chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Karl August Walbrodt vs Siegbert Tarrasch
Nuremberg m (1894), Nuremberg GER, rd 1, Aug-01
Italian Game: Italian Variation (C50)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 5 times; par: 74 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more K A Walbrodt/Tarrasch games
sac: 39...Rxf3 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Tarrasch said he made an incorrect move in this game to avoid a draw. Hard to say what he meant. Maybe he thought 10....Bxe3 was objectively best.

The game is more or less even throughout until Walbrodt blunders with 31. Qd4, allowing ...Nf5 and the fork at e3 can't be prevented.

39....Rxf3! winds things up nicely. Fritz prefers 41...Qh5 to 41...Ra1, but both moves are quite decisive.

Sep-23-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <keypusher> In his book "Three Hundred Chess Games", Tarrasch comments regarding his 10th move; <Simplest and probably best, would be to trade on e3, leading to an almost symmetrical position, with a draw the likely outcome. I decided to prevent this, and thus misplaced the Bishop, losing a tempo. This is generally called playing for a win, but it actually should be called playing for a loss.>
Sep-24-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <pawn and two><This is generally called playing for a win, but it actually should be called playing for a loss.>

So that's where Tarrasch wrote that famous phrase. Thanks!

Did Tarrasch show an advantageous continuation for White after 10....Ba7? Fritz liked 11. b5, but didn't see it leading to much.

Sep-25-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <keypusher> Tarrasch made several comments, but did not include any variations. I will include just a few of Tarrasch's comments.

After 12.Qb3, Tarrasch stated: <White begins an attack against Black's center, with this move and the following moves and up to a certain point White plays the game flawlessly.>

After 21.e5, <White keeps the e6-pawn backwards and he should now be able to get the better game.>

After 22.Nd4, <This keeps the e-pawn under fire. White now has a very free position and Black's position remains cramped.>

After 23.Re4, <White wants to move the other Rook to the d-file. Much better however was 23.Re2, as we will soon see.>

After 31.Qd4, <This will cost the exchange.>

I did a review of the game using Fritz 10. Fritz confirms that Black has a very difficult game after the opening. However, I did not find a decisive winning line for White.

As you have noted, Fritz did prefer 11.b5 Na5 12.Bxa7 Rxa7, but again nothing decisive.

At move 16, Fritz preferred 16.fxe5 dxe5 (1.01) (18 ply) 17.Nf2 Nf7 18.Nd2 Raa8 19.Nf3 Rad8 20.Rad1. White has a nice position, but I did not find a decisive continuation.

At move 21, Fritz preferred 21.cxd4 (1.04) (17 ply) 21...e5 22.Nf2 Ng4 23.Nxg4 Qxg4 24.dxe5 Rae8 25.Qd5. Again, White has a nice position, but I did not find a winning continuation.

At move 23, Walbrodt's 23.Re4 is a better move than Tarrasch's suggestion of 23.Re2.

Here is a comparsion of continuations at move 23: (.50) (17 ply) 23.Re4 Qe7 24.Qc2 Kg8 25.Rf3 c5 26.bxc5 Qxc5; (.35) (17 ply) 23.Re2 Nd8 24.Rd1 Nc6 25.c4 Nf4 26.Nxf4 Rxf4; and (.76) (17 ply) 23.Nf2 Nf4 23.Qd1 Kh8 25.Qd2 Ng6 26.Nd3 Ng5.

At move 31, White still had equality. Fritz found 4 moves that gave White evaluations of .03 to .15 at 17 ply. These moves are 31.Nxd5; 31.Ne2 31.Kh1 and 31.Ra1.

Perhaps with a deeper or better search someone will find a convincing winning line for White. However, I did not find one, and based on Tarrasch's notes, neither did he.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 1
from Tarrasch-Walbrodt (1894) by keypusher
Game 280
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Incremental
Match, 1894. Game 104.
from Tarrasch's Best Games of Chess. Part II. by Dr. Siggy
Game 280
from Tarrasch's 300 Chess Games by yesthatwasasac
Game 280
from Three Hundred Chess Games (Tarrasch) by Qindarka


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC