Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Alexander Alekhine vs NN
"The Harem" (game of the day Aug-05-2006)
Moscow (1915) (probably analysis), Moscow RUE
French Defense: McCutcheon. Grigoriev Variation (C12)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 47 times; par: 44 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 15 more Alekhine/NN games
sac: 12.h5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-18-04  Calchexas: Here's a game for all of you with the "multiple queens" collections. 5 Queens!

Which brings up a question. If you have 3 queens on the board, one on a8, one on h8, and one on h1, and you want to move the Queen on h8 to a1, how do you give the notation for that? Qh8a1?

Apr-18-04  Kenkaku: <Calchexas> I think that your notation is correct, though if there were only one queen on the h file it would simply be Qha1 (which you probably already knew).
Apr-18-04  caseyclyde: There’s some interesting information regarding this game at Here are a few excerpts:

"The moves of this game were actually derived from game played between Alekhine and Grigoriev in Moscow in 1915. The game, as listed here, is a fake. It was never played. It is a pure concoction of Alekhine's. Exactly how Alekhine created this game alone makes an interesting story, unearthed for the first time by the American chess historian Dr. Buschke, in a series of articles in Chess Life in the early fifties. In the original game which this is derived from, Alekhine lost.

Alekhine - Grigoriev' one of the most successful hoaxes of chess history, there is also something else wrong with it. It is a case of mass suggestion. The beautiful move 24.Rh6 which has earned Alekhine countless exclamation marks, does not win."

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This game is incomplete!! Here is the proper conclusion: 24 ♖h6 ♕xf1
25 ♕b4+ ♕b5
26 ♕d8+ ♔a6
27 ♕(e3)a3+ ♕(c2)a4
28 ♕(a3)xa4 ♕xa4
29 ♕xa4*
Apr-18-04  ughaibu: How can a fabricated game have a "proper conclusion"?
Apr-19-04  caseyclyde: The line that kevin86 gives is quoted from Alekhine's book My Best Games of Chess 1908-1923. But it's still all fake.
Apr-19-04  Calchexas: Fake though it probably is, it's still very fun to watch.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: <ughaibu> Doen't a novel have a proper conclusion? I'm glad that the game was corrected. By all accounts,the game is a "fake". It sure was fun,though,wasn't it?
Apr-21-04  ughaibu: Kevin86: Yes, that's true (both).
Apr-23-04  austinpablo: I do believe that white could have ended it sooner with a queen(qf7-e7+) sacrifice on move 21 for the bishop on e7. What does anyone think of that!
Apr-23-04  vonKrolock: Yes, this game was composed by Alekhine, and used by him to ornament his Selected games... somewhere in a book by T. Krabbe I saw the score of the original Grigoriev-Alekhine, published in a Russian magazine around 1915... (the story related by Golombeck in the Alekhine - Book (or Böök) page (from Margate 1938) is another sample of the Alekhine fictionist's penchant...
Apr-23-04  Abecedarian: <vonKrolock> is that a "fictionist's penchant" or rather an auto-aggrandizist's confabulism? LOL.
Apr-23-04  Lawrence: <austinpablo>, welcome to the club! At first Junior 8 agrees with you but after about 10 minutes comes to the conclusion that AA played the right move, eval +1.07 versus +0.25 when either Queen takes the Bishop.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: As a small child,i memorized this game-after i found out that it was not a real game,but a composition by Alekhine,my opinion of the game was increased-after all,chess can be an art as well as a scientific game. Heck,even Bobby Fischer attempted to refine the game by changing the opening set-up to a random one.

To me,this game is the "Soup Nazi" of chess games-instead of-"NO SOUP FOR YOU"-it's "let's make another queen!"

Apr-23-04  Abecedarian: <kevin86>: Somehow the terms "nazi" and "Alekhine" always crop up in the same breath. Damn fine chess, though. And your point about the art of it all is well taken.
Apr-23-04  austinpablo: So since im new to this can anybody tell me where a good place to play chess online might be?
Apr-23-04  Minor Piece Activity: take a look at's FAQ...
Apr-23-04  vonKrolock: kevin86, Krabbe points out too that 24.Rh6 actually dont wins forcefully as AA, the author, believed, so, as a composition, its flawed anyway. And remains the question of ethics, too, the intention to swindle the public... (and off course he played so wonderfully concealed combinations in actual play that's hard to understand WHY he exposed himself toi this right criticism... is so... obscure...)
Apr-24-04  Zembla: Does anyone know why I don't see any version of this game in my Dover book - My Best Games 1908-1937?
Apr-24-04  WMD: Try game 26, Tarrasch vs Alekhine, in the first section of the book. The continuation is given in Alekhine's note on move 5.
Apr-25-04  Zembla: Thanks, WMD
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Did AA fake this game-or did someone else? You can't blame a person for another's "crime". It was published in Napier's book-PAUL MORPHY AND THE GOLDEN AGE OF CHESS-but the pedigrees of many games in the book were flawed-including one by Naper,himself (!)
Apr-30-04  ughaibu: Kevin86: Alekhine faked it, he published it in the notes to a game with Tarrasch in his first "best games" collection. He also famously faked a game with Tenner.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: <ughaibu> It sounds like AA meant it as "fiction" since it was his notes. It was however picked up by other sources-one being Napier-and published it as a "game". If it were a "fake",AA would have published it as a "game".

Second,to my regret,I found out that the Rh6 move did not win! (see caseyclyde,above)-too bad,it spoiled a good "story"

May-01-04  ughaibu: He said "a game played by the author", it was a fake, the post mortem analysis of a game in which Alekhine was black.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: ANALYSIS. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Cornwallis' favorite games
by Cornwallis
Alekhine's 5 queen game-hoax though it may be
from kevin86's favorite games by kevin86
JSYantiss' favorite games
by JSYantiss
5 Queens
from Random Stuff by GoodKnight
Many Queens
from JerseyDevil's favorite games by JerseyDevil
The 5 Queen game
from The Art of Sacrifice and Weirdness by tldr3
The famous faked five-queen game
from Bizarre games by iron maiden
from arwen's favorite games by arwen
Faking, baking but breath-taking
from Multi-queens! by Catfriend
Moshe Mitz's favorite games
by Moshe Mitz
Five queens, but fake...
from Caïssa's dream world by nikolaas
Alekhine has 3 queens on board, NN has 2.
from Weirdest. Games. Ever. by Calchexas
woodenbishop's favorite games #1
by woodenbishop
It's a very unusual game, 5 queens
from Doda's favorite games by Doda
wasaka's favorite games
by wasaka
5 Queens! Even though it's made up it's fun!
from cu8sfan's favorite games by cu8sfan
Alekhine's Five Queens Game - is it a fake?
from Calchexas' Famous Games by Calchexas
Check mate II
by popski
My Great Predecessors: Alexander the Fourth
by grozny
The Harem
from xfer's favorite games 2006 by xfer
plus 166 more collections (not shown)

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC