Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs NN
"Better to Give Than to Receive" (game of the day May-10-2004)
London (1873) (unorthodox), London ENG
Chess variants (000)  ·  1-0



find similar games 10 more Steinitz/NN games
sac: 12.Nxg5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
May-10-04  Elrathia Kingi: Even against NN, this is a pretty mate. Of course, the game is essentially lost from 6...Na6.
May-10-04  TrueFiendish: Chessgames: it's a minor point, but would white's a-pawn have been on a3, which is/was the convention in rook odds games?
Premium Chessgames Member That's not how it was submitted.
May-10-04  iron maiden: A-pawn on a3? I never heard anything like that, even for rook-odds games. What's supposed to be the purpose?
May-10-04  TrueFiendish: So that the a-pawn has natural protection at the start of the game, as it would have if the rook were present. I swear it's common practice, or was.
May-10-04  weary willy: I think True is right - have a look at some collection of Morphy's games ... don't know if it was *always* the case tho'
May-10-04  TrueFiendish: weary, maiden et al: I guess the idea is that the lack of protection of the a-pawn should not become an issue strategically or tactically, thereby somewhat spoiling the point of the odds play. I dunno.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: By the way, not all, but majority of Tarrasch's Rook odds games published in his Dreihundert Schachpartien were played with Pawn on a3. Steinitz played his Rook odds games usually with a-Pawn on a2.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Rook odds with pawn on a3-just a matter of taste-lack of protection? The queen's knight is also unprotected,nothing is done about that.

White giving up his queen at h5,what a hoot! I know how bad black was when Steinitz captured the pawn at e5 and got away with it! That is usually a taboo in KG.

May-10-04  aragorn69: Pillsbury may have played the exact same combination in 1901. Or he may not...

See C.N. 3288 :

May-10-04  somethingstrong: Generally, I've seen with studies, traps, NN games, etc. how one, possibly two poor moves can be punished enough to clinch a game. This game is ridiculous though. Black shuffles pieces around, oblivious to every threat. It's difficult to glean insight from a game with one side playing suboptimal moves the entire game!
May-10-04  TrueFiendish: kevin86: the queen's knight is not protected but the chances of that playing any significant part are pretty infinitesimal.
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Just kidding-after all,in the regular set-up both rooks are unprotected,right?

Like everything around that time-style was big.

May-11-04  TrueFiendish: kevin86: true, but that's the original set-up. My (somewhat erroneous) presumption was that the idea with odds was to create a situation as similar as possible to typical chess play but with less material, so black isn't going to get, for instance, the chance to go Qa5+ and Qxa2. I thought the pawn on a3 thing was the rule but, as you pointed out earlier, it's probably a question of taste.
Premium Chessgames Member
  GrahamClayton: Nice deflection sacrifice with 13. ♕h5, removing the black rook from defending the g8-square.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: UNORTHODOX. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Chess variants (000) 1-0 Storming Knights!!
from f i n d t h e o b j by fredthebear
Chess variants (000) 1-0 Storming Knights!!
from Decoy to, Deflect from, Remove the Guard 4 by fredthebear
handicap; "purdy" mate
from thesonicvision's favorite short games by thesonicvision
Cornwallis' favorite games
by Cornwallis
Steinitz gives NN a pretty mate :)
from Picturesque Positions by Benjamin Lau
Interesting Mate
from Games that just plain hurt by Elrathia Kingi
"It's Better to Give than to Take"........
from king bee's favorite games by king bee
With Rook Odds
from NN's worst defeats by Sibahi
May 10: Better to Give Than to Receive
from Game of the Day 2004 by Phony Benoni
Beautiful sacs!!....(GOTD)
from Collections in Idleness 3 by xajik
15 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection III by PinkLedDoor
Queen's sac.
from lemgelo's favorite games with white by lemgelo
w15 (remove white's QR)
from Checkmate miniatures by RookHook
nifty minature w/queen sac
from The Art of Sacrifice and Weirdness by tldr3
15 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection III by fudludder

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC