yury Dokhoian, Kasparov's second, 35. Ra4 c4 36. Ke3 c5 37. Kd2 Kxf4 38. Kc3 Kxe5 39. Kxc4 Kd6 40. Kb5 Ra8 41. a6 Rb8+ 42. Ka5 (42. Kc4 Kc6 is equal) Kc6 43. a7 Rb5+ 44. Ka6 Rb6+ 45. Ka5 Rb5+ draws. Also, 35. Ke3 c4 36. Kd4 Kxf4 37. Rf3+ Kg5 38. Rxf7 Rxa5 39. Rxg7+ Kf5 40. Rf7+ Ke6 41. Rf6+ Ke7 42. Rf2 Rd5+ 43. Kxc4 Rxe5 heads toward a draw."

40. Rxc6?

"Returning blunder for blunder, Kasparov let Kramnik off with an easy draw. Correct is 40. f5!, and if 40 ... Rxe7, then 41. Rxc6 bxc5 42. a5 Re5 43. Rxc7+ Kg8 44. a6 Rxf5+ 45. Kg4 and Black must resign because he cannot get his rook back to stop the a-pawn. In this line, 41 ... Kg8 42. cxb6 cxb6 43. Rxb6 Ra7 44. Rb4 Ra5 45. Kg4 Rd5 46. Rb2 Rd4+ 47. Kh5 Rxa4 48. Kg6 Ra8 49. Rb7 Kh8 50. Rb4 Kg8 51. Rxh4 Ra2 52. g4 Ra7 53. Rh7 Rb7 54. h4 Rb4 55. g5 fxg5 56. Rxg7+ Kh8 57. Re7! (and not 57. hxg5 Ra6+ 58. f6 Rxf6!) Rb8 58. hxg5 also wins for White. Moreover, 41 ... g6 42. cxb6 cxb6 43. Rxb6 gxf5 44. Rb4 will win for White."

40 ... Ra8!

"Kasparov admitted to having underestimated this move."

Robert Byrne, "65th Square: A Comeback?"

"Chess Life" May 2001

Aug-13-11  keithbc: what is wrong with just taking Kasparov's a pawn on move 34...Rxa5? This possibility is not mentioned in mags I have read on this game!
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: A few months earlier in their World Championship match Kramnik had played 9..Bd7 twice and 9..h6 twice and had never been in danger of losing; here he varied with 9..Ke8. 10..Be7 had been played once previously in Van den Doel-Miles Groningen 1997 won by Black (not included in this database); in that game Black had played 11..Bb4. Normally Black would be expected to try and hold on to his 2 bishops; Kramnik's strategy here was unorthodox. Kramnik's 14..Ne7 has not been repeated; in 4 subsequent games Black has played 14..Ke7. Taking the pawn with 18..Bxc2 19 f5..Nf8 20 Rf2..Bd3 21 Rd2 would have been strong for White.

<keithbc: what is wrong with just taking Kasparov's a pawn on move 34...Rxa5?>

Most King and pawn endings are lost for Black as Black cannot create a passed pawn om the queenside while Whiye can on the kingside. Karsten Mueller offered the following variation: 33..Rxa5? 34 Rxa5..bxa 35 c5..a4 36 a3..g6 37 g4+..hxg 38 Kxg3..g5 39 fxg..Kxg5 40 h4+..Kf5 41 h5..f5+ 42 Kg4 and White wins.

An excellent game which reminds one of how great Kramnik played in the WC match; he almost made as many errors in this game as in the entire match.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Black d4-knight vs White g3-knight makes f5 a tactical base
from Knight opposition + tactical target = knight for by notyetagm
Game 44
from Excelling at Chess (Aagaard) by howardb86
Berlin Def. l'Hermet Variation Berlin Wall Def (C67) 1/2-1/2
from DRAWS Collections Enlarged by Fredthebear by fredthebear
Corus Group A 2001
by Tabanus
Berlin Def. l'Hermet Variation Berlin Wall Def (C67) 1/2-1/2
from Vladi Kramn'd Fredthebear Full of White Russian by fredthebear
Kramnik with Berlin Wall by tesasembiring
by tesasembiring
Game 44
from Excelling at Chess (Aagaard) by Qindarka
Round Five, Game #34
from Wijk aan Zee Corus 2001 by Tabanus
parmetd's Kramnik view
by parmetd
by parmetd
Kramnik with Berlin Wall by tesasembiring
by alabama
Jeffrey A. Cajontoy's favorite games
by Jeffrey A. Cajontoy
Black d4-knight vs White g3-knight makes f5 a tactical base
from Knight opposition + tactical target = knight for by trh6upsz
Berlin Defence (C67)
from Opening e4: Ruy Lopez by arielbekarov
26 Ne4-g3 becomes dark-squared for fork of the d4-,e7-squares
senakash's favorite games ruylopez
by senakash

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC